similar to: gdm postsession scripts

Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: > > Its seems that only the "Default" script in /etc/gdm/PostSession gets > processed. Is this the intended behaviour? This makes packaging harder. > Or can drop-in scripts/files be enabled? Correct - although if a file that matches the DISPLAY name exists (e.g. ':0'), that file is used instead - see:

I'm running a new install of 4.8-RELEASE on i386. Running "pkg_add -r gnome2", the following errors are reported: (I've defined the BATCH environment variable). Fetching ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.8-release/All/gdm2-2.4.1.3.tgz...Syntax error: end of file unexpected (expecting "then") pkg_add: command 'if [ ! -f

On 2015-04-08, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > Am 08.04.2015 um 16:22 schrieb Liam O'Toole > <liam.p.otoole at gmail.com>: >> On 2015-04-08, David Both >> <dboth at millennium-technology.com> >> wrote: >>> The easy way to restart gdm is when you are on the login screen >>> itself or the desktop simply press

On 08/30/2015 04:32 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 16:20:21 -0500 > Robert Nichols wrote: > >> Once the system gets into this state, the only remedy is a forced >> power-off. What seems to be happening is that an NFS filesystem that >> auto-mounted over a WiFi connection cannot be unmounted because the >> WiFi connection is enabled only for my login

On 2015-04-08, David Both <dboth at millennium-technology.com> wrote: > The easy way to restart gdm is when you are on the login screen itself > or the desktop simply press Ctrl-Alt-Backspace. This works for Upstart > in CentOS 6.x but will not work for CentOS 7.x which uses Systemd. The > service command does not work for gdm. However, logging out of the > desktop will

Am 16.04.2015 um 11:46 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: > Am 16.04.2015 um 11:43 schrieb Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi>: >> Is there any nice way to get tlsv1.2 support to centos 5? >> upgrading os to 6 is not option available. > > > Unfortunately not. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066914 -- LF

Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com>: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> > wrote: > >> Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu >>> : >>> Any new information here? >> >> maybe some cooperation with the fedora

in fact: modgnutls provides easy way to get tlsv1.2 to rhel 5 -- Eero 2015-04-16 21:02 GMT+03:00 Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi>: > well. this hack solution might work: > http://www.tuxad.de/blog/archives/2014/11/19/openssl_updatesenhancements_for_rhel__centos_5/index.html > > -- > Eero > > 2015-04-16 17:30 GMT+03:00 Leon Fauster <leonfauster at

Am 16.06.2018 um 12:25 schrieb Johnny Hughes via CentOS <centos at centos.org>: > We have now set the mailing list to rewrite headers. That also has set > the From: of the email to the Mailing list and not the Original Author. > The author is moved to the CC: block and you can still easily see who > sent it and my email client (thunderbird) still does things the same way >

> Am 11.05.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: > >> Am 11.05.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: >> >> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel >> >> shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about >> >> Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake >> >> has the current EL6

On Fri, 4 Dec 2015, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Any pointers on how to get the login screen? > > What about the gstreamer1 stuff, are all necessary > libraries (linkage) in place? Especially for the EPEL > stuff. You *need* to upgrade the gstreamer libraries or you break gnome (which breaks gdm). Uninstall whatever is clashing from epel, upgrade gstreamer, all will be well.

Am 06.08.2015 um 22:21 schrieb Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com>: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey at buc.com> wrote: > >> Doing a new install on the two 1TB drives is my current plan. If that >> works, I can connect the old drive, copy over all the data, and then try to >> figure out what I need to do to get all the

Johnny, Should we give up hope on this issue? On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com>: > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster < > leonfauster at googlemail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb

On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 00:47:32 +0200 Leon Fauster wrote: > source: > > find . -type f -exec md5sum \{\} \; > checksum.list > > destination: > > md5sum -c checksum.list Wouldn't diff be faster because it doesn't have to read to the end of every file and it isn't really calculating anything? Or am I looking at this in the wrong way. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~

Am 25.08.2015 um 16:31 schrieb Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi>: > 25.8.2015 4.03 ip. "Leon Fauster" <leonfauster at googlemail.com> kirjoitti: > >> >> In the hope that some skilled developers are here: >> >> We have a commercial product that do not run under CentOS6 >> >> /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not

I known its lower prioritized but any signs of the centosplus version of firefox? Just asking because of the severity class. Thanks for the effort! LF

https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake has the current EL6 variant support for it? Any experience? Feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, LF

In the hope that some skilled developers are here: We have a commercial product that do not run under CentOS6 /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found Is it possible to compile software (compile switch?) on a system that uses a newer glibc but in such a way that can be used (executed) on a system with an older glibc (like here: compiled on glibc 2.14 based system but C6 is on

Am 03.12.2015 um 19:35 schrieb Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com>: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:26:08PM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote: >>> >>> And the way I'd figure this out from the centos website is? > > Note that I was asking about the release numbering, not the release > itself. And while you're suggesting where I could find out more or > take part

On 5/25/2017 10:04 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > On 05/25/2017 09:32 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: >>> Am 25.05.2017 um 15:27 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>: >>> >>> Thanks. I followed this to: >>> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64/Packages/ >>> >>> And could not find any of the following: