Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9000 matches similar to: "firewalld / iptables / nftables"
2020 Jun 09
1
firewalld / iptables / nftables
Once upon a time, Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> said:
> 'iptables' and 'nftables' are competing technologies. In CentOS 8,
> firewalld's backend was switched from iptables to nftables. So it
> would be expected that the iptables command wouldn't have any rules
> defined, it isn't being used by firewalld.
That is partially incorrect.
2020 Jun 09
0
firewalld / iptables / nftables
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 02:19:17PM +0200, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
>
> Despite that the migration of our applications comes with a significant
> workload. It seems that also every aspect of common services had changed
> with EL8.
>
> In EL8 firewalld uses nftables as backend. I wonder why iptables does not
> list any rules while also configured to use nftables as
2020 Apr 17
2
CentO 8 and nftables default policy
Hi list,
I'm studying nftables. I'm using CentOS 8.1 (Gnome) and I disabled
firewalld. I noticed that a default policy is created with tables and
chains probably for firewalld.
So I created a .nft script where I stored my rules with a flush for
previous ruleset, then saved on /etc/sysconfig/nftables.conf and the
enabled nftables service.
Running the script with nft -f script.nft all
2024 Oct 29
21
[Bug 1777] New: Error: COMMAND_FAILED: 'python-nftables' failed
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1777
Bug ID: 1777
Summary: Error: COMMAND_FAILED: 'python-nftables' failed
Product: nftables
Version: 1.0.x
Hardware: arm
OS: Debian GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P5
Component: kernel
Assignee: pablo at
2020 Apr 18
1
CentO 8 and nftables default policy
I had the same problem.
If you are not using virtual machines then
# systemctl disable libvirtd
works and is easily reversible.
Alan
On 18/04/2020 23:03, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
> Il 17/04/20 11:01, Alessandro Baggi ha scritto:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I'm studying nftables. I'm using CentOS 8.1 (Gnome) and I disabled
>> firewalld. I noticed that a default
2020 Jul 16
2
Iptables rules not working
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 9:25 PM Phil Perry <pperry at elrepo.org> wrote:
> On 16/07/2020 16:48, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am running CentOS Linux release 8.2.2004 (Core) on a remote server. I
> am
> > running the below iptables command to allow SSH port 22 from a specific
> > source IP 219.91.200.59
> >
> > iptables -A INPUT -m
2017 Aug 23
7
[Bug 1176] New: Invalid identifiers produce unhelpful error messages
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1176
Bug ID: 1176
Summary: Invalid identifiers produce unhelpful error messages
Product: nftables
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P5
Component: nft
Assignee: pablo at
2020 Jul 16
6
Iptables rules not working
Hi,
I am running CentOS Linux release 8.2.2004 (Core) on a remote server. I am
running the below iptables command to allow SSH port 22 from a specific
source IP 219.91.200.59
iptables -A INPUT -m tcp -p tcp -s 219.91.200.59 --dport 22 -j ACCEPT
> service iptables save
The above iptables ruleset is not working and I am still able to connect
from the internet to SSH port 22. I look forward to
2018 Nov 06
1
[Bug 1290] New: ptables: nftables layer breaks ipsec/policy keyword
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1290
Bug ID: 1290
Summary: ptables: nftables layer breaks ipsec/policy keyword
Product: nftables
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Debian GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: iptables over nftable
2019 Nov 12
6
[Bug 1382] New: nftables.py cmd leaking memory when ruleset contain mapping ip length to range with high limit 65535
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1382
Bug ID: 1382
Summary: nftables.py cmd leaking memory when ruleset contain
mapping ip length to range with high limit 65535
Product: nftables
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Gentoo
Status: NEW
Severity: major
2020 Apr 10
15
[Bug 1422] New: iptables-nft fails to check / delete rules in raw table
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1422
Bug ID: 1422
Summary: iptables-nft fails to check / delete rules in raw
table
Product: iptables
Version: 1.6.x
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Debian GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5
Component: iptables
2019 Dec 11
3
centos8 :: firewalld active but tables empty
Hi! I have a minimal installation of centos8 + packages for freeipa as a
vbox vm. there is something strange with the firewall rules :
[root at ldap ~]# iptables -S
-P INPUT ACCEPT
-P FORWARD ACCEPT
-P OUTPUT ACCEPT
[root at ldap ~]# firewall-cmd --get-active-zones
public
interfaces: enp0s17
[root at ldap ~]# firewall-cmd --state
running
[root at ldap ~]# firewall-cmd --zone=public
2019 Aug 04
2
[Bug 1359] New: nft 0.9.1 - table family inet, chain type nat, fails to auto-load modules
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1359
Bug ID: 1359
Summary: nft 0.9.1 - table family inet, chain type nat, fails
to auto-load modules
Product: nftables
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86_64
OS: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component:
2020 Feb 22
1
[Bug 1408] New: The Check option of iptables does not work as expected
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1408
Bug ID: 1408
Summary: The Check option of iptables does not work as expected
Product: nftables
Version: unspecified
Hardware: arm
OS: Ubuntu
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P5
Component: iptables over nftable
Assignee:
2017 Apr 01
6
[Bug 1140] New: nft dump invalid (flow table)
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1140
Bug ID: 1140
Summary: nft dump invalid (flow table)
Product: nftables
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86_64
OS: other
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5
Component: nft
Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org
2018 Oct 17
2
KVM + libvirt + nftables without iptables?
Hi everyone,
I use Debian 9.5 Stretch and NFTABLES as a firewall.
Using NFTABLES together with IPTABLES is not recommended,
but libvirt depends on IPTABLES.
Is it safe to run libvirt + kvm + virsh without IPTABLES?
By the doc https://libvirt.org/firewall.html,
IPTABLES are used for settingup filtering which I do not need.
Thanks,
Roman
2019 Sep 15
3
[Bug 1365] New: nft crashes in chain_print_declaration()
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1365
Bug ID: 1365
Summary: nft crashes in chain_print_declaration()
Product: nftables
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86_64
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: nft
Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org
2019 Oct 23
1
CentOS 8: what changed (regular UNIX admin commands)?
On Oct 22, 2019, at 15:04, Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net> wrote:
>
> firewalld is not really the same thing as iptables though; it's more of
> a management layer on top of just writing raw rules. One big issue I
> have though is that firewalld always sets up kernel connection state
> tracking, which is not a good thing for some uses (high-traffic DNS
> servers for
2017 Mar 22
5
[Bug 1135] New: When used as a script interpreter, nft fails if extra arguments are passed
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1135
Bug ID: 1135
Summary: When used as a script interpreter, nft fails if extra
arguments are passed
Product: nftables
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Debian GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
2020 May 27
17
[Bug 1431] New: flush set doesn't work as expected in script
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1431
Bug ID: 1431
Summary: flush set doesn't work as expected in script
Product: nftables
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Debian GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P5
Component: nft
Assignee: pablo at