similar to: where are all the Redhat 8 -devel packages?

On 04/07/2019 03:12, Florin Andrei wrote: > I'm probably missing something really simple. > > I've installed an RH8 IAM in AWS and I'm trying to build packages on it. > I've noticed there are many *-devel packages that I cannot install: > > ######################################## > [ec2-user at site1-vpn ~]$ sudo yum install trousers-devel > Last

> > Simon and others > Here's a very simple and hopefully reproducible test-case > > Select as your boot ISO: > ?CentOS-8.1.1911-x86_64-dvd1.iso > Choose to reclaim all space on the disk > Choose 'Minimal Install' as the software selection > Connect yourself to the network (I use a wired connection) > Don't bother creating a user, just provide your

On 11/3/18 11:10 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > I think it may be because Debian uses libgnutls28-dev, whilst Fedora > uses trousers It seems to be a Kodi CMake issue, but I would argue Samba or trousers need to change the name of "read_data" to something more unique if it is going to be an exported shared symbol. Kodi requires libmicrohttpd. The libmicrohttpd library

At 03:46 PM 1/23/2020, Nataraj wrote: >On 1/23/20 2:29 PM, Nataraj wrote: > > > > I would agree.? I have the same behavior in a Redhat 8 development > > system, so it's not a problem with the Centos build.? I have not added > > any repositories other then the Redhat > > codeready-builder-for-rhel-8-x86_64-rpms. I original installed 8.0 and > > have

According to the RHEL docs, package log4j was replaced with package log4j12 in RHEL 8.0. However, when I attempt to install the package in CentOS 8, dnf cannot find it. I have the Base, AppStream, Extras and PowerTools repos enabled. What am I doing wrong? Thanks!

On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 09:30:08 -0500 Michael Cronenworth via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 11/2/18 4:29 PM, Michael Cronenworth via samba wrote: > > > > A compiler bug is also possible. When I have time I'll try to > > rebuild Samba with -O0 to make sure it isn't an optimization issue. > > When I built with -O0 the backtrace changed. >

On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 5:45?PM Tim Dawson <tadawson at tpcsvc.com> wrote: > OK, looking at this on my RH8 test image . . . > > The first thing that I note, is that the *only* thing that needed to be > set to "enabled" in systemctl (IE "systemctl enable ....") is the > nut.target entry. > Tim, can you show output of systemctl list-unit-files| grep nut

Hi everyone, I am using Xen 3.2.1 with the vtpm-12-patch.diff patch posted in [0]. My TPM is an Infineon 1.2. In total I have got three different questions: 1. NVM loading problem at VM creation When I am creating a VM the last few lines of the vtpm_manager output are: TPMD[245]: tpm/tpm_startup.c:45: Info: TPM_Startup(1) Loading NVM. Sending LoadNVM command ERROR[VTPM]: Failed to load

All, While updating my package using dnf update all I allow dnf to clean some package with unresolved dependencies. I would like to reinstall some of them but got an error message "but none of the providers can be installed" during the install process as dnf is trying to install the dependencies. . This happens for some critical package like boost-openmpi-devel (see below for

I need some C8 troubleshooting help with MATE. I'm building a ZFS storage server with a SuperMicro H11SSL motherboard, EPYC 7232 CPU, and 32 GB ECC SDRAM. I installed CentOS 8.1.1911 from the iso as soon as it was released. I'm using the on-board ASPEED VGA video. I installed MATE v1.22 from https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/stenstorp/MATE/. The following packages are installed:

Just as a followup even g++ is broken: [piot at paris ~]$ g++ bash: g++: command not found... Install package 'gcc-c++' to provide command 'g++'? [N/y] y * Waiting in queue... The following packages have to be downgraded: cpp-8.2.1-3.5.el8.x86_64 The C Preprocessor glibc-2.28-42.el8.1.i686 The GNU libc libraries glibc-2.28-42.el8.1.x86_64 The GNU libc libraries

On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:49:29 -0500 Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > What appears is below. Removing dependent packages is required. Removing unused dependencies is optional. dnf remove *subscription* --noautoremove should remove the dependent packages but keep thee unused dependencies if you want them. There's also a setting in /etc/dnf/dnf.conf to set the default behaviour of the autoremove

On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:03:24 -0500 Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > I downloaded a Centos 8 image file : > > CentOS-8.1.1911-x86_64-dvd1.iso > > then I installed it as a kvm guest on a Centos 7 host machine. > > I installed a lot of the software; gui and server to give it a test drive. > > Nothing unusual about what I did that I can identify. And the message came up when

Thanks, Stephen. Just for completeness, the repo I am currently pointing to are [piot at paris opal]$ sudo dnf update CentOS-8 - AppStream 775 kB/s | 5.8 MB 00:07 CentOS-8 - Base 798 kB/s | 4.0 MB 00:05 CentOS-8 - Extras 2.9 kB/s | 2.1 kB 00:00 CentOS-8 - PowerTools 686 kB/s | 2.0 MB 00:02

Hi, I want to upgrade from 8.0 to 8.1 but yum update does not work. Still 8.0 Probably the cause is that I compiled DRBD myself because it was not available for 8.0 when I set up the machine. Now yum update says: Error: ?Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package drbd-pacemaker-9.11.0-1.el8.x86_64 ? - nothing provides pacemaker needed by

I found a src.rpm for 1.1.5-1 for fc8 (not rh8!). I was able to rebuild it on my Centos build system. The rpms are identified as 1.1.5-1.i386.rpm, no el5 or other identification was placed in the files. I don't see how to control this when you rebuild from an existing src.rpm. Interestingly the fc8 designation was lost. I also rebuild it on my fc10 system. It worked, and the rpms have

On 20/06/20 3:50 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Your dates are significantly off > Wikipedia has a delay listed in a table: > > It is, for CentOS-7, For example: > > 7.0 27 > 7.1 26 > 7.2 25 > 7.3 39 > 7.4 43 > 7.5 31 > 7.6 34 > 7.7 42 > 7.8 28 > > > For 6 .. since 6.2, it has bee3n between 10 and 18 days. > > For 8: > > 8.0

I am doing a dnf install package_without_version for instance for g++: [piot at paris opal]$ sudo dnf install gcc-c++ Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:06 ago on Thu 16 Jan 2020 06:45:59 AM CST. Error: Problem: package gcc-8.3.1-4.5.el8.x86_64 requires glibc-devel >= 2.2.90-12, but none of the providers can be installed - package glibc-devel-2.28-72.el8.i686 requires glibc-headers, but

hi, I'm testing the new CentOS 8, seems latest kmod-kvdo-6.2.0.293-50.el8.x86_64 does not contain modules for latest kernel kernel-4.18.0-80.7.1.el8_0.x86_64 ?rpm -ql kmod-kvdo-6.2.0.293-50.el8.x86_64 /etc/depmod.d/kvdo.conf /lib/modules/4.18.0-79.el8+2.x86_64 /lib/modules/4.18.0-79.el8+2.x86_64/extra /lib/modules/4.18.0-79.el8+2.x86_64/extra/kmod-kvdo

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 9:24 PM Ralf Prengel <ralf.prengel at rprengel.de> wrote: > Hallo, > not direkt a solution but I m using a kali rolling release installation on > hard disk. > Works fine here. > > Ralf > > Hi, I am facing the below mentioned issue. #wget -q -O - http://www.atomicorp.com/installers/atomic |sh [root at openvas8 ~]# yum -y install openvas Last