similar to: Network Diagnostics

Hi Michal, Thank you for your suggestion. My apologies that I took sometime to get back on further confirmation. Regrettably, my tshark is still unable to find libvirt payload inside packet capture, though it lists libvirt as a possible filter. # rpm -ql libvirt-wireshark-1.2.9.3-2.fc21.x86_64 /usr/lib64/wireshark/plugins/1.12.5/libvirt.so As I used wireshark 1.12.6 version, I

W dniu 13.09.2018 o?22:19, Oleg Cherkasov pisze: > On 13. sep. 2018 21:02, Marcin Trendota wrote: >> >> There is nginx on port 80. >> I've turned off SELinux for testing purposes. >> >> [root at chamber ~]# nmap chamber -p80 >> [...] >> PORT?? STATE SERVICE >> 80/tcp open? http >> >> [root at chamber ~]# nmap -p80

Hi, I am trying libvirt plugin in wireshark to dissect RPC payload in TCP, but finding dissector code not really working. My env is Fedora core 21 (x86_64) and installed packages are as follow: wireshark-1.12.6-1.fc21.x86_64 libvirt-wireshark-1.2.9.3-2.fc21.x86_64 Earlier, just after installation, I noticed libvirt.so available only in /usr/lib64/wireshark/plugins/1.12.5/ . Wireshark

Hi, We are in the process of testing a migration of our current setup which contains Samba 4 as Classic DC with LDAP backend, Isilon OneFS bulk storage serving NFS/SMB shares and Windows/Mac/Linux clients to a more modern Samba 4 AD. We need to migrate to Samba AD because of Windows 10 and macos 10.13.x (and for several other reasons). But we run into an issue with authenticating the clients

Thank you Michal. With your pcap, I could confirm that, libvirt dissector worked in my environment as well. Yes, it could be that, my pcap do not have libvirt rpc packets correctly though I would have expected. I am checking on it. Regards, Gowrishankar On Thursday 07 January 2016 03:51 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 07.01.2016 08:05, gowrishankar wrote: >> Hi Michal, >>

Hi All Yesterday i had installed wireshark on my centos box which does not have the GUI , It is actually a hardened box. I installed the tool using the following command: yum install wireshark After installation i dont know how to proceed further in capturing the packets. I basically want to capture packets and copy them onto my windows box. On the windows box i can use the Wireshark UI to

Hi, we now have an old Windows NT4.0 domain served by Samba 4.2.x (using Samba and LDAP) and want to move to Windows AD. The reason we need to do that is because of the clients (Windows 10 and MacOS) and because of a third party device which does not want to talk to Samba AD (Isilon OneFS). I did a 'classicupgrade' to Samba AD from our Samba/LDAP config and then I use this guide :

As part of my initial KVM host on C8 deployment, I decided to set up some HA features on the new host, specifically NIC teaming. Teaming seems to be bond++ of a sort, so I thought I would at least try it.? So here's the scenario: 1.) Server with two gigabit ethernet ports, two Cisco switches. 2.) During install, used the 'Server with GUI' group and added the virtualization

I am trying to replace values of a vector (consisting of 15 values) by a value that is related to a matching value in a dataset (consisting of 17 rows). Here's an example The vector: v <- c(f,a,e,d,m,o,e,f,i,n,e,i,b,a,o) The dataset's columns consist of the following values d[,1] <- c(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l,m,n,o,p,q) d[,2] <- 1:17 So I want to end up with a vector that

On Mon, 15 Jan 2018, Aurélien Aptel wrote: > "Barbara M. via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> writes: >> Anyway, tried your hint. >> No difference for the specific win 10 client. Still can't connect. >> All other Win 10 and the 2016 tested still works as usual. >> smbstatus still reports the "strange" rows: > > Try looking at a

Hi all... Recently a new Fail2Ban was available among some other updates for my Centos 7 system, and I just updated all. It seems that was a very BAD idea. Just noticed that Fail2Ban have generated a 6MB error log because of the update, and FirewallD a 1MB log of errors ! (not sure if any of those were really working after this) ok, I'll just run yum downgrade fail2ban I thought. Naa, no

Dear R users, Could you help my with the following problem? I want to repeat a glm analysis with 2 independent variables for all 900 variables (snps) in my data set. So, I want to check whether snp1 has a different effect on my outcome variable in patients and controls(phenotype). And repeat that for snp2 to snp900. Is there an easy way to get a summary of the data, e.g. a list of P values of all

On 1/5/2016 7:19 PM, Lee Brown wrote: > > A total guess would be to use either ldaps:// and don't bother with > start_tls, or add the :636 to the end of the ldap:// specification as it > seems to me that start_tls is pretty agnostic regarding whatever > protocol it works against (SMTP, LDAP, etc.). ie > > passdb backend = ldapsam:"ldaps://ldap-server-fqdn" >

Hi, we have successfully installed our samba4 AD domain with AD DC, smb file server and Windows/Linux clients in the same subnet. Now we try to add a couple of Windows PCs to the domain that are located in a different subnet. As soon as the AD DC is added as the DNS server on the Windows clients it is no longer possible to resolve ip addresses. In other words, for those PCs DNS is not working.

On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Graham Allan <allan at physics.umn.edu> wrote: > On 01/06/2016 09:53 AM, Graham Allan wrote: > >> >> The packet dump is a good idea. I get the same failure using straight >> SSL to port 636, but wireshark might be able to decode any StartTLS >> negotiation attempt on the default port. Failing that I guess I'll >>

-----Original Message----- From: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> On Behalf Of Rowland penny via samba Sent: torsdag 29. august 2019 16:33 To: samba at lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] no DNS functionality on second subnet On 29/08/2019 13:50, Andreas Habel via samba wrote: > Hi, > > we have successfully installed our samba4 AD domain with AD > DC, smb > file

Hi! I'm experiencing strange performance problems after upgrading to samba 3.2.8 from 3.0.30. For all users except smbadmin (who has administrative rights), read performance is _very_ bad. Looking at the read-requests using filemon and wireshark, I found out that for those users, every read is handled transparently (unbuffered) over the net. (I.e. a 2 byte read-request of the application

> -----Original Message----- > From: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> On Behalf Of Rowland penny via > samba > Sent: fredag 30. august 2019 09:57 > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: [Samba] no DNS functionality on second subnet > > On 30/08/2019 07:00, Andreas Habel via samba wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: samba

hey, just did a yum install wireshark on a fresh and clean CentOS 4.6 box, and got a bazillion warnings about libsmi... # cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 4.6 (Final) # yum install wireshark Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Excluding Packages from CentOS-4 - Updates Finished Excluding Packages from CentOS-4 - Base

How can I objectively measure jitter in Asterisk on a SIP channel? I don't just want to turn the new 1.4 jitter buffer on. I want to measure jitter. Thanks, Doug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070803/c6d473ce/attachment.htm