similar to: Postfix vs. Thunderbird on Mac OS

Hi, I'm currently fine-tuning my mail server (Postfix and Dovecot on CentOS 7). SPF, DKIM and DMARC work fine, now I'd like to limit the spam tsunami. Besides the official Postfix documentation, I've read a few articles about Postfix spam restrictions, namely these : https://www.linuxbabe.com/mail-server/block-email-spam-postfix https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/postfix_restrictions

Hi list, I have been getting the following types of log messages Jan 30 08:22:33 ndgonline postfix/smtpd[30538]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[71.46.229.50]: 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [71.46.229.50]; from=<DWoodman at orangebankfl.com> to=<rkampen at ndgonline.net> proto=ESMTP helo=<mail.floridianbank.com> a rdns check shows all is well

Hi list, I have noted over the last week or so my DNS servers are dumping lots of messages for bogus domain lookups. Examining the postfix queue with postqueue -p: I see many (Host or domain name not found. Name service error for name=bdgiedjhea.po6e4ina.com type=MX: Host not found, try again) Jake at bdgiedjhea.po6e4ina.com My question - why does this

Helo hostname MUST have resolvable hostname. Crazy or not, but i use this. The _access-allow parts for server you really trust. smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination, check_client_access cidr:/etc/postfix/check_client_access-allow.cidr, reject_unknown_hostname, reject_non_fqdn_hostname, reject_invalid_hostname,

hello list hello dovecot network hello all the reader here is a sieve script this ######################################## require ["fileinto","regex","comparator-i;ascii-numeric","reject","relational"]; # rule:[spammanage] if header :value "ge" :comparator "i;ascii-numeric" ["X-Spam-score"] ["500"] {

Hello to all members. I am using Dovecot for 5 years, but this is my first post here. I am aware of the various autoresponder scripts for vacation autoreplies (I am using Virtual Vacation 3.1 by Mischa Peters). I have an issue with auto-replies - it is vulnerable to spamming with forged email address. Forging can be prevented with several Postfix settings, which I did in the past - but was forced

All i have is : smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated   I disabled the unknown restriction due to lots of customers of me are missing PTR records, which needs to be set bij the internet provider. So they got blocked, i had to remove these.   The Helo check is often on the IT department can adjust them selfs. And most spammers have incorrect helo’s

I have had the same email address since 1997 (when microsoft stole bob.com from me thanks to network solutions...) In the early days I of course was free with my email and used it everwhere. Fast forward to 2012, some 15 years later. woof..the amount of spam sent to me has always just kept getting worse and worse. On my centos 5 server I just used sendmail with spamassassin and it killed a

Hi, I have CentOS 7 running on half a dozen public servers. For some stuff like automatic updates using yum-cron, I have Postfix installed with a relatively basic configuration. This allows me to send important notifications to my mail address info at microlinux.fr. When there's a batch of updates, I get one mail per machine, so I can check quickly if everything went OK without having to

I am I a situation where I have to wipe my remote server and reinstall, Its been a while since I built a server and I am not as sharp as I use to be I am running FreeBSD 12.1. well at least the server is... I am getting constant authentication errors like Dec 28 22:10:18 triggerfish dovecot[21809]: imap-login: Aborted login (auth failed, 1 attempts in 6 secs): user=<jason at example.com>,

Le 28/02/2018 ? 22:32, Itamar Reis Peixoto a ?crit?: > I recommend everyone in France to spend their money on a school with > free internet. I'm not sure I understand. Our students sure don't pay for accessing the Internet. > > please tell us the name of your school's. https://www.scholae.fr/ > > the https exist's because we want freedom and privacy on

I have a postfix mail server with sql authentication and I want to implement sieve on it. Sieve is working relative good, rules who contain 'fileinto' are executed perfectly. The problem is the redirect to other servers. I configured a rule in Sieve to redirect any email containing "redirect" in subject to a specified foreign destination. # So practically a email coming from

Hi Buddies, I have 2 servers running dovecot + postfix for pop/imap users. The users mailbox are in a Nfs storage. The load of server is ranging at 3.0 to 15.0. I really dont know what happened.. I read a lot about tuning of dovecot, and the changes are applied, how you can see. The Hardware of server is really good! The host have 8GB of mem and 2 sockets with 2 cores anyone. The server receives

hello all reader hello list hello centos network since I've installed dovecot deliver. e-mails no longer pass through amavisd. amavisd no longer work. c is to say I have no anti-spam and anti virus my postconf and dovecot -n [root at r13151 ~]# postconf -n alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases , hash:/etc/postfix/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases , hash:/etc/postfix/aliases body_checks =

OK, not sure what happened, my response was rejected by Centos: Reason: There was an error while attempting to deliver your message with [Subject: "RE: [CentOS] Mail has quit working"] to centos at centos.org. MTA p3plwbeout03-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net received this response from the destination host IP - 208.100.23.70 - 554 , 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host

hello all reader hello list hello dovecot network since I've installed dovecot deliver. e-mails no longer pass through amavisd. amavisd no longer work. c is to say I have no anti-spam and anti virus my postconf and dovecot -n [root at r13151 ~]# postconf -n alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases , hash:/etc/postfix/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases , hash:/etc/postfix/aliases body_checks

My apologies if I'm posting the wrong place, or am asking a common question. All my looking so far hasn't turned up anything very useful in knowing what to look at, or what to modify. --- CentOS 5, running BIND 9.3.6 i386 Hardware: P4, 2.8Ghz, 1G memory Sata drives - non mirrored etc. Load is light, usually under 0.1 -- This box is running Postfix as our mail server. BIND (9.3.6)

Hi, Procmail, it can move messages around based on many rules. Use something like this in postfix main.cf: mailbox_command = /usr/bin/procmail-wrapper -o -a $DOMAIN -d $LOGNAME And something like this in /etc/procmailrc or $HOME/.procmailrc SPAMDIR=$HOME/Maildir/.Spam/ :0fw | /usr/bin/spamc :0 * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes $SPAMDIR DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/ ORGMAIL=$HOME/Maildir/ DROPPRIVS=yes HTH --

I realize this is slightly off topic, but I've noticed recently that I've been unable to preform RBL lookups using the the zen and sbl spamhaus RBL lists. Currently using Zimbra Collaboration Suite using CentOS 5 I'm seeing logs showing the following output. [root at phantom ~]# cat /var/log/zimbra.log | grep spamhaus Jul 18 13:07:12 phantom postfix/smtpd[27001]: warning:

Dear All, its a offtopic question but really apprecite if someone would advise n help i have been running a mil server with sendmail and have sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org as my dnsbl. i had other servers which are alredy out now that is relays.ordb.org and dsbl.org have already been out of my sendmail config. any one knows of ny other servers i could add in my sendmail config apprecite ur help