similar to: Versions in RHEL and CentOS

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:44 AM Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 3/30/20 11:20 PM, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I had a doubt regarding RHEL/CentOS Versions. > > > > https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/amd > > > > in the he Notes > > > > No (8) > > > > says > > > >

On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 12:33 PM Peter Kjellstr?m <cap at nsc.liu.se> wrote: > On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 10:01:04 +0530 > Thomas Stephen Lee <lee.iitb at gmail.com> wrote: > ... > > Thanks for the information ?. > > Rented a new EPYC Rome Server from Hetzner, but sensors does not show > > status of all cores in list, which is why I asked. > > Curious what

why not use dmidecode ipmi,? things like that? On 4/1/20 11:40 PM, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 12:33 PM Peter Kjellstr?m <cap at nsc.liu.se> wrote: > >> On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 10:01:04 +0530 >> Thomas Stephen Lee <lee.iitb at gmail.com> wrote: >> ... >>> Thanks for the information ?. >>> Rented a new EPYC Rome Server from

On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 10:01:04 +0530 Thomas Stephen Lee <lee.iitb at gmail.com> wrote: ... > Thanks for the information ?. > Rented a new EPYC Rome Server from Hetzner, but sensors does not show > status of all cores in list, which is why I asked. Curious what "sensors" you are referring to.. Like this: $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/online 0-63 or this: $ lscpu | grep

On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 2:07 PM Peter Kjellstr?m <cap at nsc.liu.se> wrote: > On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 11:10:23 +0530 > Thomas Stephen Lee <lee.iitb at gmail.com> wrote: > ... > > /usr/bin/sensors > > > > from the lm_sensors package > > > > I had run > > > > sensors-detect --auto > > I had no idea people still used that package.

Good Evening, I recently purchased an EPYC quantum UPS. I installed NUT on the home assistant by connecting the UPS via USB and tried all the various drivers in the list, the only one that seems to work is: usbhid-ups with this log: s6-rc: info: service s6rc-oneshot-runner: starting s6-rc: info: service s6rc-oneshot-runner successfully started s6-rc: info: service base-addon-banner: starting

Hi, all We use AMD Rome CPUs, like EPYC 7452. RHEL said that RHEL 7.6.6 began to support these cpus(detials: https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/amd) , but we found that CentOS7.6 with kernel 3.10.0-957.21.3.el7.x86_64 also works fine. So, my questions are: 1) Is there any place that i can find the cpu support info? 2) Dose the kernel 3.10.0-957.21.3.el7.x86_64 from CentOS7.6 already

Hi, I would like to configure a Xen private network where the guests use private addresses. So far I have setup the Dom0 instances and the vm''s can access to the other guests inside the same server. Now my question is how can the guests reach the other guests that are located in other physical servers. Here is a diagram of how the network looks:

RHEL 8.1 released to cdn. did $ dnf upgrade and got 8.1 No official announcement yet. thanks --- Thomas Stephen Lee

On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 11:10:23 +0530 Thomas Stephen Lee <lee.iitb at gmail.com> wrote: ... > /usr/bin/sensors > > from the lm_sensors package > > I had run > > sensors-detect --auto I had no idea people still used that package. Especially on a server. Per core temperatures in linux for Zen2 is done using (a very up to date kernel with its k10temp module). Alternatively

I subscribe (pay) for a lot of things personally. Music, Movies, Anti Virus, VPN, Storage, etc. But for my business, I do not want to pay Red Hat, Zimbra, or Google Workspace. Why ? Because the general rule seems to be Oh! You are an individual, we will offer you affordable/free service What! You are a business, we will offer you extremely 'unaffordable' service. Because being a

On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:40:31 +0530 Thomas Stephen Lee <lee.iitb at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 2:07 PM Peter Kjellstr?m <cap at nsc.liu.se> > > wrote: > > > I had no idea people still used that package. Especially on a > > server. > > Is it due to some security issue ? Not security but safety (and also, it's not needed when

On 3/30/20 11:20 PM, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote: > Hi, > > I had a doubt regarding RHEL/CentOS Versions. > > https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/amd > > in the he Notes > > No (8) > > says > > "Update 2 of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8" > > does it mean it will appear in CentOS 8.2, or is already there from 8.0 ? > > thanks >

On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 11:25:18 +0200, lejeczek wrote: > Hi guys. > > I've have a guest and that guest differs from all other guest by: > > ? <os> > ??? <type arch='x86_64' machine='pc-q35-rhel9.0.0'>hvm</type> > ??? <loader readonly='yes' secure='yes' >

our new Server with AMD EPYC and super micro board reboots ramdonly. There is no error message before the reboot in /var/log/messages. we are running 2 Server with VMWare workstation without any problem. The new server should run KVM. older servers with AMD (before EPYC) running KVM without any problem. any idea or recommendation? -- Viele Gr??e Helmut Drodofsky Internet XS Service GmbH

Hi everyone, I just got a brand new server by Hetzner.de. The thing is, when you have additional IP, to use routed mode (precisely a subnet of IP, story of exposed MAC in their data center etc.) Bridged mode is NOT possible for getting connectivity in VM''s. Traditionally, I''m more confident with "standard" Xen setup, so it''s easy to switch from bridged to

> On 30/10/2018 06:46, Simon Matter wrote: >>> On 10/29/18 1:55 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >>>> To me it seems like, if they are smart, they will try to push IBM >>>> POWER >>>> and RedHat Linux together to establish real competition in the >>>> hardware >>>> market again (and of course don't forget to keep Fedora/CentOS

> On 10/29/18 1:55 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >> To me it seems like, if they are smart, they will try to push IBM POWER >> and RedHat Linux together to establish real competition in the hardware >> market again (and of course don't forget to keep Fedora/CentOS alive)! > > Er, RHEL has been running on Power for a very long time. The fastest > supercomputer in the

I have a server with a hosting company, Hetzner. The servers at this hosting company have a public IP, let's say, A.B.C.D/255.255.255.x. Additionally, one can order extra IPs like below: 1) additional subnet (let's say X.Y.Z.0 / 28) 2) single IP (let's say, E.F.G.H) With additional subnet, assigning the IP to libvirt guest is simple: - assign X.Y.Z.1 on the host - assign X.Y.Z.2

> On 2018-10-30 02:46, Simon Matter wrote: >>> On 10/29/18 1:55 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >>>> To me it seems like, if they are smart, they will try to push IBM >>>> POWER >>>> and RedHat Linux together to establish real competition in the >>>> hardware >>>> market again (and of course don't forget to keep Fedora/CentOS