similar to: kpatch (live kernel patching) in CentOS 7.7?

On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 1:42 PM Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: > > > On 10/3/19 1:32 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > Forgive me if this has been answered before and I've missed it. > > > > This https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2206511 says live kernel > patches > > will be available via yum updates as of RHEL 7.7. Is this carried over to

On 10/3/19 9:35 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 at 13:52, Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 1:42 PM Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 10/3/19 1:32 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>>> Forgive me if this has been answered before and

On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 08:18, Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 6:33 AM Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: > > > > > > > On 10/3/19 9:35 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 at 13:52, Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> > > wrote: > > >> > >

I *know* there has been a lot going on, and congratulations on getting CentOS 8 out! But(!), I don't see any updates to CO 7.7.1908 in the "updates" directory on the mirrors I typically use. All the files date from Sept. 14th. Is something broken? -- *Matt Phelps* *Information Technology Specialist, Systems Administrator* (Computation Facility, Smithsonian Astrophysical

On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 9:24 AM Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 08:18, Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 6:33 AM Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/3/19 9:35 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >

On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 6:33 AM Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: > > > On 10/3/19 9:35 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 at 13:52, Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> > wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 1:42 PM Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: > >> > >>> >

This is not your usual "so when is CO 7.8.xxxx coming out?" posts. I'm just curious if the CentOS team is affected by our current world conditions, or is work-from-home modus operandi for the team? (In other words, "when is CO 7.8.xxxx coming out?") -- *Matt Phelps* *Information Technology Specialist, Systems Administrator* (Computation Facility, Smithsonian

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 9:04 AM Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote: > There was a recent thread about Redhat's removal of drivers from LSI > SAS2, it's probably the problem you are facing. > It can be worked around with the help of Elrepo repo. > > > https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2019-October/173682.html > > >

On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 12:08 PM Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> wrote: > > I *know* there has been a lot going on, and congratulations on getting > CentOS 8 out! > > But(!), I don't see any updates to CO 7.7.1908 in the "updates" directory > on the mirrors I typically use. All the files date from Sept. 14th. > > Is something broken? >

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 10:04 AM isdtor <isdtor at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > So the syntax looks to be > > > > > > repo --name=epel --baseurl=nfs://server:/path > > > > > > that colon after server is not a spelling error. > > > https://pykickstart.readthedocs.io/en/latest/kickstart-docs.html#id48 > > > > That seems to work

> Am 08.12.2020 um 15:32 schrieb Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu>: > > This is really, really bad for the majority of us using CentOS. > Of course it is. > Is there any way we can lobby for the reversal of this decision? Remember > that the -devel mailing list, and IRC channels *do not* represent the vast > majority of CentOS users. Most of us are just

I learned from the Centos-devel email list that they aren't sending out email to centos-announce for updates to CentOS 8, but only updating an RSS feed. I think this is a bad idea since no one uses RSS anymore (ducks for cover). What do others here think of this? -- *Matt Phelps* *Information Technology Specialist, Systems Administrator* (Computation Facility, Smithsonian Astrophysical

Red Hat released RHEL 6.9 yesterday. Why isn't CentOS 6.9 out yet? :) -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu

On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 6:26 AM Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: > > > On 10/3/19 2:42 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: > > I have need to use the old network-scripts and not NetworkManager. > > Why? I'd like to understand more about the use case where this is a > requirement. > > > One example we have is qemu virtual machine hosts where setting up the

On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 at 13:52, Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 1:42 PM Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: > > > > > > > On 10/3/19 1:32 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > > Forgive me if this has been answered before and I've missed it. > > > > > > This

Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Le 28/02/2019 ? 04:12, Jobst Schmalenbach a ?crit?: > >> I want to lock in the SDA/SDB/SDC for my drives > > In short : use UUIDs or labels instead of hardcoding /dev/sdX. > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/persistent_block_device_naming Yeah - I strongly believe in labels, given the fact that *no* one can remember a UUID.... mark

I have need to use the old network-scripts and not NetworkManager. I did yum install network-scripts, I have ifcfg-eth0 set for ONBOOT=yes but it is not starting on boot. What have I missed ? Jerry

Johnny, Should we give up hope on this issue? On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com>: > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster < > leonfauster at googlemail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb

Stephen John Smoogen writes: > On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 05:02, isdtor <isdtor at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Is it not possible to use an nfs based repo for kickstart under CentOS 7.5? > > > > E.g. > > > > repo --name=epel --baseurl=file://server/path/to/local/copy/of/epel > > > > So the syntax looks to be > > repo --name=epel

The future of the CentOS Project is CentOS Stream, and over the next year we?ll be shifting focus from CentOS Linux, the rebuild of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), to CentOS Stream, which tracks just ahead of a current RHEL release. CentOS Linux 8, as a rebuild of RHEL 8, will end at the end of 2021. CentOS Stream continues after that date, serving as the upstream (development) branch of Red