similar to: CentOS 6.10 bind DNSSEC issues

At Wed, 25 Mar 2020 17:03:23 +0000 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > ???????????? Anyone else had any issues with CentOS 6.10 bind DNS server issues Yes. The installed ISC DLV key installed with bind-9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.3.x86_64 seems to have expired and there does not appear to be a new bind-9.8.2 RPM with a new key. I guess you can

I have two CentOS6 boxes, both running Bind as a local resolver, with what appears to me to be the same configuration as each other. I have a problem on one but not the other, to do with DNSSEC Lookaside Validation. On the box with the problem, if I do: host www.bbc.co.uk 127.0.0.1 (for example), it sits there for a while, then gives me a timeout error. I did some tests while running a tcpdump

Hi List, I'm having problems installing certain packages. When I try to install fields, I get the output below. I have highlighted the what I perceive as the first error (spam seems to be a dependency of fields). Can I assume this is causing dependency problems for fields, which fails to install at the end, or is there a deeper problem? I run Ubuntu Karmic Koala on R 2.9.2. 2>

True that! Sorry smb.conf > [global] > netbios name = AD > realm = XXXX.CO.UK > server role = active directory domain controller > server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, > winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate > workgroup = XXXX > idmap config XXXX:unix_nss_info = yes >

hey, first, i user bind 9.8.1 as my DNS backend Well, I have a domain controller, dc1.example.com, running correctly and with the following configurations... == smb.conf == [global] workgroup = EXAMPLE realm = EXAMPLE.COM netbios name = DC1 server role = active directory domain controller idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes server services = -dns

Is this mis-configuration, or just noise in my log? ??? 29-Apr-2018 00:50:26.056 general: warning: managed-keys-zone: No DNSKEY RRSIGs found for '.': success: 1 Time(s) ??? 29-Apr-2018 00:50:26.120 general: warning: managed-keys-zone: No DNSKEY RRSIGs found for 'dlv.isc.org': success: 1 Time(s) -chuck -- ACCEL Services, Inc.| Specialists in Gravity, Magnetics |

Hi, I have 2 samba AD Dc's running 4.7.0 with bind_DLZ on both servers. For the most part things seem to be working as expected. I have created reverse zones as per https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_Administration#Creating_a_new_zone. I have noticed 2 things that seem odd. when I use the windows dns manager to add an A record. If I check the box that says to update the reverse zone and

Dear All I have a CentOS 6.3 machine. I am trying to setup DNS BIND setup in that machine. It is having a static global IP. I have done lot of reading , google search and tried all possible option, but still not able to resolve the issue. My named.conf looks as below. * * * // named.conf // // Provided by Red Hat bind package to configure the ISC BIND named(8) DNS // server as a caching only

On 08/28/2015 01:58 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 28/08/15 18:17, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> Bind if failing with: >> >> include "/var/lib/samba/private/named.conf"; >> >> which has: >> >> # more /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf >> # This DNS configuration is for BIND 9.8.0 or later with dlz_dlopen >> support. >> # >>

I had configured Samba AD's with Bind9_DLZ in all DC. But for some reason (i couldn't determine) three (sambadc02,03,04) AD's responded very slowly . So change to Samba_Internal backend into the servers with problem and works fine. sambadc01 -> with FSMO roles - Bind9_DLZ sambadc02 -> Samba_Internal sambadc03 -> Samba_Internal sambadc04 -> Samba_Internal My question is:

On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 11:39:50 +0100 (CET) Maxence SARTIAUX via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello. > > To follow-up this issue, since the upgrade, when i do a named reload > it crash, look like there's duplicated zones. > > Here's the log when i trigger a reload > > > nov 05 03:09:02 data.contoso.com named[2807]: received control >

Hi list, while preparing for the changed ACL/mode_t mapping semantics coming with onnv-147 [1], I discovered that in onnv-134 on my system ACLs are not inherited when aclmode is set to passthrough for the filesystem. This very much puzzles me. Example: $ uname -a SunOS os 5.11 snv_134 i86pc i386 i86pc $ pwd /Volumes/ACLs/dir1 $ zfs list | grep /Volumes rpool/Volumes 7,00G 39,7G 6,84G

Hello, Sorry for the few details. rsync: rsync -h -a -v /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/pragma.com.co/ root at server2:/usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/pragma.com.co/ first dc smb.conf: [global] tls verify peer = no_check ldap server require strong auth = no netbios name = NEPTUNO realm = PRAGMA.COM.CO server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, winbindd,

hello all reader hello centos network I use to bind core fecora 12 http://jason.roysdon.net/2009/10/16/building-bind-9-6-on-rhel5-centos5-for-dnssec-nsec3-support/ I am having problems with my dk and dkim signature of my emails I have successfully made the process of verification of signatures dnssec all my domains are correct and good displays on dlv.isc.org the reason for my problem just the

hello all hello postfix network hello centos network I am having problems with my dk and dkim signature of my emails I have successfully made the process of verification of signatures dnssec all my domains are correct and good displays on dlv.isc.org the reason for my problem just the reason that I have updated my postfix and I have recreated a pair of keys with openssl for dkimproxy the

Hi Anantha, > The upgrade from 4.6.5 broke all the servers. Although the services were > running and there is no error message, DNS resolution failed. Even from > inside the domain controllers, DNS queries failed. > > Samba Version 4.7.1 and Named Version 9.9.4. The same issue happened > with samba version 4.7.3 and 4.7.4 > > We had to revert back to 4.6.5 to bring the

Hai Santiago,   Your welkom, i hope i can help you out.   Post my your bind9 configuration, you can anonimize it if needed, but dont remove any lines from it.   And i need a snap of the log when bind is starting up. Like this one : Mar 29 16:42:58 dc1 named[21921]: starting BIND 9.9.5-9+deb8u10-Debian -f -u bind Mar 29 16:42:58 dc1 named[21921]: built with '?pr.... etc. .  Mar

Hi Rowland / Denis, Thanks for your quick reply. Find below smb.conf and named.conf for your reference. Few things I wish to clarify here. 1. We have installed the samba on CentOS 7.4 not on Debian OS. As, packages from repositories are of version 4.3 and 4.4, we have used sources, compiled & installed the package. 2. named.log had an entry "DNSKEY (.) could not be obtained, Time

Hi all. Our setup is samba+dlz AD DC. Since last week the DNS doesn't resolve the delegated record for our storage *storage.domain.ltd* (192.168.26.xx) when being queried from clients in 192.168.29.0 which is our openvpn designated network. The OpenVPN is configured to push the DNS of our network, and also successfully resolves other hosts in the 192.168.26.0 subnet. I have no memory of

Hi Rowland, 1. Thanks for you clarification ;) 2. About, my old DLZ configuration is: Versions: bind-9.11 - S.O Centos 7.8 This was the sambadc04 with the old bind dlz backend . [..........] [root at sambadc04 ~]# cat /etc/sysconfig/named |grep -v '^#' NAMED_RUN_CHROOTED="no" OPTIONS="-4" [..........] The /etc/named.conf [..........] acl "trusted" {