Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "CentOS 7 host with guests as bridge cannot access host"
2020 Sep 06
2
debian 10, vm cant connect to the host bridge
This is my system info:
Debian Release: 10.5
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 5.4.60-1-pve (SMP w/16 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh
2020 Sep 07
1
AW: debian 10, vm cant connect to the host bridge
someone recommended that i should give br0 the same hardware address as eno2. I did that, and restarted the vm, and it still does not work.
Here is my current host interface config:
ip a
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft
2017 Jul 19
6
Re: SSH from host to domain using hostname
18. Juli 2017 16:45, "Michal Privoznik" <mprivozn@redhat.com> schrieb:
> On 07/18/2017 04:31 PM, c.monty@web.de wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I have upgraded all libvirt packages to version 3.5.0-655.1 and restarted host.
>
> That wasn't necessary. It's not Windows ;-)
>
>> This is the current default network config:
>> ld4004:~
2016 Oct 04
5
Virtualization Networking
On 10/03/2016 07:00 PM, TE Dukes wrote:
> /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-eth1
> GATEWAY=192.168.1.1
...
> /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-lo
> GATEWAY=192.168.1.1
Don't specify GATEWAY in interface files where it isn't used. This
should be set on eth0 only.
> # brctl show
>
> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
OK, so you don't have a bridge interface. If you want to
2017 Jul 19
1
Re: SSH from host to domain using hostname
19. Juli 2017 17:12, c.monty@web.de schrieb:
> 19. Juli 2017 16:36, "Michal Privoznik" <mprivozn@redhat.com> schrieb:
>
>> On 07/19/2017 04:27 PM, c.monty@web.de wrote:
>>
>>> <snip/>
>>>
>>> Guest OS is Debian 9 with this network configuration:
>>> thomas@vm02-fai:~$ cat /etc/network/interfaces
>>> # This
2020 Oct 21
1
about the new added attributes "check" and "type" for interface mac element
Hi all,
I have done some tests for the new attributes "check" and "type", could you
please help to have a check? And I have some questions about the patch,
please help to have a look, Thank you!
The questions:
1. in step 4 below, the error message should be updated:
Actual results:
XML error: invalid mac address **check** value: 'next'. Valid values are
2008 Sep 19
8
bridge + arp
Hi,
this is propably bridge related and not really a xen problem, but it
might help someone:
Some of our domUs are not able to arp. Arp -n show (incomplete), and
doing a tcpdump shows, that on the dom0''s eth0 the arp request goes out,
the response comes in, but on the vifX.0 interface the arp response is
gone.
dom0# tcpdump -ni eth0
arp who-has 10.32.2.51 tell 10.32.7.70
arp reply
2018 Dec 16
3
macvtap and tagged VLANs to the VM
Hi,
I would like to run a network firewall as a VM on a KVM host. There are
~ 25 VLANs delivered to the KVM host on three dedicated links, no LACP
or other things. I have the VLANs 100-180 on the host's enp1s0, the VLANs
200-280 on the host's enp2s0 and the VLANs 300-380 on the host's enp3s0.
To save myself from configuring all VLANs on the KVM host, I'd like to
hand the entire
2005 Mar 26
11
Do i need a proxy??
Goodday,
First my network layout:
dsl router (10.0.0.99)
|
server (eth0 10.0.0.1, eth1 10.0.1.10)
|
3 times windows machine (10.0.1.2, 10.0.1.3, 10.0.1.4)
(all with proxy settings 10.0.1.10:8080)
Now on the server is mandrake 10 installed with shorewall as firewall.
And a apache webserver (and no ftp server).
When i turned internet sharing on it started squid which added a line in the
2005 Apr 01
2
Problems using VMWare with a Bridged Firewall
Hi
I am using Shorewall with a bridged Firewall using the "bridging utils" from
Debian.
eth0 is connected to the router and eth1 is connected to the local lan.
eth0 and eth1 are both assigned zero addresses and br0 is assigned the
Firewall server address of 192.168.0.1
I should point out that Shorewall is working fine in Bridge mode, but I have
hit some problems while evaluating
2005 Apr 02
11
bluetooth nap and internet access problem
Hello,
I''m trying to configure my desktop as a bluetooth network access point for my
ipaq (as explained in http://www.stolk.org/debian/bluetooth.html).
