similar to: Odd issue with 7.7.1908 updated with qemu-kvm-ev

Hi, > So, I have a client that has an internal use application that needs an > ancient version of libc5.? That's not a typo; libc5.? Before the server > that ran it died about a year and a half ago (said server was an AMD > K6-2/450 with a 6GB Western Digital Caviar drive that had been spinning > nearly continuously for almost 20 years!) it was running on Red Hat > Linux

I have an application with is binary-only, does its job well, and is only available for either libc5 (!) or early early glibc2.0 (!!). It has been running on a Red Hat Linux 5.2 (NOT RHEL; RHL) server for a really long time, and it honestly does its job and it's not easily replaced by an open-source solution at the moment. So, I need to do one of the following things: 1.) Run Red Hat

Hi list, I googled around but couldn''t find anything on whether someone has good or bad experiences with the Caviar *Blue* drives? I saw in the archives Caviar Blacks are *not* recommended for ZFS arrays (excluding apparently RE3 and RE4?). Specifically I''m looking to buy Western Digital Caviar Blue WD10EALS 1TB drives [1]. Does anyone have any experience with these drives? If

On 04/21/2017 12:11 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: > ... > The latest version of libc5 I know of that was shipped by Red Hat is > in RHL 6.2, libc-5.3.12. (There is a 5.4, but not sure of stability > or compatibility). > ... > I've successfully set up the bridging; a CentOS 7 VM on the same host > has full connectivity. So it's something about the rtl8139 and the >

I believe I've posted before about one of the speed issues we were having, of backups taking many, many hours that should *not* take that long. My manager and I finally nailed it down to the h/d itself. Identical boxes, and he tried a backup of one system which took under two hours, while the same regular one rand nearly six. I'd been googling on and off for weeks, and this morning, ran

Ok, I have a small dilemma, and I'm hoping someone here has had to do this before. I have at a site (not PARI) a server running some mission critical software that was written in 1997 for libc5, under AOLserver 2.3.? No, source code is not available for that version of AOLserver (it wasn't open-sourced until version 3.0, and the API changed rather dramatically at that point), not that it

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536 stuge-openssh-unix-dev at cdy.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|no access to tty on Linux |no access to tty on Linux |2.0 |2.0 and 2.4+libc5 ------- Additional Comments

Hello! We tried to move Windows 2003 VM with e1000 driver from Centos 7 which runs qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.491.el6_8.7.x86_64 to Centos 7 with qemu-kvm-ev-2.6.0-28.el7_3.6.1.x86_64 and we got problems- tcp sessions, namely smb connections, randomly drops. We didn't test previous qemu-rhev with this VM, so we don't know how it works in them. Could you tell me is this known problem? Any

On 11/27/2015 01:32 PM, Patrick Laimbock wrote: > On 11/26/15 09:47, C. L. Martinez wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I am trying to install nested Esxi 6.x under a Centos7 kvm host to >> use it as test lab for new ESXi versions, but I am doing something >> wrong because I can't install it. >> >> I have configured kvm and kvm_intel modules with the

Hi gang, I upgraded the E1000 driver on my machine from 7.3.20-k2-NAPI to 8.0.9-NAPI. This unfortunately did nothing to resolve the problem. The best workarounds I've come up with are: 1. use -l on scp and ftp 2. install wondershaper QOS and limit throughput to 32K. These are workarounds, but I'd really like a solution. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hi, all. I'm trying to compile OpenSSH-3.0.2p1 on a Linux libc5 system, and it fails when compiling packet.c with the following: gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -I. -I. -DETCDIR=\"/etc/ssh\" -D_PATH_SSH_PROGRAM=\"/usr/bin/ssh\" -D_PATH_SSH_ASKPASS_DEFAULT=\"/usr/libexec/ssh-askpass\" -D_PATH_SFTP_SERVER=\"/usr/libexec/sftp-server\"

Have you experienced this? What's going on when this occurs? What do I need to do to keep it from occurring? Please advise. Thanks. Dec 4 10:18:17 localhost kernel: e1000: eth1 NIC Link is Down Dec 4 10:18:19 localhost kernel: e1000: eth1 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX Dec 4 10:18:21 localhost kernel: e1000: eth1 NIC Link is Down Dec 4 10:18:23 localhost kernel:

[accidentally was sent to the R-help-owner only; MM] ** when I compile R-0.62.3 on RedHat 5.1, the following messages appear: ... f77 -export-dynamic -o R.binary ... ../lib/libunix.a(dataentry.o): In function `NextEvent': /home/ming/R-0.62.3/src/unix/dataentry.c:1286: undefined reference to `XNextEvent' ../lib/libunix.a(dataentry.o): In function `GetKey':

This is a bit long-winded, but I wanted to share some info .... Regarding my earlier message about a possible race condition with mdadm, I have been doing all sorts of poking around with the boot process. Thanks to a tip from Steven Yellin at Stanford, I found where to add a delay in the rc.sysinit script, which invokes mdadm to assemble the arrays. Unfortunately it didn't help, so it

I didn't see anything on the list about this over the holidays and thought it might be of some interest: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/2006-December/msg00049.html Lots of discussion around this topic on the fedora-legacy-list. -- Jay Leafey - Memphis, TN jay.leafey at mindless.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2005:303-01 Important: sylpheed security update Files available: sylpheed-0.5.0-3.EL21.1.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update --

Good day. Thanks in advance for any help. I have a Tyan S2895 (Thunder K8WE) with 2 275 Opterons and the latest (1.02) bios. It appears to have an nVidia nForce SATA chipset which connects to a 250gb WD Caviar SATA drive. Using the CentOS 4 update 2 x86_64 DVD, the install is peachy until half-way through the "performing post install configuration" bit. Then it hangs forever. I

I am using centos 5 x86_64 AMD64 X2 4200+. I am current on yum update. My machine has two ethernet cards. e1000 (eth0) and forcedeth (eth1) [root at fsdsigns2 ~]# more /etc/modprobe.conf alias eth0 e1000 alias eth1 forcedeth sometimes on boot the forcedeth driver thinks it is eth0: [root at fsdsigns2 ~]# dmesg | grep eth forcedeth.c: Reverse Engineered nForce ethernet driver. Version 0.60.

This is a problem I've had on and off under CentOS5 and CentOS6, with both xen and kvm. Currently, it happens consistently with kvm on 6.5, e.g. with every kernel update. I *think* it generally worked fine with the 6.4 kernels. There are 7 VMs running on a 6.5, x86_64, 8GB RAM host, each with 512MB RAM and using the e1000 NIC. I picked this specific NIC because the default does not allow

Christian Hoffmann <hoffmann@wsl.ch> writes: > I just installed the SuSE distribution of Linux (from Fuerth, Germany). I > would be very interested in learning of a SuSE compatible form of R. > Installing Linux was expressly made to be able to use R :-) > > SuSE (suse@suse.de, http://www.suse.de) is a distribution which is quickly > gaining users for Linux because of