similar to: SquidGuard update in EPEL

Le 29/09/2019 ? 18:48, Stephen John Smoogen a ?crit?: > Is there a problem with the version which is in EPEL? No, there isn't. I was just puzzled that there was an update to an application that's been manifestly dormant for more than ten years. -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'?glise - 30730 Montpezat Site : https://www.microlinux.fr Mail : info at

On Mon, 30 Sep, 2019 at 23:47:02 -0700, John Pierce wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 10:26 PM Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote: > > > Le 30/09/2019 ? 17:53, Gwaland a ?crit : > > > looks like it was updated due to a segfault. > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750550 > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253662

On Sun, 29 Sep 2019 at 02:34, Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote: > > Hi, > > The SquidGuard URL redirector has recently been updated in EPEL, and I'm > a bit puzzled. I'm still using SquidGuard on a few local proxy servers > running CentOS 7, because it's a nifty piece of software for filtering > web traffic. > > The project's home page

Le 30/09/2019 ? 17:53, Gwaland a ?crit?: > looks like it was updated due to a segfault. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750550 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253662 Now I'm even more puzzled. Fedora and EPEL sport SquidGuard 1.4.36. Now when you search for "squidguard", this seems to be the project site: * http://squidguard.org/index.html

Hi, I've been working with Squid + SquidGuard for a few years, though only on Slackware. I'm currently transferring my proxy expertise to CentOS 7, and right now I'm having a little problem with that. Squid works perfectly so far as a transparent HTTP + HTTPS cache proxy. The next step is to add SquidGuard, so I installed it and edited the most basic /etc/squid/squidGuard.conf file

In article <dafd6c5f-9676-c4da-8761-619d6f003525 at microlinux.fr>, Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote: > Le 01/10/2019 ?? 09:05, Liam O'Toole a ??crit??: > > [...] > > > > FWIW, the current release has squidguard 1.6 > > https://packages.debian.org/source/stable/squidguard > > And this all begs the question: who's flying this plane?

looks like it was updated due to a segfault. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750550 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253662 On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 1:03 PM Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote: > Le 29/09/2019 ? 18:48, Stephen John Smoogen a ?crit : > > Is there a problem with the version which is in EPEL? > > No, there isn't. > >

Le 01/10/2019 ? 09:05, Liam O'Toole a ?crit?: > [...] > > FWIW, the current release has squidguard 1.6 > https://packages.debian.org/source/stable/squidguard And this all begs the question: who's flying this plane? According to the official website, SquidGuard is dead in the water. Apparently there's still some mysterious maintainer around. Which would be nice, because

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 10:26 PM Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote: > Le 30/09/2019 ? 17:53, Gwaland a ?crit : > > looks like it was updated due to a segfault. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750550 > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253662 > > Now I'm even more puzzled. > > Fedora and EPEL sport SquidGuard

Le 08/03/2018 ? 11:30, hw a ?crit : > The government says you must use squidguard to filter something? The law in France (Code P?nal, article 227-24) states that a public network is not allowed to broadcast messages containing violence, pornography or any content contrary to basic human dignity, which is theoretically punishable with three years of prison or a 75.000 ? fee. So any network

Hi, In our local school we have two servers and roughly 80 clients. The network is 192.168.10.0/255.255.255.0, and DHCP+DNS is managed by Dnsmasq. School PCs (teachers and management) are registered via MAC address and get an IP address in a specific range: 192.168.10.2 - 192.168.10.50 - management + teachers 192.168.10.201 - 192.168.10.220 - computer room 192.168.10.246 - 192.168.10.247 -

Le 06/03/2018 ? 18:48, hw a ?crit?: > And how do you get a list of IPs from which data could be retrieved > which the students are not supposed to see? > > How is this done anyway, does the government give out a list of URLs > or IPs which you are required to block?? If not, what if you overlook > something? Here's some information.

Hi, Is there any way to deactivate the redirection to a mirror when using the third-party EPEL repository ? Our network uses a transparent HTTP/HTTPS proxy with a local AC. We can create exceptions for sites like centos.org or download.fedoraproject.org, but whenever we want to install a package from EPEL, the mirror redirection causes an error due to redirection. Any suggestions ? Niki --

Hi, I'm regularly getting spammed by my own servers, with the following message: /etc/cron.hourly/0yum-hourly.cron: Not using downloaded epel/repomd.xml because it is older than what we have: Current : Sat Sep 12 19:05:04 2020 Downloaded: Thu Sep 10 19:12:19 2020 How can I make this nonsense stop? Cheers, Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de

On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 1:06 PM Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote: > Le 08/04/2018 ? 13:54, Nicolas Kovacs a ?crit : > > As far as I can tell, there would be several solutions to this problem. > > > > 1. Ask the EPEL maintainers to keep the application up-to-date. > > > > 2. Patch the darn thing so I don't get the annoying popup. > > >

Hi, I''m trying to get Shorewall to work with Squidguard on a machine which is acting as the fileserver, firewall, proxy server and internet access point for a small network. The network at present consists of the fileserver/firewall machine running RH 8.0, two Linux boxes running various RH distributions and two windows virtual machines running on the other machines under Win4Lin.

Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > I've been working with Squid + SquidGuard for a few years, though only > on Slackware. I'm currently transferring my proxy expertise to CentOS 7, > and right now I'm having a little problem with that. > > Squid works perfectly so far as a transparent HTTP + HTTPS cache proxy. > > The next step is to add SquidGuard, so I

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 11:47:02PM -0700, John Pierce wrote: ... > > > > Now when you search for "squidguard", this seems to be the project site: > > > > * http://squidguard.org/index.html > > > > This page hasn't been updated in ages and sports the "NEW" version 1.3. > > > > So apparently the project has been developed

Le 04/12/2018 ? 23:10, Gordon Messmer a ?crit : > The system should boot normally if you disconnect sdb. Have you > tried that? Unfortunately that didn't work. The boot process stops here: [OK] Reached target Basic System. Now what ? -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'?glise - 30730 Montpezat Site : https://www.microlinux.fr Blog :

Hi list, Has anyone here use SquidGuard for their Squid proxy running in CentOS4.4 to block list of bad sites? Is the RPM available using yum? Any feedback using this software appreciated. Thank you very much. junji linux registered user #253162 Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com