similar to: why windows 10 can't access centos samba

I update centos's samba to 4.8.3-6. My windows 10 is professional, whose version is 1803. I still can't access samba. Do I need update my windows 10 to 1903? andrew At 2019-09-12 17:45:10, "anax" <anax at ayni.com> wrote: > > >On 12/09/2019 11.09, qw wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> I can access centos's samba via windows 7, but fail

Hi, windows 7 supports smb3. If centos's samba server suport smb3, how to make windows 10 support smb3 too? Thanks! Regards Andrew At 2019-09-13 15:47:34, "John Hodrien" <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk> wrote: >On Thu, 12 Sep 2019, me at tdiehl.org wrote: > >> Why? This is NOT necessary for win 10 to work. I do not even know if it will >> work with

On 12/09/2019 12.46, qw wrote: > > > I update centos's samba to 4.8.3-6. My windows 10 is professional, whose version is 1803. I still can't access samba. Do I need update my windows 10 to 1903? > > > andrew > > > > > > > > At 2019-09-12 17:45:10, "anax" <anax at ayni.com> wrote: >> >> >> On 12/09/2019

Hi strange behaviour of iptables on a centos 7.0 machine: The following rule is in the iptables of said machine: [root at myserver ~]# iptables -L -v -n --line-numbers |grep 175\. 9 9 456 DROP all -- * * 175.44.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 [root at myserver ~]# The corresponding enty in /etc/sysconfig/iptables looks like: [root at myserver ~]# grep 175 /etc/sysconfig/iptables

Dear all, Le 07.09.2015 à 15:52, soonerdave a écrit : > Windows 10 will try to negotiate SMB3_11, which Samba4 doesn't yet support > except in the current 4.3 release candidate. I suspect for now disabling > SMB2/3 on the Windows 10 client is your best, if not ideal, option. > > Instructions for doing.this can be found > here: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2696547

Hi, all. I'm intending to install CentOS 7 on a HP Elitebook 8460p. Does anybody have any experience of this? Many thanks for any help. Cheers, Phil...

Op 28-01-15 om 17:20 schreef Marcelo Ricardo Leitner: > On 28-01-2015 11:15, Patrick Bervoets wrote: >> I have a C6 server acting as a kvm-host. >> >> When connecting with ssh the console is extremely slow and hangs for >> minutes at a time. Connecting to this server is not the problem. >> >> If I use: ssh root at host "whatever" I got immediate

Hi! I have a Samba server version 4.1.11 running on Ubuntu Server 14.04. I cannot connect from Windows 10 (but I can from Windows 7). The server and the clients are not on the same LAN. The error message given by Windows is that the server is online but not responding. However the Samba logs say otherwise. I have attached the logs for a failed connection attempt from Windows 10, and those for

Hello, How secure is SMB3 over Internet? I see that Microsoft Azure is doing SMB3 shares over internet so they seem to think it's secure. Does the SAMBA team recommend this type of scenario OR do they recommend instead running it over a SSH tunnel/VPN?

Hi All, The man page for smb.conf says that 'client max protocol = default' is the same as 'client max protocol = NT1' for the HEAD samba version. Is there some reason I should not change that to SMB3? Thanks! Chad.

On 12/09/2019 11.09, qw wrote: > Hi, > > > I can access centos's samba via windows 7, but fail via windows 10. Why? > > > Thanks! > > > Regards > > > Andrew > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Hi Andrew No problem here

On Thu, 12 Sep 2019, John Hodrien wrote: > On Thu, 12 Sep 2019, qw wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I can access centos's samba via windows 7, but fail via windows 10. Why? > > I'm pretty sure this is because the default Samba config doesn't enable SMB2. > > Make sure this is set in your smb.conf and I think you should be good: > > [global] > max

On 03/08/2016 10:59 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 8 March 2016 at 09:22, anax <anax at ayni.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 03/08/2016 09:43 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >> >>> On 8 Mar 2016 07:36, "anax" <anax at ayni.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi >>>> strange behaviour of iptables on a centos 7.0

Hi, I am facing issue stoping NetworkManager to update resolv.cfg, I am using below configuration for eth0 interface: TYPE=Ethernet BOOTPROTO=dhcp DEFROUTE=yes IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no IPV6INIT=yes IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no IPV6_ADDR_GEN_MODE=stable-privacy NAME=eth0 UUID=93b90a46-dab5-4a67-8fd0-fefe8874a8b9 DEVICE=eth0 ONBOOT=no PEERDNS=no PEERROUTES=yes

On 03/08/2016 09:43 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 8 Mar 2016 07:36, "anax" <anax at ayni.com> wrote: >> >> Hi >> strange behaviour of iptables on a centos 7.0 machine: >> The following rule is in the iptables of said machine: >> >> [root at myserver ~]# iptables -L -v -n --line-numbers |grep 175\. >> 9 9 456 DROP all --

Hi Rob did you ever try sith master-pdf-editor? http://code-industry.net/free-pdf-editor.php The functionality you require in AR may be available from master-pdf-editor as well... suomi On 01/01/2017 07:11 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: > On 01/01/17 04:35, johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be wrote: >> Hello All, >> >> I can't get Adobe Reader to run stable on Centos7, when trying

Running CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908. Have Samba running as our fileserver on our (mostly) Windows network. Ran my "normal" yum updates today, and Samba was upgraded (last updates were on 8/10/2019). I was on 4.8.3 before; now it's 4.9.1: Updated samba-4.8.3-6.el7_6.x86_64 @updates Updated samba-client-4.8.3-6.el7_6.x86_64

Hi, I have a ZFS dataset that has sync writes disabled (setting sync=disabled) which means that it will only do async writes, and sync requests get converted to async writes. The ZFS dataset is hosted on a single Samsung 840 Pro 512GB SATA SSD. I have this same dataset served as a Samba share, using Proxmox VE 6. Samba version 4.9.5-Debian (Buster), protocol SMB3_11. Kernel version 5.0.15. To

Hai, ... > > As I said, where is the fault, is it something that Windows 10 is or > isn't doing, or is it Samba ? > > Well, we cannot change Windows, so on that basis, I think you should > make a Samba bug report and let it work through the system. > > Rowland Well, yes, we can change windows, by allowing/disallowing SMB1. Which might help in detecting whats

I am running several Solaris 11 file servers with samba 4.7.6. This is an AD domain but the domain controllers are Win 2008 R2 and Windows 2012 R2. All users and groups in AD have unix uidNumbers and gidNumbers assigned. On one file server, I am having problems where some users can not access files , via windows, to which they should have access as the group member. For example,