similar to: Mailbox for Sysadmin

Le 01/09/2019 ? 13:19, Administrator a ?crit?: > Every self-respecting Admin should have a mailbox in worthy domain. Do > you have it already? If no - go to https://nox11.com choose one and > start new life Every self-respecting admin hates spammers. -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'?glise - 30730 Montpezat Site : https://www.microlinux.fr Mail : info

On 2018-11-10 03:22, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 11/09/2018 12:07 PM, Warren Young wrote: >> On Nov 9, 2018, at 9:22 AM, Vic Chester <vcsubscriptions at gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> https://protonmail.com/ >> >> Aside from semi-charitable organizations like that, I wouldn?t expect >> good free email service to exist. It?s seriously

Hello, Thanks to some nice people on here and other forums I have pretty much finalized my whole mail system on centos 6.x. With all the checks, greylisting, dev/null of any 8+ spam level SA, I still get a few mails. It seems like everytime I enable a new protectant, the mail stops spamming for a few hours...then the spammers decide I am worthy of using better methods against me..and more

Hi, There are currently two competing CentOS groups on Facebook. The "main" group is managed by a small group of autocrats with very unilateral communication skills. The other one is not managed at all, judged by the amount of non-CentOS-related stuff published there (Ubuntu tutorials, Windows games, cheap Ray-Ban sunglasses). I was a bit frustrated by this state of things, the more so

Le 08/03/2018 ? 11:30, hw a ?crit : > The government says you must use squidguard to filter something? The law in France (Code P?nal, article 227-24) states that a public network is not allowed to broadcast messages containing violence, pornography or any content contrary to basic human dignity, which is theoretically punishable with three years of prison or a 75.000 ? fee. So any network

On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 1:06 PM Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote: > Le 08/04/2018 ? 13:54, Nicolas Kovacs a ?crit : > > As far as I can tell, there would be several solutions to this problem. > > > > 1. Ask the EPEL maintainers to keep the application up-to-date. > > > > 2. Patch the darn thing so I don't get the annoying popup. > > >

Hi, Some people have suggested maintaining black lists and white lists to avoid spammers and allow legitimate callers into the network. However, the problem with this method is that the spammer's IP address might change due to DHCP. Today a spammer might get aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd and lets say that I put this address in my blacklist. To my annoyance, tomorrow a legitimate caller might get

I asked the moderators about it. This is the reply "Other moderators have looked into this a bit and may be able to shed more light on it. This is a "new" tactic where the spammers appear to reply to the r-help post. They are not, however, going through the r-help server. It also seems that this does not happen to everyone. I am not sure how you can automatically block the

On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 05:53:28AM -0700, John Pierce wrote: > On Sun, Jun 7, 2020, 2:47 AM Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote: > > > .... > > My aim is simply to eliminate as much spam as possible (that is, before > > adding > > SpamAssassin) while keeping false positives to a minimum. > > > > The one thing that stopped the most spam on

No problem. Another suggestion would be to simply validate user input like most websites, and reject invalid submissions immediately, rather than blocking the user's account. I don't know what kind of spambots you are up against, but unless they are very intelligent I doubt they'll be able to understand a message like "You submitted a bug with no body text, please enter something

Ah, thank you for that explanation. I somehow didn't catch that my Bugzilla account had been disabled by a human. "Common pattern is to post ... something copied from a generic bug report" - that sounds very annoying. Frederick On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 11:54:11AM +0100, peter dalgaard wrote: > Unfortunately, the spammers in question appear to be human (of sorts). > >

I got some spam emails after my last post to the list, and the emails did not seem to go through r-help. The spammers may be subscribed to the r-help, or they get the poster emails from some of the web copies of this list (nabble or similar). Peter On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Ulrik Stervbo <ulrik.stervbo at gmail.com> wrote: > I asked the moderators about it. This is the reply

Hi all, Site has been hacked? Bad SPAM arriving

I second this. I find it rather ironic that one would try to initiate discussion of an open source operating system and environment in a proprietary walled off world. This seems rather antithetical to the whole intent of centos. - Richard ------------ Original Message ------------ > Date: Monday, October 09, 2017 12:14:55 +0100 > From: Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> > > I

The problem is not specific to this list. Any kind of public list may mean that other subscribers (or even the whole world) can see your email address. So whenever you mail to a (public) list there is a good chance that afterwards, you will get more spam. Not really much can be done about it, at least not on the side of the list, since any of the subscribers may be a spammer, who can know... All

Hi! This happened to me also! I just got a spam email just after posting and then in following days I got obnoxious spam emails in my spam filter. As the others, I think that there is some kind of bot subscribed to the list, but also perhaps a spider or crawler monitoring the R-Help archive and getting email addresses there. Nabble is a possibility too. > On 17 Apr 2018, at 21:50, Peter

No, I do not use gmail, still got dirty spam email twice. -----Original Message----- From: R-help [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Fowler, Mark Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 12:32 PM To: Luis Puerto; Peter Langfelder Cc: R-Help ML R-Project; Neotropical bat risk assessments Subject: Re: [R] Hacked [Attention: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments

On 12/10/15 08:27, VigneshDhanraj G wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > Thanks for the help. > > Yes, Joined to the domain, ftp uses pam authentication. After > upgrading samba i found ftp pam authentication not working > > /etc/pam.d/ftp contains > > #%PAM-1.0 > auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_smbpass.so > auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so

Hi, This is probably a bit OT, but here goes. I've been running our local school's mail server since 2013, with mail addresses for school staff and some teachers. The server is running CentOS 7 with Postfix and Dovecot, and it's a nice no-bullshit configuration with SPF, DKIM and DMARC. The school sends quite a lot of email out to parents, and sometimes, mail gets rejected:

I'm petty sure I messed up attributions, so am deleting them. >> I believe this is a DMARC issue. Yahoo, among other places, has set >> their dmarc records to p=reject: >> So, if your mail hosting provider enforces dmarc,(gmail does) and you >> get mail from a list that doesn't rewrite the headers, and people >> from places like yahoo post to the list,