I''m running shorewall version 2.2.1 on debian testing with a local network via
eth0 and internet access via eth1. I''ve created a bridge br0 for eth0 and
bnep0 and activated bridging in shorewall. dhcpd is listening
2016 Aug 29
2
IAX UNREACHABLE : Ignoring bindport/bindaddr on reload
Hi, see the log below
root at AsteriskSlave:~# ip addr
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
group default
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: p3p1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu
2015 Mar 16
2
Re: still possible to use traditional bridge network setup ?
Laine wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sendmail [mailto:justsendmailnothingelse@gmail.com] On Behalf
> Of Laine Stump
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 4:12 PM
> To: libvirt-users@redhat.com
> Cc: Lentes, Bernd
> Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] still possible to use traditional bridge network
> setup ?
>
> On 03/16/2015 10:08 AM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
> >
2020 Sep 22
4
nmcli: unwanted secondary ip-address
Dear CentOS-Community,
we are facing the following issue:
A secondary ip address seems to be automatically added to a nic which
causes several issues in our setup.
This server is equipped with four nics which are currently in use:
# nmcli con show
NAME????? UUID????????????????????????????????? TYPE????? DEVICE
eno2????? cb6fcb54-be52-4ab6-8324-88091a0ea1a0? ethernet? eno2
eno4?????
2007 Jun 25
1
Ping dom0 <-> domU result in "Destination host unreachable"
Hi folks,
I read quite some posts about "Destination host unreachable" problems
before, but none could help me to solve my issue. So here we go:
This is what I am using:
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 SP1 - Current with all updates
Network configuration of my dom0:
foobar:~ # ip a
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd
2016 Aug 29
2
IAX UNREACHABLE : Ignoring bindport/bindaddr on reload
I just see warning?
2016-08-29 11:30 GMT-03:00, Telium Technical Support <support at telium.ca>:
> This shows that asterisk's IAX is already bound to all adapters - so that's
> good. Symptomatically does your IAX stop working? Or do you just see a
> warning?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
>
2020 Feb 07
2
AD DC and file server on a virtual machine
Dear Samba-List,
i'm new to the list and new to samba. Right now I'm trying setup a samba
ADDC serving around 50 Windows 10 clients and a couple of linux clients.
My ADDC Host has two NICs, eth0 should be connected to the wan -
network, eth1 should be connect to a 10.* network, serving the windows
and linux clients.
The ADDC is up and running, serving only the 10.* network. I
2016 Aug 29
4
IAX UNREACHABLE : Ignoring bindport/bindaddr on reload
Oh! In that case ignore it.
Asterisk won't rebind the adapter if you've only changed parameters. The message is misleading
-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Vitor Mazuco
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 10:41 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re:
2016 Aug 26
2
IAX UNREACHABLE : Ignoring bindport/bindaddr on reload
Hi, I have already tried to change for bindaddr=0.0.0.0
but it didn't worked.
2016-08-26 11:44 GMT-03:00, Frank Vanoni <mailinglist at linuxista.com>:
> On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 10:12 -0300, Vitor Mazuco wrote:
>
>> bindaddr = all
>
> Try:
>
> bindaddr=0.0.0.0
>
>
>
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
2005 May 30
2
Proxy ARP working from Internet but not from fw and loc
Hello everybody.
I could not find an answer to my problem in the archive. (But that may just
be me :-) )
I have a problem with proxy arp and connection from loc (localnet) and from
the firewall.
Works fine from internet to dmz / proxy arp and vise versa.
I have a feeling the solution is simple, but I''m no guru in Linux routing
etc.
The problem seems to be the routing setup.
loc -