similar to: udev on CEntOS7 - can't get a match, looking for tips...

Thanks, I did catch the mistype (after IU posted). Still no match with the typo fixed... :-( Thanks, John H. Nyhuis Desk: (206)-685-8334 jnyhuis at uw.edu Box 359461, 15th floor, 106 On 10/29/2019 4:03 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: > In article <7025a0a8-1471-530d-dad0-3770e902ca31 at uw.edu>, > John H Nyhuis <jnyhuis at uw.edu> wrote: >> The mtx binary requires my tape

hmmm, I thought := assigned a key just like +=, except := locked it so it could not be changed later. Am I misunderstanding the man page for udev? Thanks, John H. Nyhuis Desk: (206)-685-8334 jnyhuis at uw.edu Box 359461, 15th floor, 106 On 10/29/2019 4:31 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: > Am 29.10.19 um 23:41 schrieb John H Nyhuis: >> Thanks, I did catch the mistype (after IU

Am 29.10.19 um 23:41 schrieb John H Nyhuis: > Thanks, I did catch the mistype (after IU posted). Still no match with > the typo fixed... :-( > > Thanks, > > John H. Nyhuis > Desk: (206)-685-8334 > jnyhuis at uw.edu > Box 359461, 15th floor, 106 > > On 10/29/2019 4:03 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: >> In article <7025a0a8-1471-530d-dad0-3770e902ca31 at

In article <7025a0a8-1471-530d-dad0-3770e902ca31 at uw.edu>, John H Nyhuis <jnyhuis at uw.edu> wrote: > The mtx binary requires my tape library to be assigned a sg# driver, but > the kernel periodically renumbers the sg devices. Normally, we would > write a udev rule to manually assign a persistent name, but it looks > like things have changed as I can't seem to get

P? Tue, 31 Dec 2019 18:53:38 +0000 John H Nyhuis <jnyhuis at uw.edu> skrev: > Just a random stab in the dark, but CEntOS6 was iptables, and CentOS7 > is firewalld. They take different fail2ban packages. > > CentOS6 = fail2ban > CentOS7 = fail2ban-firewalld > > Are you sure you are running the correct fail2ban package for your > firewall? (I screwed this up myself

Hi all... Recently a new Fail2Ban was available among some other updates for my Centos 7 system, and I just updated all. It seems that was a very BAD idea. Just noticed that Fail2Ban have generated a 6MB error log because of the update, and FirewallD a 1MB log of errors ! (not sure if any of those were really working after this) ok, I'll just run yum downgrade fail2ban I thought. Naa, no

Hi! I'm oVirt developer responsible for most of 'hostdev' support. While working on SCSI passthrough (that is hostdev type='scsi'), I've encountered few issues I'm not sure how to solve somewhat effectively and nicely. Just a note - oVirt by default disables 'dynamic_ownership', meaning we have to handle endpoint ownership/labeling ourselves. This is not

This patch adds some queue limit parameters into block drive. And inits them for sg block drive. Some interfaces are also added for accessing them. Signed-off-by: Cong Meng <mc at linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- block/raw-posix.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ block_int.h | 4 +++ blockdev.c | 15 +++++++++++++ hw/block-common.h | 3 ++ 4 files

This patch adds some queue limit parameters into block drive. And inits them for sg block drive. Some interfaces are also added for accessing them. Signed-off-by: Cong Meng <mc at linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- block/raw-posix.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ block_int.h | 4 +++ blockdev.c | 15 +++++++++++++ hw/block-common.h | 3 ++ 4 files

Greetings, I am trying to get samba3 to work well with W95. The windows 95 box can see the samba server, but cannot authenticate (claims wrong password) to get to any shares. I know the smbpasswd is good as I can authenticate and get to the shares using the same account and password on a W2000 machine. I suspect I am doing something wrong in the [global] section of the samba server. Would

> Am 08.02.2019 um 00:13 schrieb Ron Loftin <reloftin at twcny.rr.com>: > > On Thu, 2019-02-07 at 22:29 +0100, Helmut Drodofsky wrote: >> Hello Ron, >> >> sounds good. I have 2 tape changer. I persume, udev creates the same >> link for both. >> >> Can I modify >> SYMLINK+="changer-$env{ID_SERIAL}" >> >> The serial

Greetings, I am trying to set up a "Public" share that visitors who do not have accounts in our system have ro access to, while staff members (who do have accounts) have rw access. Our department has visitors who plug laptops into our network who will only be there once, and want to copy some of our software. However, with the following share definition, staff have rw access, but

Hello Everyone, We are using CentOS 5 system for certain application. Those are VM guests running in VMware. There is datastore issue occasionally, causing all file systems becoming read only file systems. So application stop working, and opened files cannot be written either. We cannot even ssh login to the system. Typically we had to power cycle the VM. We are trying to add reliability to the

Hi from Z?rich,Schweiz and a hot , humid day. The SCANNER,Canoscan LiDE 600F,is not detected by XSANE/SIMPLE SCAN. It is probably detected :- here is the OUTPUT from TERMINAL COMMAND "sane-find-scanner -v" ***************************************************** found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x2224 [CanoScan]) at libusb:001:005

Thank you for your reply, I'm still getting hard time to attach the hostdev, I couldn't make it work out of the doc. I took the address details from: # ll /sys/bus/scsi/devices/7:* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Feb 8 12:58 /sys/bus/scsi/devices/7:0:0:0 -> ../../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:03.0/0000:08:00.1/host7/rport-7:0-0/target7:0:0/7:0:0:0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Feb 8 12:58

Hello, does CentOs 5 supports an Adaptec AHA-2940W/2940UW scsi controller (pci)? Is this controller maybe supported by the aic7xxx driver? I want to install CentOS 5 on my desktop pc but the currently installed pci scsi controller for my scanners (drivers: 2x tmscsim, 1x advansys) are not supported by CentOS. So I am searching for something else. Thanks in advanced. regards Olaf

Just a random stab in the dark, but CEntOS6 was iptables, and CentOS7 is firewalld. They take different fail2ban packages. CentOS6 = fail2ban CentOS7 = fail2ban-firewalld Are you sure you are running the correct fail2ban package for your firewall? (I screwed this up myself before I noticed and fixed it...) Good Luck! Thanks, John H. Nyhuis Desk: (206)-685-8334 jnyhuis at uw.edu Box 359461,

Greetings, I am using samba-3.0.1pre3-1, and have noticed that the "force group" and "force user" option no longer seems to work. In spite of the option being set, the files copied are set to the current users user and primary group. Am I missing something with regards to how this is supposed to work or is this a bug? This is one of my share definitions for a team of

BLS #rsync --version rsync version 3.0.4pre2 protocol version 30 Copyright (C) 1996-2008 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others. Web site: http://rsync.samba.org/ Capabilities: 64-bit files, 64-bit inums, 32-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints, socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, IPv6, batchfiles, inplace, append, ACLs, xattrs, iconv, symtimes rsync comes with ABSOLUTELY NO

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11578 Bug ID: 11578 Summary: Rsync does start with an error directly connecting an USB drive to a port Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core