similar to: anyone know of a list or wiki for GWC?

On Thursday, February 20, 2020 10:54:02 AM CST Fred Smith wrote: > Hi! > > totally OT... > > Hoping there is a mailing list or wiki (or other help forum) > for GWC, but haven't found one yet. > > I'm working on converting a bunch of my LPs to CDs, and am using > GWC (Gnome Wave Cleaner, or GTK Wave Cleaner) to clean up the noise. > It works great, but I

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:06:52AM -0600, Bill Gee wrote: > On Thursday, February 20, 2020 10:54:02 AM CST Fred Smith wrote: > > Hi! > > > > totally OT... > > > > Hoping there is a mailing list or wiki (or other help forum) > > for GWC, but haven't found one yet. > > > > I'm working on converting a bunch of my LPs to CDs, and am using

On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 11:34:32AM +1100, Bill Maidment wrote: > On 23/12/2019 11:06 am, Fred Smith wrote: > > >I can find no way to do it with pavucontrol, nor the default mate > >sound tool. > > In my SL7 Mate system I use the Hardware and Output tabs in > System->Preferences->Hardware->Sound > > Cheers > Bill Thanks bill. But nothing I do there

On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 5:23 PM David G. Miller <dave at davenjudy.org> wrote: > I do something similar to what you're trying to do when I digitize my > vinyl LPs. I take output from my amp/turntable into my sound card and > use Audacity to digitize it and write an appropriate sound file. I also > monitor the sound using Audacity by telling it to also route the sound >

OS: CentOS 5.0 x86. Hi, I have some old music tapes and a walkman, and want to move the music to mp3 format. So far I am thinking to use Audacity to record the music to wavs, and then do not know, somehow I will compress the wavs to mp3s as vbr 192 Kbps with something. Has anyone done this? What app did you use for recording the music from the tapes and what app did you use to make it mp3?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Folks, I've upload the preliminary patch against 3.0.23b that will become 3.0.23c so people can do full testing against what we hope to be the release code. Note that the reported version in the patch is 3.0.23c-gwc-1 to prevent confusion from the final 3.0.23c release. You can download the gzipped patch file from

Hi, I have a client connected to the ''net through 3 ISP''s. Have set up a Linux box to do routing and load sharing for the 3 connections. A fourth interface is connected to the LAN with private IP addresses. Am using iptables to SNAT traffic to the appropriate IP depending on the interface the packet gets routed onto. The setup looks something like this: Interface IP

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Folks, I've uploaded the *final* 3.0.23c roll up patch to http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/patch-3.0.23b-3.0.23c-gwc-2.diffs.gz. I've already cut the 3.0.23c tarballs so unless there is a major problem, this will be the final change set. Please report *any* bugs that you find. I'd like to wrap this one up and do the public 3.0.23c

On 01/07/2017 01:42 PM, Laurent CREPET wrote: > On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 10:23 PM, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: > >> Logitech H540 headphones were working fine. >> >> Suddenly stopped. >> >> > Maybe a stupid question, but did you try your headphones on another > computer? > Is the device listed in the ouput of command

change from v3: add x86 vcpu preempted check patch change from v2: no code change, fix typos, update some comments change from v1: a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted skip mahcine type check on ppc, and add config. remove dedicated macro. add one patch to drop overload of rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner. add more comments thanks boqun and Peter's suggestion.

change from v3: add x86 vcpu preempted check patch change from v2: no code change, fix typos, update some comments change from v1: a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted skip mahcine type check on ppc, and add config. remove dedicated macro. add one patch to drop overload of rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner. add more comments thanks boqun and Peter's suggestion.

On 15.4.2019 3.33, Larry Rosenman via dovecot wrote: > ?72% [ler at thebighonker.lerctr.org:~] $ doveadm search mailbox > lists/freebsd/ports-commiters? body 'sysutils' > [ler at thebighonker.lerctr.org:~] $ doveadm fts rescan > [ler at thebighonker.lerctr.org:~] $ doveadm index -q > lists/freebsd/ports-commiters > ?64% [ler at thebighonker.lerctr.org:~] $ tail -f

Based on some tests we ran, it seems the biggest performance hit you get from running within domU is from disk I/O. We did some mysql read and write tests, and for both, our performance is about half that compared to native. Has that been others'' experience? Is there any way to make this better? We are using physical partitions. In contrast, cpu/memory tests appear to be near

change from v5: spilt x86/kvm patch into guest/host part. introduce kvm_write_guest_offset_cached. fix some typos. rebase patch onto 4.9.2 change from v4: spilt x86 kvm vcpu preempted check into two patches. add documentation patch. add x86 vcpu preempted check patch under xen add s390 vcpu preempted check patch change from v3: add x86 vcpu preempted check patch change from v2: no code

change from v5: spilt x86/kvm patch into guest/host part. introduce kvm_write_guest_offset_cached. fix some typos. rebase patch onto 4.9.2 change from v4: spilt x86 kvm vcpu preempted check into two patches. add documentation patch. add x86 vcpu preempted check patch under xen add s390 vcpu preempted check patch change from v3: add x86 vcpu preempted check patch change from v2: no code

2016-10-19 06:20-0400, Pan Xinhui: > This is to fix some lock holder preemption issues. Some other locks > implementation do a spin loop before acquiring the lock itself. > Currently kernel has an interface of bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu). It > takes the cpu as parameter and return true if the cpu is preempted. Then > kernel can break the spin loops upon on the retval of

2016-10-19 06:20-0400, Pan Xinhui: > This is to fix some lock holder preemption issues. Some other locks > implementation do a spin loop before acquiring the lock itself. > Currently kernel has an interface of bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu). It > takes the cpu as parameter and return true if the cpu is preempted. Then > kernel can break the spin loops upon on the retval of

Does anyone know how to maximize music on hold quality on calls inbound from PSTN? I know that it is common to have choppy and static sounding music on hold when connecting via PSTN but how can that be minimized? I assume that the bitrates, type of music, etc can minimize the effects. Does anyone have any experience in this area? Do you know where I should look for more information?

What is there available for Centos? Now that Audacity is no longer available to us... I do have Audacity on an XP system, so I do have the option to shuffle files between systems....

From: Zengruan Ye <yezengruan at huawei.com> This patch set aims to support the vcpu_is_preempted() functionality under KVM/arm64, which allowing the guest to obtain the vcpu is currently running or not. This will enhance lock performance on overcommitted hosts (more runnable vcpus than physical cpus in the system) as doing busy waits for preempted vcpus will hurt system performance far