similar to: DHCP and no network for long time

On Dec 2, 2014, at 2:10 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: >> Think 'laptop'. > > Why would you need a static IP to stick to a laptop? Or have > multiple NICs on one? Wired and WiFi. If you configure a static IP with the wired Ethernet plugged in, you probably want that static IP to continue being used when you unplug the Ethernet cable and NM

Hallo, thanks but this doesn t work here allthough most tips and hints are using this parameter. Any idea how to debug ? Thanks Ralf Von meinem iPad gesendet > Am 29.01.2019 um 18:08 schrieb Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole at gmail.com>: > >> On 2019-01-29, Ralf Prengel <ralf.prengel at rprengel.de> wrote: >> Hallo, >> >> I try to configure my

hi, I wrote a patch to openssh sshd.c which enables "exponential backoff", so that an attacker cannot brute force your password by making hundreds of login attempts. here is the code: http://sam.nipl.net/sshd-backoff/ An attacker who fails to login is locked out (by IP address) for 1 minute, and the lockout period doubles for each failed login after that. Normally three logins are

I'm accustomed to systems where even the first failed login attempt incurs a 5 second delay. I don't think that's too harsh, but everyone has their own needs and considerations. This could be made configurable. -Jay -----Original Message----- From: Rick Jones [mailto:rick.jones2 at hp.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 8:09 PM To: Jay Libove Cc: openssh-unix-dev at

On Dec 2, 2014, at 2:34 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: >> On Dec 2, 2014, at 2:10 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> Think 'laptop'. >>> >>> Why would you need a static IP to stick to a laptop? Or have

We ship servers to remote sites, which are rarely staffed with techs familiar with Linux. We have them tell us the static IP configuration for the box before we ship it, then we set it up for them here and ship it out to the site, where they just plug it in, turn it on, and walk away. That?s the ideal, anyway. What often happens in reality is either: 1. They give us incorrect static IP info,

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 03:46:52PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > Networking isn't really controlled by systemd but by NetworkManager. I > usually just yum remove NetworkManager* and then everything works just > as it did in CentOS 6. Note: NetworkManager is in CentOS6 too, and is part of the default workstation install. The NM in CentOS7 is a bit more polished than the NM

Hi folks I have my Linksys WUSB54GC USB wifi card already working. Now I have another issue. Accidentally I tuned off my AP, and when switched it on again my wireless link is still down. I have to unplug the USB card and plug it again to get it working again. I'm new in wireless matter but this doesn't sounds logical to me. What if I loose the link for whatever reason? Should I have to

Le 18/02/2020 ? 12:28, Anand Buddhdev a ?crit?: > Neither. The DNS configuration should not normally be bound to a > specific interface, so don't configure it with any interface. If you do, > and that interface goes down, your DNS config also disappears. I would like to do that very much, only NetworkManager makes you jump through burning loops to do so. With network-scripts, it

We recently completed our Samba 3 to Samba 4 transition without too many serious problems but one rather annoying issue has cropped up since the migration. Network shares on our file server become disconnected overnight, whether idle or not. This was never a problem with Samba 3 but since upgrading Samba on the server to version 4 and joining it to the Samba 4 AD domain this problem is

Hi all, I used to manage network through /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-* Most of my use case are vlans (ie: eth0.1) an aliases (ie: eth1:3) My context in headless VMs (no DE, no Xorg, no GUI) With CentOS7 and systemd: is it still managed with /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-* ? For the mount component, I found that systemd kind of "sources" /etc/fstab and converts it to

Hi everyone, I'm running some code containing an outer and inner loop, to fill cells in a 2500x1500 results matrix. I left my program running overnight, and it was still running when I checked 17 hours later. I have tested the operation on a smaller matrix and it executes fine, so I believe there is nothing wrong with the code. I was just wondering if this is normal program execution speed

On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 6:26 AM Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: > > > On 10/3/19 2:42 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: > > I have need to use the old network-scripts and not NetworkManager. > > Why? I'd like to understand more about the use case where this is a > requirement. > > > One example we have is qemu virtual machine hosts where setting up the

On Mon, December 1, 2014 16:48, Les Mikesell wrote: > > Is there anyone who has more than a few boxes at more than one > location who _doesn't_ have this issue? I'd like to see a FAQ or > something by whoever designed the network configuration system about > how they planned for it to work (with and without GUI availability). > Likewise for what is supposed to happen

When we make a TCP connection we have to make multiple underlying connect(2) calls, once for each address returned by getaddrinfo. Unfortunately this meant that we lost the errno from any of these calls: $ nbdsh -c 'h.connect_tcp ("localhost", "nbd")' nbd.Error: nbd_connect_tcp: connect: localhost:nbd: could not connect to remote host This commit saves the errno from

Have recently purchased a MGE Nova 1100 UPS and am trying to get running on netBSD. Configuration netBSD 3.0 amd64 libusb 0.1.10a nut 2.0.3 Built & installed libusb Built kernel with ugen device and uhid removed Build & install nut-2.0.3 with usb Chmod /dev/ugen1 etc to allow access by nut user. Ups.conf [MGENova] driver = newhidups port = auto

On 21.04.2015 16:46, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 04/21/2015 08:54 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 03:46:52PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: >>> Networking isn't really controlled by systemd but by NetworkManager. I >>> usually just yum remove NetworkManager* and then everything works just >>> as it did in CentOS 6. >>

Le 18/02/2020 ? 17:43, Jonathan Billings a ?crit?: > According to 'man nm-settings-ifcfg-rh', PEERDNS=no is the old > network-services services mechanism for not changing /etc/resolv.conf, > while in NM it just means never add automatic nameservers to > resolv.conf from DHCP, PPP, VPN, etc. Turning off all DNS > updates means adding: > > [main] > dns=none >

On Dec 1, 2014, at 10:27 PM, Rob Kampen <rkampen at reaching-clients.com> wrote: > Have you put > NM_CONTROLLED="no" > in the ifcfg-eth0 script? How is that better than systemctl stop NetworkManager systemctl disable NetworkManager Again, I?m not really after a way to make this work without NetworkManager. We?ve already got that. What I want is a way to tell

Hello, I have a data.frame with the following format: > head(clin2) Study Subject Type Obs Cycle Day Date Time 1 A001101 10108 ALB 44.00000 98 1 2004-03-11 14:26 2 A001101 10108 ALP 95.00000 98 1 2004-03-11 14:26 3 A001101 10108 ALT 61.00000 98 1 2004-03-11 14:26 5 A001101 10108 AST 33.00000 98 1 2004-03-11 14:26 I want to transform this