similar to: NFS shutdown issue

Hi Niki, md127 apparently only uses 81.95GB per disk. Maybe one of the partitions has the wrong size. What's the output of lsblk? Regards Michael ----- Urspr?ngliche Mail ----- Von: "Niki Kovacs" <info at microlinux.fr> An: "CentOS mailing list" <CentOS at centos.org> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Februar 2015 08:09:13 Betreff: [CentOS] CentOS 7: software RAID 5

Somewhere, mdadm is cacheing information. Here is my /etc/mdadm.conf file: more /etc/mdadm.conf # mdadm.conf written out by anaconda DEVICE partitions MAILADDR root ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-devices=4 metadata=0.90 UUID=55ff58b2:0abb5bad:42911890:5950dfce ARRAY /dev/md1 level=raid1 num-devices=2 metadata=0.90 UUID=315eaf5c:776c85bd:5fa8189c:68a99382 ARRAY /dev/md2 level=raid1 num-devices=2

Hi, I just replaced Slackware64 14.1 running on my office's HP Proliant Microserver with a fresh installation of CentOS 7. The server has 4 x 250 GB disks. Every disk is configured like this : * 200 MB /dev/sdX1 for /boot * 4 GB /dev/sdX2 for swap * 248 GB /dev/sdX3 for / There are supposed to be no spare devices. /boot and swap are all supposed to be assembled in RAID level 1 across

I have 4 disks in a RAID5 array. I want to add a 5th. So I did mdadm --add /dev/md3 /dev/sde1 This worked but, as expected, the disk isn't being used in the raid5 array. md3 : active raid5 sde1[4] sdd4[3] sdc3[2] sdb2[1] sda1[0] 2930279808 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4] [UUUU] So then I tried the next step: mdadm --grow --raid-devices=5 /dev/md3 But now I have

Running on a up-to-date CentOS 5.6 x86_64 machine: [heller at ravel ~]$ uname -a Linux ravel.60villagedrive 2.6.18-238.19.1.el5 #1 SMP Fri Jul 15 07:31:24 EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux with a TYAN Computer Corp S4881 motherboard, which has a nVidia 4 channel SATA controller. It also has a Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SX7042 PCI-e 4-port SATA-II (rev 02). This machine has a 120G

Hi, I am having some issues with a new server install in Singapore. Outbound calls work fine. Inbound calls are not picked up by Asterisk. Zaptel 1.2.25 and Asterisk 1.2.28 both built from source. libpri installed wctdm and zaptel load without error Jun 6 23:34:03 fs01 kernel: [211138.372933] Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 Jun 6 23:34:03 fs01 kernel: [211138.372937]

Hello, I have run into some performance issues after adding bricks to a 3.3.1 volume. Basically I am seeing very high CPU usage and extremely degraded performance. I started a re-balance but stopped it after a couple days. The logs have a lot of entries for split-brain as well as "Non Blocking entrylks failed for". For some of the directories on the client doing an ls will show multiple

> I got the email that a drive in my 4-drive RAID10 setup failed. What are > my > options? > > Drives are WD1000FYPS (Western Digital 1 TB 3.5" SATA). > > mdadm.conf: > > # mdadm.conf written out by anaconda > MAILADDR root > AUTO +imsm +1.x -all > ARRAY /dev/md/root level=raid10 num-devices=4 > UUID=942f512e:2db8dc6c:71667abc:daf408c3 > >

Hi - relatively inexperienced user here. I installed CentOS 5.2 yesterday (http install via a mirror, worked brilliantly), as well as a new Seagate 1Tb USB external HDD (from the new Xtreme line), for backup/media storage. Using fdisk I put two primary partitions on the Seagate, /dev/sde1 and /dev/sde2 (roughly half the drive each). Then I used mkfs.ext3 on both to create ext3 filesystems

