similar to: named errors in /var/log/messages

Hello, I'm running a CentOS 5.6 server through linode. I am atempting to configure it for ipv6, previously this had been done though not by me on a ubuntu box so the hardware can take it. I've got an ipv6 tunnel through Hurricane Electric and at a shell prompt have done the following: ifconfig sit0 up ifconfig sit0 inet6 tunnel ::IPV4 Address ifconfig sit1 up ifconfig sit1 inet6 add IPV6

On Mon, May 15, 2017 09:53, wwp wrote: > On Mon, 15 May 2017 09:22:54 +0200 "Walter H." > <walter.h at mathemainzel.info> wrote: > >> On Sun, May 14, 2017 11:00, wwp wrote: >> > On Sat, 13 May 2017 13:08:17 +0200 "Walter H." >> > <Walter.H at mathemainzel.info> wrote: >> > >> > This might become off-topic with my

Hello, I''m reading this guide on ipv6 (really just getting my "feet wet"): http://www.shorewall.net/6to4.htm In the section "Configuring IPv6 using my script" I can read that the IPv6 interfaces are: INTERFACES="eth2 eth4" and that correlates fine with the first diagram/figure. However, further down I read "You will notice that sit1, eth0 and eth2

I have begun to see these messages in my morning reports: WARNING: Kernel Errors Present pciehp 0000:00:1c.0:pcie04: Link Training Error occurs ...: 146 Time(s) pciehp 0ng Error occurs ...: 1 Time(s) pcieport 0000:00:1c.0: bridge window [mem 0xd0a000000.0 failed with error -22 ...: 1 Time(s) r8168: probe of 0000:01:00.0 failed with error -22 ...: 702 Time(s) r8168:

Hello Walter, On Mon, 15 May 2017 09:22:54 +0200 "Walter H." <walter.h at mathemainzel.info> wrote: > On Sun, May 14, 2017 11:00, wwp wrote: > > On Sat, 13 May 2017 13:08:17 +0200 "Walter H." > > <Walter.H at mathemainzel.info> wrote: > > > >> On 13.05.2017 00:29, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> > I have been working,

IPv4 addresses started looking very ugly the first time I got IPv6 working on bogomips.org. In case somebody else can''t stand how IPv4-mapped-IPv6 addresses look, the workaround is to use two listeners and ensure the IPv6 one is ipv6only. Unicorn itself supports IPv6, too, but nobody uses/needs it. I''ll add :ipv6only support shortly (probably tomorrow). >From

Prowling around in the system logs this morning I discover the following entries: May 27 09:48:27 vhost01 mcelog: Cannot open logfile /var/log/mcelog: Permission denied May 27 09:48:27 vhost01 mcelog: failed to prefill DIMM database from DMI data May 27 09:48:27 vhost01 mcelog: Cannot bind to client unix socket `/var/run/mcel og-client': Permission denied and later: vhost01 setroubleshoot:

Hello, how do achieve this: how must files /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ look like to be the same as entering the following two commands ... ip -f inet6 rule add fwmark 1 lookup 100 ip -f inet6 route add local ::/0 dev lo table 100 is there the localhost device lo correct, or does it have to be br0? e.g. a file route-br0 with 192.168.1.0/24 via 10.10.10.1 dev br0 does the routing to the

This allows users to start an independent instance of unicorn on a the same port as a running unicorn (as long as both instances use :reuseport). ref: https://lwn.net/Articles/542629/ --- lib/unicorn/configurator.rb | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ lib/unicorn/socket_helper.rb | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------- test/unit/test_socket_helper.rb | 8 ++++++++ 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 8

On Sep 4, 2016, at 1:27 PM, Walter H. <walter.h at mathemainzel.info> wrote: > 'ifconfig' doesn't show these additional addresses ... This is one of the many reasons why people don?t use ?ifconfig? anymore. -- Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org>

OS CentOS-6.2 with updates to present. I use git on this host to manage configuration changes and to monitor package alterations. This is not meant to be a security check. It is simply a way for me to easily recover from fumble fingered configuration changes. Yesterday git status reported that the following files had changed since the previous commit: # modified: ../usr/bin/gdb #

I've written a Smalltalk application which starts R on another machine and then communicates with it via sockets. The functions involved are: slaveStart <- function(masterHost, masterPort){ inPort <- availablePort() sendSocket(as.character(inPort), masterHost, masterPort) socketSlave(inPort) } socketSlave <- function(inPort){ ## listens on inPort.

CentOS 5.5, fully patched. I have a HE tunnel (tunnelbroker.net) IPv6 tunnel. This works pretty well and is simple to setup. Everything works fine. Until I try to set up an ip6tables firewall. eg if I try to view https://dnssec.surfnet.nl/?p=464 then the page never displays and the firewall shows kernel: IN=sit1 OUT=eth0 SRC=2001:0610:0001:40cd:0145:0100:0186:0033 DST=my.machine LEN=80 TC=0

Greetings! I have a FreeBSD 5.3 running on Intel SR1300 (dual xeon 2.6, scsi) server, with ztdummy.ko driver as timing source for asterisk. The typical output from zttest is: $ zttest Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... [..skip..] --- Results after 192 passes --- Best: 99.987793 -- Worst: 98.266602 But when i listening MOH, it's quality is not very good. It is slightly

I want to configure IPV6 on the system and not use some auto ipv6 config. I have tried to use IPV6_AUTOCONF=no in interface script dose not affect anything. ifcfg-eth0: GATEWAY=192.168.1.254 IPV6INIT=no IPV6_AUTOCONF=no BROADCAST=192.168.1.255 BOOTPROTO=none NAME="" NM_CONTROLLED=yes MACADDR="" TYPE=Ethernet DEVICE=eth0 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 MTU="1500"

Hello I've got this Mini-PC https://www.zotac.com/product/mini_pcs/zbox-ci323-nano everything is fine -> latest 6.8 kernel works; both Ethernet-Interfaces work and also the WLAN-Interface works; the two Ethernet-Interfaces are eth0 and eth1 the WLAN-Interface is wlan0 eth1 is connected on ISP side eth0 is connected on my LAN side to a switch; and wlan0 shall also be on my LAN side f?r

At the beginning of January I encountered a problem where several vm guests on a single host somehow managed to see the the virtual disks assigned to other guests on the same hosts. I was unable to resolve this situation and shutdown the affected guests after creating new guest instances and moving the services and data off the corrupted guests. I have since removed these guests via virt-manager

At the beginning of January I encountered a problem where several vm guests on a single host somehow managed to see the the virtual disks assigned to other guests on the same hosts. I was unable to resolve this situation and shutdown the affected guests after creating new guest instances and moving the services and data off the corrupted guests. I have since removed these guests via virt-manager

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I''m absolutely new to tc and found The Ultimate Traffic Conditioner to be exactly what I wanted as a starting point. Now the script doesn''t behave as I expected though, which applies to both the CBQ and HTB versions, the latter of which being my preference. The only changes made to the script are these assignments:

Has anyone set up any form of apache user isolation on CentOS? I have multiple virtual hosts on my machine, run by users who do not trust eachother. The problem is that any php script run by apache is able to do things like raw file io on other users' .htpasswds, php scripts, hidden directory listings, and so on. Database passwords can even be divulged in this way, since they are often stored