similar to: CentOS7 sometimes don't detect NIC after reboot

Dne 17.9.2019 v 14:02 Mauricio Tavares napsal(a): > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 7:06 AM Miroslav Geisselreiter <mg at intar.cz> wrote: >> I have brand new PC with this components: >> CPU Intel? Pentium G5400, LGA1151 >> motherboard ASUS PRIME B360M-C >> 16 GB RAM >> HDD 2x ADATA SSD 256GB XPG GAMMIX S11, PCIe Gen3x4 M.2 2280 (RAID1) >> NIC Intel X550-T1

Dne 17.9.2019 v 15:25 Mauricio Tavares napsal(a): > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 9:11 AM Miroslav Geisselreiter <mg at intar.cz> wrote: >> Dne 17.9.2019 v 14:02 Mauricio Tavares napsal(a): >>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 7:06 AM Miroslav Geisselreiter <mg at intar.cz> wrote: >>>> I have brand new PC with this components: >>>> CPU Intel? Pentium G5400,

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 9:11 AM Miroslav Geisselreiter <mg at intar.cz> wrote: > > Dne 17.9.2019 v 14:02 Mauricio Tavares napsal(a): > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 7:06 AM Miroslav Geisselreiter <mg at intar.cz> wrote: > >> I have brand new PC with this components: > >> CPU Intel? Pentium G5400, LGA1151 > >> motherboard ASUS PRIME B360M-C >

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 7:06 AM Miroslav Geisselreiter <mg at intar.cz> wrote: > > I have brand new PC with this components: > CPU Intel? Pentium G5400, LGA1151 > motherboard ASUS PRIME B360M-C > 16 GB RAM > HDD 2x ADATA SSD 256GB XPG GAMMIX S11, PCIe Gen3x4 M.2 2280 (RAID1) > NIC Intel X550-T1 Ethernet Converged Network Adapter > > I installed CentOS 7 and two

Am 17.09.2019 um 13:05 schrieb Miroslav Geisselreiter: > I have brand new PC with this components: > CPU Intel? Pentium G5400, LGA1151 > motherboard ASUS PRIME B360M-C > 16 GB RAM > HDD 2x ADATA SSD 256GB XPG GAMMIX S11, PCIe Gen3x4 M.2 2280 (RAID1) > NIC Intel X550-T1 Ethernet Converged Network Adapter > > I installed CentOS 7 and two NICs were detected: > eno1 (on

Dne 17.9.2019 v 16:14 Ralf Prengel napsal(a): > > > Am 17.09.2019 um 13:05 schrieb Miroslav Geisselreiter: >> I have brand new PC with this components: >> CPU Intel? Pentium G5400, LGA1151 >> motherboard ASUS PRIME B360M-C >> 16 GB RAM >> HDD 2x ADATA SSD 256GB XPG GAMMIX S11, PCIe Gen3x4 M.2 2280 (RAID1) >> NIC Intel X550-T1 Ethernet Converged Network

I am having problems getting my 64-bit Debian Squeeze (Xen version 4.0, Linux Kernel 2.6.32) dom0 to recognize a harddrive connected to a secondary sata controller. My motherboard is a Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4 and has two sata controllers. The first is controlled by an Intel X79 chipset and the second is controlled by a Marvell 88SE9172 chip. During the initial install of Debian everything is fine and

How do I check if the proper sata drivers are being loaded? If they are not what can I do other then rebuilding the kernel? Thank you in advance, Randy _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

I am trying to get a pv_ops dom0 working for testing, but I am running into an elf_init error: (XEN) *** LOADING DOMAIN 0 *** (XEN) elf_init: not an ELF binary Full output attached. >From what I have read on the mailing lists, it seems that it is usually a problem with either grub or a corrupt dom0 kernel. Attached is my kernel config (2.6.28-rc6-tip). I followed the instructions on:

Hello , I'm new here but I hope I can describe my problem exactly. I'm trying to get my DVI-Monitor to work with nouveau. The monitor is automatically reported as not connected. LVDS is detected. Forcing it on Xorg.conf didn't work, KMS does: video=DVI-D-1:1920x1200e video=LVDS-1:d X started with 1024x768, but could switch by xrandr to 1920x1200. The viewed picture now is

I just installed centos 5.5 x86_64 on a new HP laptop. It has the core i5 processor. only 1 cpu is detected should be 2. This has happened before. Is upstream not keeping up with new processors released and updating the kernel? I'd rather not go through the process again of putting a newer kernel on the machine and having something different out there than "stock" centos. Jerry

Did a ''git pull'' a few minutes ago and tried to rebuild my kernel and was given this error: make CHK include/linux/version.h CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-x86 CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh CHK include/linux/compile.h CC drivers/acpi/acpica/hwsleep.o drivers/acpi/acpica/hwsleep.c: In function

Hi, I'm about to buy new video card, and was looking at ATI PCI-E Radeon X550. However, I don't see that particular chipset mentioned anywhere in docs. The X300 is there, as well as X600 and X800. Does anybody have Radeon X550 card running under CentOS 4? With 3D acceleration? Thanks, Aleksandar Milivojevic ---------------------------------------------------------------- This

Hi, I have been receiving messages on a new DomU''s kern.log. I''ve done a lot of googling, but haven''t came up with anything very useful, at least not in a Xen context. I was wondering if anyone had any suggestions about what could be wrong. From everything I have read, there should be a stack trace included, but I am not seeing one. Thanks in advance, Ian. on

On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 11:01 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > Please can you also post Xen's own dmesg (from "xl dmesg"). Please boot with loglvl=all on the hypervisor command line for this too. Ian.

Konrad, et al, I am seeing visual corruption (almost like an interlacing problem) with i915 under Xen on some platforms using linux-3.8. See attached file for an example of the visual corruption. This particular platform is an HP Elitebook 2540p The same kernel and ramdisk, when booted as native linux does not show this corruption. dmesg is attached, as well (out.txt) - but I did not see

Hi, I am having problems with the nouveau driver from Debian. Can I get help here? Cheers

Ian Campbell <ijc at hellion.org.uk> writes: #Please boot with loglvl=all on the hypervisor command line for this too. No problem Ian, Here are some results with (now) the latest BIOS version 41. (was version 35) This is a fresh new install of Debian "Testing" non production server. Just wanted to run some test domU's. Changing USB ports, no effect. I even tried a different

> What do you think about virtio-nvme+vhost-nvme? What would be the advantage over virtio-blk? Multiqueue is not supported by QEMU but it's already supported by Linux (commit 6a27b656fc). To me, the advantage of nvme is that it provides more than decent performance on unmodified Windows guests, and thanks to your vendor extension can be used on Linux as well with speeds comparable to

> What do you think about virtio-nvme+vhost-nvme? What would be the advantage over virtio-blk? Multiqueue is not supported by QEMU but it's already supported by Linux (commit 6a27b656fc). To me, the advantage of nvme is that it provides more than decent performance on unmodified Windows guests, and thanks to your vendor extension can be used on Linux as well with speeds comparable to