similar to: CentOS 8 Docker container is missing dnf-plugin-ovl

Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com> wrote: > Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 09:55:58 +0100 > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:23 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > >> The latter would explain the message my user's job gave him when it tried >> to umount / >> >> A bit of googling, and I see something called overlayFS can be used... but >> I know

I may have missed some overnight replies to my question from yesterday - if so, sorry. >From my googling, it looks like I should change from the loopback device to overlayFS (with overlay2). What I haven't found is, first and foremost, more clarity on configuring storage. It *appears* that the loopback storage is just a directory under /var/lib/docker (yet I see a reference in

The CentOS Atomic SIG has released an updated version (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download) of CentOS Atomic Host (7.1708), a lean operating system designed to run Docker containers, built from standard CentOS 7 RPMs, and tracking the component versions included in Red Hat Enterprise Linux Atomic Host. This release, which is based on the RHEL 7.4 source code

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 09:28:09AM +0100, John Hodrien wrote: > On Fri, 9 Sep 2016, Always Learning wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 23:22 +0100, J Martin Rushton wrote: > > > > > Under Fedora23 issuing a yum command gets you a warning, then it > > > automatically runs the appropriate dnf command. > > > > Can you tell us the DNF for:-

Was working on docker on a server, and on startup, I see Nov 29 10:58:27 <servername> dockerd-current: time="2017-11-29T10:58:27.612849959-05:00" level=warning msg="devmapper: Usage of loopback devices is strongly discouraged for production use. Please use `--storage-opt dm.thinpooldev` or use `man docker` to refer to dm.thinpooldev section." Nov 29 10:58:27

----- Forwarded message from Jaroslav Mracek <jmracek@redhat.com> ----- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 16:17:11 +0100 From: Jaroslav Mracek <jmracek@redhat.com> To: bcl@redhat.com, dcantrell@redhat.com, "Lumens, Christopher" <clumens@redhat.com>, pjones@redhat.com, sbueno@redhat.com, christos.triantafyllidis@gmail.com, kevin@tigcc.ticalc.org, clime@redhat.com,

I saw mention of dnf in a blog article about installing a package on CentOS. Further investigation revealed that Fedora is replacing yum with dnf, apparently a new and better yum. But it wasn't clear if dnf was a drop-in replacement or if some migration setup was required. Is it supposed to work with CentOS or do we ignore it until some future release?

On Sat, 23 Nov 2019, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 at 15:39, Sergio Belkin <sebelk at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I was using yum for years on CentOS servers, and since a few years ago dnf >> on Fedora desktops. My question is: >> Is the same yum4 on CentOS 8 that dnf? What should I use? >> Thanks in advance >>

Hello everybody, What is the status of the freeipa/sssd and samba conflicts in the repositories? I can not wrap my mind around that two big packages are not getting security updates anymore, because they are conflicting. I will go to FOSDEM in Belgium this year to figure out more, but I am considering moving my centos systems to rockylinux. Kind regards, Jelle de Jong On 12/16/22 16:59,

Kenneth Porter wrote: > I saw mention of dnf in a blog article about installing a package on > CentOS. Further investigation revealed that Fedora is replacing yum with > dnf, apparently a new and better yum. But it wasn't clear if dnf was a For the normal user (like me) dnf is neither better nor worse than yum. In fact it is almost identical. In my view, the introduction of a new

I discovered that 'dnf upgrade' doesn't actually upgrade to the latest versions of packages unless you also supply the '--best' flag. This also changes update -> upgrade, since apparently 'dnf update' is deprecated. --- customize/customize_run.ml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/customize/customize_run.ml

On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 23:40 +0000, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > > I think it should be called YUM. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF#Naming > DNF stands for Dandified yum. Since DNF is a tech preview > in Fedora 18 the Python module names can not be 'yum.*' as > that would clash with yum itself. In any single version of Centos there is only one YUM. Having

Mageia introduced dnf as alternative package manager for the next version 6, with the possibility to replace urpmi as primary in the future. As such, prefer dnf over urpmi+fakeroot to download rpm packages. Thanks to Neal Gompa for his heads-up. --- README | 3 +-- src/rpm.ml | 8 +++++--- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/README b/README index 79fcfd8..679bf70

hi everyone, I use dnf but one epel fails in a peculiar way: $ dnf repolist Failed to open: /var/cache/dnf/x86_64/7/x86_64/7/epel/repodata/8415cbb16f52517f34e3edac12a97c9893117f7b9de6cb22fc086048febd1c60-updateinfo.xml.bz2. that file is there, so I tampered with perms & fcontext but to no avail. dnf clean does remove it but on the first contact to epel repo it fails again. Do you see it

On 05/26/2016 08:45 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 5:17 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 05/26/2016 04:31 AM, Yamaban wrote: >>> On Thu, 26 May 2016 08:00, James Hogarth wrote: >>>> On 26 May 2016 00:57, "SternData" wrote: >>>>> On 05/25/2016 06:43 PM, Always Learning wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 2016-05-25 at

On Fri, 9 Sep 2016, Always Learning wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 23:22 +0100, J Martin Rushton wrote: > >> Under Fedora23 issuing a yum command gets you a warning, then it >> automatically runs the appropriate dnf command. > > Can you tell us the DNF for:- > > yum update > yum groupinstall > yum reinstall > yum erase DNF isn't used on CentOS.

On 05/26/2016 04:31 AM, Yamaban wrote: > On Thu, 26 May 2016 08:00, James Hogarth wrote: >> On 26 May 2016 00:57, "SternData" wrote: >>> On 05/25/2016 06:43 PM, Always Learning wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2016-05-25 at 22:32 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: >>>> >>>>> Also, yum had associations which it was sad to lose. >>>>

On 2016-09-08, Always Learning <centos at u68.u22.net> wrote: > > In any single version of Centos there is only one YUM. Having multiple > and incompatible versions of Yum in the same software release is > bonkers. Fedora is the place to try out bonkers stuff. If RedHat is satisfied with dnf then they will include it and not yum in RHELN. Maybe they will make yum an alias to

On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 at 15:39, Sergio Belkin <sebelk at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I was using yum for years on CentOS servers, and since a few years ago dnf > on Fedora desktops. My question is: > Is the same yum4 on CentOS 8 that dnf? What should I use? > Thanks in advance > yum4 is a thin wrapper on dnf mainly because Enterprise Linux users and scripts are used