similar to: RHEL 7.8 is out

I *know* there has been a lot going on, and congratulations on getting CentOS 8 out! But(!), I don't see any updates to CO 7.7.1908 in the "updates" directory on the mirrors I typically use. All the files date from Sept. 14th. Is something broken? -- *Matt Phelps* *Information Technology Specialist, Systems Administrator* (Computation Facility, Smithsonian Astrophysical

Forgive me if this has been answered before and I've missed it. This https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2206511 says live kernel patches will be available via yum updates as of RHEL 7.7. Is this carried over to CentOS 7.7.1908? -- *Matt Phelps* *Information Technology Specialist, Systems Administrator* (Computation Facility, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory) Center for

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 9:04 AM Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote: > There was a recent thread about Redhat's removal of drivers from LSI > SAS2, it's probably the problem you are facing. > It can be worked around with the help of Elrepo repo. > > > https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2019-October/173682.html > > >

On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 08:18, Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 6:33 AM Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: > > > > > > > On 10/3/19 9:35 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 at 13:52, Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> > > wrote: > > >> > >

On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 1:42 PM Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: > > > On 10/3/19 1:32 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > Forgive me if this has been answered before and I've missed it. > > > > This https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2206511 says live kernel > patches > > will be available via yum updates as of RHEL 7.7. Is this carried over to

> Am 08.12.2020 um 15:32 schrieb Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu>: > > This is really, really bad for the majority of us using CentOS. > Of course it is. > Is there any way we can lobby for the reversal of this decision? Remember > that the -devel mailing list, and IRC channels *do not* represent the vast > majority of CentOS users. Most of us are just

Red Hat released RHEL 6.9 yesterday. Why isn't CentOS 6.9 out yet? :) -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu

On 10/3/19 9:35 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 at 13:52, Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 1:42 PM Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 10/3/19 1:32 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>>> Forgive me if this has been answered before and

On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 12:08 PM Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> wrote: > > I *know* there has been a lot going on, and congratulations on getting > CentOS 8 out! > > But(!), I don't see any updates to CO 7.7.1908 in the "updates" directory > on the mirrors I typically use. All the files date from Sept. 14th. > > Is something broken? >

Johnny, Should we give up hope on this issue? On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com>: > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster < > leonfauster at googlemail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb

Stephen John Smoogen writes: > On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 05:02, isdtor <isdtor at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Is it not possible to use an nfs based repo for kickstart under CentOS 7.5? > > > > E.g. > > > > repo --name=epel --baseurl=file://server/path/to/local/copy/of/epel > > > > So the syntax looks to be > > repo --name=epel

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Christian Anthon <anthon at rth.dk> wrote: > What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is > officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to attacks > using ptrace. > > There is a mitigation described here > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384344#c13 > > which doesn't fix the

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Richard <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net > wrote: > > > Date: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:36:57 +0100 > > From: isdtor <isdtor at gmail.com> > > > > Has anyone tried the new flash player beta for Linux? > > > > http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer.html > > > > I can't get it to

The future of the CentOS Project is CentOS Stream, and over the next year we?ll be shifting focus from CentOS Linux, the rebuild of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), to CentOS Stream, which tracks just ahead of a current RHEL release. CentOS Linux 8, as a rebuild of RHEL 8, will end at the end of 2021. CentOS Stream continues after that date, serving as the upstream (development) branch of Red

Exactly the same... ??? [root at plexvm ~]# mount -t cifs //192.168.1.200/mp3 /home/plex/Musique --verbose -o username=plex,password=plex,domain=DERWAEL,ro,auto,vers=3.0 mount.cifs kernel mount options: ip=192.168.1.200,unc=\\192.168.1.200\mp3,vers=3.0,user=plex,domain=DERWAEL,pass=******** mount error(2): No such file or directory Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs)

We do have the elrepo drivers installed. Maybe part of the problem is also that we're using an IOgear KVM switch? On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Felipe Westfields < > felipe.westfields at gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'm having issues with a quad video card on CentOS. > >

Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Le 28/02/2019 ? 04:12, Jobst Schmalenbach a ?crit?: > >> I want to lock in the SDA/SDB/SDC for my drives > > In short : use UUIDs or labels instead of hardcoding /dev/sdX. > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/persistent_block_device_naming Yeah - I strongly believe in labels, given the fact that *no* one can remember a UUID.... mark

FWIW, we don't use a separate partition and haven't had any issues (we do set up / as a separate partition only 5GB large). We have over 150 systems that have been chugging along with many versions of CentOS this way for years. We only use ext3,4 filesystems though. And no volume manager. On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:42 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Timothy Murphy wrote:

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 10:04 AM isdtor <isdtor at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > So the syntax looks to be > > > > > > repo --name=epel --baseurl=nfs://server:/path > > > > > > that colon after server is not a spelling error. > > > https://pykickstart.readthedocs.io/en/latest/kickstart-docs.html#id48 > > > > That seems to work

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Johnny, > > > > Any ETA on version 39.0.2171.95 > > > > cheers > > > > > > bump > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list