I have been trying to mount a windows file share so I can use it for remote storage particularly for my Deki Wiki attachments. Anyway, I seem to have a mount established by doing the following. 1. Added following line to /etc/fstab //fs01/wikidata /var/www/dekiwiki/attachments cifs user,uid=500,rw,suid,username=wikisvcacct,password=testpwd,domain=corporate 2. Then ran following command to

Hi, I've installed Fedora C1 with Samba 3.0.2 and openldap 2.1.22. I've followed the example in the Samba-3 by example guide to use my server as a PDC. I'm able to connect to this server with all my users but I'm unable to use "Administrator" to log. Maybe it's normal but I doubt it. Here's the log I got for smbclient: [root@fs01 sbin]# smbclient -L

Hi, I've gone through the following link about member server and also the samba 3 by example and can confirm that nsdc is not enabled. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member We are having some issues with LDAP authentication. Here is our setup PDC and LDAP(samba classic) = dc01 SambaClassic domain = stdom Member server = fs01 We migrated from TDB to LDAP.

Hello everyone. I joined this list because I cannot find an answer to my problem. The setup is this: I installed CentOS release 6.5 (Final) minimal version Updated all packages Added the server to the Active Directory domain as a member server using the method described here (using adcli, kerberos and sssd): http://jhrozek.livejournal.com/3581.html It worked, I tested by trying to connect through

Hi, We are having some issues with LDAP authentication. Here is our setup PDC and LDAP(samba classic) = dc01 SambaClassic domain = stdom Member server = fs01 We migrated from TDB to LDAP. The old TDB users are able to login to the domain and access file shares without issues. Any new user created in LDAP is not able to access the shares. When trying to create shared drives for the new users

> Thanks Roland. Yes, I didn't even look to verify my fileserver is a DC. I must have debated a few times about the choice and forgot my last decision when installing. I know it's not recommended to run a fileserver on an AD DC, but hopefully you can still offer some advice on troubleshooting. Maybe this isn't even a smb config issue. It could be Windows related??? Here is the

Hi, Not sure exactly how I would word the subject line so appologies in advanced. We are trying to accomplish the following scenario: Location 1: PDC: fs01.loc1.example.com IP: 10.0.0.1 Location 2: SDC: fs01.loc2.example.com IP: 10.0.1.1 Clearly when we join the SDC to the PDC there is a naming conflict. The end result would be to have clients at each site resolve the fs01 name to

Am 25.09.18 um 14:26 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:12:18 +0200 > Daniel Jordan <d.jordan at gfd.de> wrote: > >>>>>>>> dc01:~# samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs >>>>>>>> Checking 4503 objects >>>>>>>> SID S-1-5-21-3258148492-1502286889-3538134041-1601 for >>>>>>>>

I got the email that a drive in my 4-drive RAID10 setup failed. What are my options? Drives are WD1000FYPS (Western Digital 1 TB 3.5" SATA). mdadm.conf: # mdadm.conf written out by anaconda MAILADDR root AUTO +imsm +1.x -all ARRAY /dev/md/root level=raid10 num-devices=4 UUID=942f512e:2db8dc6c:71667abc:daf408c3 /proc/mdstat: Personalities : [raid10] md127 : active raid10 sdf1[2](F)

Hi, When I upgraded my cluster, df started returning some odd numbers for my legacy volumes. Newly created volumes after the upgrade, df works just fine. I have been researching since Monday and have not found any reference to this symptom. "vm-images" is the old legacy volume, "test" is the new one. [root at st-srv-03 ~]# (df -h|grep bricks;ssh st-srv-02 'df -h|grep

Hello, yesterday i posted this issue on snapshot-discuss at listsourceforge.net (subject: wondering why backup wont start), but after reading the FAQ and searching the bugzilla DB i thought it could help to post here as well. i have a problem. But let me first describe my setup. i followed this howto: http://dev.kprod.net/?q=linux-backup-rsnapshot-no-root Now there is a backup server rpi-home