similar to: CentOS 8 partiitioning for reliability

I was just given a Dell R720xd with 160 GB memory and 12x 900 GB drives that I plan to deploy as my home mail/file/backup server to replace an aging Supermicro server running CentOS 7. Yeah, it's gross overkill for that and I expect to tuck most of the drives away for spares. How should I RAID and partition this beast for maximum reliability? My current C7 system is using 1 TB of 2 TB

On 7/19/19 11:57 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote: > I was just given a Dell R720xd with 160 GB memory and 12x 900 GB drives that I plan to deploy as my home mail/file/backup server to replace an aging Supermicro server running CentOS 7. Yeah, it's gross overkill for that and I expect to tuck most of the > drives away for spares. > > How should I RAID and partition this beast for maximum

----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: "Nathan Duehr" <denverpilot at me.com> Aan: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Verzonden: Zaterdag 20 juni 2015 02:06:18 Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 + Dell Latitude E6420 laptop = thermalshutdown We also saw some problems with recent Dell machines with ?SpeedStep? or whatever Intel calls their power/speed

> On Dec 1, 2014, at 14:48, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > >> We ship servers to remote sites, which are rarely staffed with techs familiar with Linux. We have them tell us the static IP configuration for the box before we ship it, then we set it up for them here and

Running across some curious stuff with ulimit on CentOS 5.10. We have a non CentOS packaged version of Asterisk (using their packages) that we start at boot time with a typical RC script. Recently it started whining that it couldn't open enough file handles. As we dug further into this, it appears that at boot time, it inherits ulimit from init, which is pretty low: 1024. We've set

> On Jul 28, 2015, at 18:48, Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: > > On 07/29/2015 11:51 AM, Noam Bernstein wrote: >> Hi CentOS developers - I?ve been happily using CentOS for several >> years now, so thanks for all the good work. In the last week, >> however, I noticed that while the items in RHSA-2015:1443 has shown >> up as updates (and announced on

> > On Jul 29, 2015, at 18:20, Nathan Duehr <denverpilot at me.com> wrote: > >> On Jul 28, 2015, at 18:48, Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: >> >> On 07/29/2015 11:51 AM, Noam Bernstein wrote: >>> Hi CentOS developers - I?ve been happily using CentOS for several >>> years now, so thanks for all the good work. In the last week,

We also saw some problems with recent Dell machines with ?SpeedStep? or whatever Intel calls their power/speed management these days. One developer measured a very significant increase in speed after completely disabling support for it in his kernel on multiple Linux variants. I don?t have the details from him, but he said the system went from ?almost unusable on a daily basis?, to, ?I can

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > On Jul 28, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Nathan Duehr <denverpilot at me.com> wrote: >> Equating this to ?vaccination? is a huge stretch. > > Why? It's not just an imperfect analogy it really doesn't work on closer scrutiny. Malware itself is not a good analog to antigens. Vaccinations provide

On Jul 28, 2015, at 8:50 PM, Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: >> On Jul 28, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Nathan Duehr <denverpilot at me.com> wrote: > >>> Equating this to ?vaccination? is a huge stretch. >> >> Why? > > It's not just an imperfect

On 07/30/2015 04:37 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/29/2015 07:27 PM, Nathan Duehr wrote: >>> >>> On Jul 29, 2015, at 18:20, Nathan Duehr <denverpilot at me.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Jul 28, 2015, at 18:48, Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 07/29/2015 11:51 AM, Noam Bernstein wrote:

> On Jul 28, 2015, at 11:27, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > On Jul 25, 2015, at 6:22 PM, Bob Marcan wrote: >> >> 1FuckingPrettyRose >> "Sorry, you must use no fewer than 20 total characters." >> 1FuckingPrettyRoseShovedUpYourAssIfYouDon'tGiveMeAccessRightFuckingNow! >> "Sorry, you cannot use punctuation."

On 07/29/2015 07:27 PM, Nathan Duehr wrote: >> >> On Jul 29, 2015, at 18:20, Nathan Duehr <denverpilot at me.com> wrote: >> >>> On Jul 28, 2015, at 18:48, Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 07/29/2015 11:51 AM, Noam Bernstein wrote: >>>> Hi CentOS developers - I?ve been happily using CentOS for several

On Jul 28, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Nathan Duehr <denverpilot at me.com> wrote: > >> On Jul 28, 2015, at 11:27, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: >> >> So no, your local password quality policy is not purely your own concern. > > Other than DDoS which is a problem of engineering design of how the network operates (untrusted anything can talk to untrusted

On Jul 29, 2015, at 6:19 PM, Nathan Duehr <denverpilot at me.com> wrote: > >> On Jul 28, 2015, at 6:32 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: >> >> Now we have entrenched commercial interests that get paid more when you get DDoS?d. I?ll give you one guess what happens in such a world. > > What happens? Folks have to think harder about connecting

> On Jul 28, 2015, at 6:32 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > On Jul 28, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Nathan Duehr <denverpilot at me.com> wrote: >> >>> On Jul 28, 2015, at 11:27, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: >>> >>> So no, your local password quality policy is not purely your own concern. >> >> Other than

On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 11:45 -0600, Nathan Duehr wrote: > Honestly I don?t know how you guys do it? By not using Windoze ? -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place is in the European Union.

I have restored original configuration and enabled the ignorelb flag. I didn't point out in the original e-mail that after every poweroff the battery percentage is reported at 40% instead of 100% and charges slowly again to 100%. Maybe the UPS sends a LB event and shuts down immediatly as suggested in the manual. But the UPS powered off again. The variables reported by upsc can be found

Hi, We have a NAS server with OpenMediaVault on a Debian system. Mainly we work directly with documents from the LibreOffice and Office tools. Sometimes we note at the opening of a LO document that the file is corrupted and not repairable. We know LO documents are a bunch of files embeded in a compressed ZIP archive. The most of time we can repair them in replacing the corrupted elements

> If there is no message to NUT, I would consider opening a trouble > ticket with Eaton. It is possible that there is a known issue and/or > a firmware upgrade. What kind of message to NUT? In the log (syslog) there is no other message registered. In nut.log only this appears: > Dec 1 08:10:54 openmediavault upsd[5284]: Data for UPS [ellipsemax] > is stale - check driver >