similar to: Error in Centos 8 Linux 8.1.1911-x86_64 distro, syslinux 6.04 required vs. 6.03

On 2016.03.03 04:37, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux wrote: > I don't think that is an issue. Well, I didn't really want to mention it, because it's going to be more of a rant that anything else, but since this is being brought up, versioning detection and handling has very much been an issue for me in Rufus. As I mentioned in the summary of the patches I submitted recently, 6.03

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 10:27:02PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > On 10/17/2014 09:19 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > > you may want to release 6.04 > > in less than ten days, so that Daniel has a chance to package it up for > > Debian jessie > > i would need to upload it saturday next week at latest (2015-10-25), > anything after that will not make it. Where this mostly

On 06.03.2016 16:47, poma wrote: > ... >> nasm -f elf -Ox -g -F dwarf -DDATE_STR="''" \ >> -DHEXDATE="0x56dc3c62" \ >> -Di386 \ >> -I/tmp/syslinux-6.04-pre1/core/ \ >> -l ldlinux.lsr -o ldlinux.o -MP -MD ./.ldlinux.o.d /tmp/syslinux-6.04-pre1/core/ldlinux.asm >> nasm -f elf -Ox -g -F dwarf -DDATE_STR="''" \

On 2016.03.06 23:25, Shao Miller via Syslinux wrote: > Having typed that, perhaps we could discuss your (or Rufus') specific > needs, in parallel? I think that is probably worthwhile, as I wouldn't mind having a second opinion from Syslinux developers on whether my current ISO -> USB conversion process could be improved. > Do I understand correctly that the primary >

On 07.03.2016 06:45, poma wrote: > On 06.03.2016 18:23, poma wrote: >> On 06.03.2016 16:47, poma wrote: >>> ... >>>> nasm -f elf -Ox -g -F dwarf -DDATE_STR="''" \ >>>> -DHEXDATE="0x56dc3c62" \ >>>> -Di386 \ >>>> -I/tmp/syslinux-6.04-pre1/core/ \ >>>> -l ldlinux.lsr -o ldlinux.o -MP -MD

Renato, I don't think it would take that long to make a little script that even an XP user could use to generate GPT formatted thumb-drives. I believe someone made the Rufus utility for just such an occasion Rufus - Create bootable USB drives the easy way Rufus - Create bootable USB drives the easy way Rufus Create bootable USB drives the easy way Rufus is a utility that

> I've upgraded the syslinux from the kernel.org builds over the years up > to 6.03 and just copied the newer files, and it has worked. Saw that the > new build machine I setup with Fedora 30 had the version 6.04 files. I > tried the same process, and then booting the iso comes up with message > that it can not load ldlinux.c32, which is there. > > I then downlod the

Hi, As I am embedding part of the Syslinux code in Rufus [1], I have encountered various issues that I would like to see addressed, so that I can keep most of my code in sync with the official mainline. Some of these fixes have to do with being more friendly with MSVC compilation, and other are fixes for actual Syslinux issues, that Rufus users have encountered. For convenience, the

> Thanks. Just went back to the 6.03 version, and it works fine, just > looking to see if maybe the newer version would add some additonal > support. IMNSHO, for the last few years Fedora has not been "the best" in maintaining the Syslinux-related packages. OTOH, I just tested a very basic ISO image with the "6.04-0.12.fc30" binaries, and I am able to get to the

I have a project G4L that has used syslinux for many years. I've upgraded the syslinux from the kernel.org builds over the years up to 6.03 and just copied the newer files, and it has worked. Saw that the new build machine I setup with Fedora 30 had the version 6.04 files. I tried the same process, and then booting the iso comes up with message that it can not load ldlinux.c32, which is

Thanks. Any chance to update the changelog as well. The NEWS file in the archive over at https://www.zytor.com/pub/syslinux/Testing/6.04/ only lists changes for 6.03 On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 5:08 PM H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux < syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > It has been the case for quite a while that the master tree is > unambiguously better than 6.03. I have thus

On 06.03.2016 18:23, poma wrote: > On 06.03.2016 16:47, poma wrote: >> ... >>> nasm -f elf -Ox -g -F dwarf -DDATE_STR="''" \ >>> -DHEXDATE="0x56dc3c62" \ >>> -Di386 \ >>> -I/tmp/syslinux-6.04-pre1/core/ \ >>> -l ldlinux.lsr -o ldlinux.o -MP -MD ./.ldlinux.o.d /tmp/syslinux-6.04-pre1/core/ldlinux.asm >>>

> > SYSLINUX 6.03 CHS 6.03-pre1 ... > > Failed to load ldlinux.c32 > Boot failed: please change disks and press a key to continue. > First, let me clarify that all the scripts and procedures in the Clonezilla site are not related to this official Syslinux mailing list or to The Syslinux Project. They are done by the Clonezilla team. Now that I know you are working

On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:04:41 -0400 (EDT) > From: Eric Sandeen <esandeen at redhat.com> > To: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> > Cc: Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu>, > For discussion of Syslinux and tftp-hpa <syslinux at zytor.com>, > Lukas Czerner <lczerner at redhat.com> > Subject: Re:

With the release of 6.03 on October 6th. but page still shows latest as 2013-10-13 : Syslinux 6.02 released. http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/The_Syslinux_Project On 6 Oct 2014 at 9:35, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Date sent: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 09:35:19 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor.com> To: For discussion of Syslinux and tftp-hpa

... > nasm -f elf -Ox -g -F dwarf -DDATE_STR="''" \ > -DHEXDATE="0x56dc3c62" \ > -Di386 \ > -I/tmp/syslinux-6.04-pre1/core/ \ > -l ldlinux.lsr -o ldlinux.o -MP -MD ./.ldlinux.o.d /tmp/syslinux-6.04-pre1/core/ldlinux.asm > nasm -f elf -Ox -g -F dwarf -DDATE_STR="''" \ > -DHEXDATE="0x56dc3c62" \ > -Di386 \ >

On 16 Aug 2019 at 5:40, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: To: "syslinux at zytor.com" <syslinux at zytor.com> Date sent: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 05:40:45 +0000 Subject: Re: [syslinux] Question on upgrading to syslinux 6.04? From: Ady Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at syslinux.org> Send reply to: Ady Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> > > I've

Hi Shao - looks like forgot to reply to this earlier post of yours, so here goes. On 2016.03.08 04:59, Shao Miller via Syslinux wrote: > 1. Customized Syslinux could be customized such that it refuses to boot > from USB. No amount of version-matching nor downloading from the > same source can help with that scenario. A different Syslinux would > be needed, by definition

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 6:00 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: > On 03/08/2016 02:53 PM, Gene Cumm wrote: >> >> Poma, in my opinion, this behavior means it's your/Fedora's responsibility >> to propose a change that distinguishes between broken and working NASM >> 2.11.06 or revert the commit in your/Fedora's build. >> > > Yes, it

On 3/8/2016 14:26, Pete Batard via Syslinux wrote: > [...] > But in essence, yes, that's pretty much it. So then some thoughts: 1. Did you mean a truly "merged" file, where the very same file could be used for ISOLINUX and for disk-based Syslinux? Or did you mean "tacked on," where ldlinux.bin would be appended to isolinux.bin so that you could later