similar to: RHEL 8.1

On Sat, 23 Nov 2019, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 at 15:39, Sergio Belkin <sebelk at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I was using yum for years on CentOS servers, and since a few years ago dnf >> on Fedora desktops. My question is: >> Is the same yum4 on CentOS 8 that dnf? What should I use? >> Thanks in advance >>

Hi, I was using yum for years on CentOS servers, and since a few years ago dnf on Fedora desktops. My question is: Is the same yum4 on CentOS 8 that dnf? What should I use? Thanks in advance -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org

Hi all, I received this e-mail from Christer regarding dead links in the CentOS 8.1911 release notes. Can the maintainer of the CentOS 8 release notes determine what the best course of action is?? Thanks. Regards, Timothy -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Update CentOS wiki 8.1 Release notes Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 11:03:42 +0100 From: Christer M. Fekjan <christer.centos-e216w

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 12:38 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko at redhat.com > > > wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > Hey there, > > > > I'm working on DNF in CentOS so I will be updating DNF pages on

Il giorno dom, 19/02/2017 alle 21.17 -0700, Jeff Sadowski via samba ha scritto: > I was never able to build it in a way I have rebuild samba from rpm source on Centos 7 (samba 4.4.4) and Fedora (samba 4.5.5) with this procedure: > > [lesca at dodo rpmbuild]$ cat rebuild.txt > # > > # Install Development ... > sudo yum -y groupinstall 'Development Tools' > # sudo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hey there, I'm working on DNF in CentOS so I will be updating DNF pages on ConfigManagement SIG in very near future ? That's everything from me at this point.. P.S. I need edit access to https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup /ConfigManagementSIG/DNF - -- - -Igor Gnatenko -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

I am doing a dnf install package_without_version for instance for g++: [piot at paris opal]$ sudo dnf install gcc-c++ Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:06 ago on Thu 16 Jan 2020 06:45:59 AM CST. Error: Problem: package gcc-8.3.1-4.5.el8.x86_64 requires glibc-devel >= 2.2.90-12, but none of the providers can be installed - package glibc-devel-2.28-72.el8.i686 requires glibc-headers, but

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 2:02 PM Josh Boyer <jwboyer at redhat.com> wrote: Ultimately, the Red Hat teams are using modularity where they believe > it makes sense and using regular packaging to reduce complexity for > customers where it doesn't provide much benefit. > Thanks for the explanation. For those who want to know more, here is the documentation I used when I was trying

Hi, Note: Please do this on a test VM. My issue: I took the output of the following command $ yum list installed | xargs -n3 | column -t | tail -n +3 |cut -d' ' -f1 > packages.list from a CentOS 7.7 Installation. and did $ dnf install $(cat packages.list) --setopt=strict=0 on Freshly installed Minimal CentOS 8 VM. When I reboot I get Failed to switch root: Specified switch

I don't understand how I can upgrade my CentOS 7. cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core) I followed the directions found on the web (by installing dnf and so on), but when I tried to install centos-release I get dnf upgrade -y http://mirror.centos.org/centos/8/BaseOS/x86_64/os/Packages/centos-release-8.1-1.1911.0.9.el8.x86_64.rpm Last metadata expiration check:

On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 19:25 -0500, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote: > > I'm about ready to run "dnf erase *mate*" and try re-installing MATE > from scratch from the GNOME3 desktop. Is that possible without > ripping > the heart out of C8 by deleting other critical packages? I've attached a capture of "dnf erase *mate*" that shows the 104 packages

This has been solved, as far as we can tell. Problem was with KillUserProcesses=1 in logind.conf. This has shown to kill mounts made using mount -a booth by root and by any user with sudo at session logout. Hope this will anybody else who run into this. Thanks 4 all your help and cheers Gabbe 1 juni 2017 kl. 09:24 skrev Gabriel Lindeborg <gabriel.lindeborg at

On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 01:52:23PM +0000, Gabriel Lindeborg wrote: > This has been solved, as far as we can tell. > > Problem was with KillUserProcesses=1 in logind.conf. This has shown to > kill mounts made using mount -a booth by root and by any user with > sudo at session logout. Ah, yes, that could well be the cause of the problem. > Hope this will anybody else who run

All four clients did run 3.10.2 as well The volumes has been running fine until we upgraded to 3.10, when we hit some issues with port mismatches. We restarted all the volumes, the servers and the clients and now hit this issue. We?ve since backed up the files, remove the volumes, removed the bricks, removed gluster, installed glusterfs 3.7.20, created new volumes on new bricks, restored the

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:44 AM Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 3/30/20 11:20 PM, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I had a doubt regarding RHEL/CentOS Versions. > > > > https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/amd > > > > in the he Notes > > > > No (8) > > > > says > > > >

> On 21 Apr 2016, at 17:15, Chris Matthews <chris.matthews at apple.com> wrote: > > I love D3. This is a great idea. Maybe we can finally kill flot! > > We are going to have to start using the html data attributes more; but that is a good thing IMO. > > D3 would greatly simply some of our CSS/templates too. I am regularly surprised how hard it is to make a cell

just installed stock centos 8 x86_64 and did "dnf update", now reading up on centos stream, and wondering: 1) can i, at any time, decide to convert this system to centos stream, notwithstanding any normal updates i've done in the meantime? 2) if i'm running centos stream and decide it's just too progressive for me, can i dial it back to "regular" centos down the

I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free, and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it. What do CentOS users think of Redhat's offer? The registration with Redhat seemed very bureaucratic to me, and I'm not sure if I have carried it out properly. Also, I didn't see if it was possible to get updates, either with dnf or some other way. I've been (and am) very

All, While updating my package using dnf update all I allow dnf to clean some package with unresolved dependencies. I would like to reinstall some of them but got an error message "but none of the providers can be installed" during the install process as dnf is trying to install the dependencies. . This happens for some critical package like boost-openmpi-devel (see below for

Thanks, Stephen. Just for completeness, the repo I am currently pointing to are [piot at paris opal]$ sudo dnf update CentOS-8 - AppStream 775 kB/s | 5.8 MB 00:07 CentOS-8 - Base 798 kB/s | 4.0 MB 00:05 CentOS-8 - Extras 2.9 kB/s | 2.1 kB 00:00 CentOS-8 - PowerTools 686 kB/s | 2.0 MB 00:02