similar to: using RedHat binary packages?

On July 3, 2019 1:43:40 AM CDT, Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel at aixigo.com> wrote: >Hi folks, > >AFAIK CentOS uses RedHat's source RPMs for building the next CentOS >release. I am not sure about the bootstrap procedure and the infra- >structure packages, so lets put these corner cases aside. > >RedHat's "regular" binary and source packages are based on

Hi folks, I've got a moderate number of keys in my ssh config file. Problem: Very often I get an error message like Received disconnect from 2001:db8::8077 port 999:2: Too many authentication failures Authentication failed. AFAIU the ssh-agent is to blame here, trying out all keys he has ever seen. This conflicts with MaxAuthTries 6, set by default on the peer. The solution seems to be to

Hi Darren, On 4/1/19 10:41 AM, Darren Tucker wrote: > On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 08:12, Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel at aixigo.de> wrote: >> I've got a moderate number of keys in my ssh config file. >> Problem: Very often I get an error message like > [...] >> The solution seems to be to set IdentitiesOnly, e.g.: > [...] >> Shouldn't an explicit

Hi folks, Since Docker can bind-mount every .ssh directory I am looking for some way to forbid unprotected private keys. AFAICS it is currently not possible on the sshd to verify that the peer's private key was protected by a passphrase. Can you confirm? Regards Harri

A few of you sounded interested in using it. I haven''t explicitly put a software license on it, so I guess it''s not technically FOSS yet. What licenses are good? BSD? Public Domain? ? Jenna -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/camping-list/attachments/20120502/96b87580/attachment.html>

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12440 Bug ID: 12440 Summary: make "rsync -N" == "rsync --numeric-ids" ? Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at

> On Nov 1, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 09:16:47AM -0700, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: >> The goals of this effort are outlined in the previous email but, in short, we aim to: >> - encourage ongoing contributions to LLVM by preserving low barrier to entry for contributors.

Hello I am developing X application nowI have one question about xorg-xf86-input-keyboard license I checked following file https://github.com/freedesktop/xorg-xf86-input-keyboard/blob/master/COPYING  This file show MIT licene And I found following file  https://github.com/freedesktop/xorg-xf86-input-keyboard/blob/master/src/lnx_kbd.c   * Portions based on kbdrate.c from util-linux 2.9t, which

greetings asterisk users :) ive just deployed version 17 and migrated as best I can to pjsip. I can receive calls, and get to my mailbox prompt, however placing calls seems impossible with the following error on dial: Connected to Asterisk GIT-master-0cde95ec89 currently running on dunkel (pid = 517890) dunkel*CLI> dunkel*CLI> == Setting global variable 'SIPDOMAIN' to

Hi folks, I have configured the imap folder separator to '/' (see below). AFAIU the separator character does not affect the internal folder representation managed by Dovecot, but just the communication between client and imap server. Question is: What is supposed to happen if I try to create a folder named "a.b" in this configuration? Since '.' is not a separator

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi folks, I would like to do incremental backups of the users' maildir directories to a dedicated backup host (using "rsync -SHa" and rsnapshot). Problem is: Dovecot bloats the incremental backup by changing the file names again and again. Is there some way to tell Dovecot to keep meta information separate from the file names? Any

Hi folks, Are there any tricks known to let rsync operate on huge tar files? I've got a local tar file (e.g. 2GByte uncompressed) that is rebuilt each night (with just some tiny changes, of course), and I would like to update the remote copies of this file without extracting the tar files into temporary directories. Any ideas? Regards Harri

Hi folks, maybe I am too blind to see, but would it be possible to avoid extra entries in known_hosts, if the remote host has a signed public key matching a @cert-authority line? Something like Host * HashKnownHosts unsigned This could help to keep the known_hosts file small and yet get all the unsigned public keys in. Just a suggestion, of course. Regards Harri

Hi folks, "--numeric-ids" is a lot of text and easy to be forgotten or misspelled. Since it is a highly important option for making backups of remote systems via rsync I wonder if "-N" could be introduced as an abbreviation for "--numeric-ids"? "-N" is not in use yet, afaics. Just a suggestion, of course. Keep on your good work. Regards Harri

On 19 October 2015 at 18:12, David Chisnall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > One worry is that Apache 2 is incompatible with GPLv2 (is it incompatible with other licenses?) This is interesting, I did not know that... http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html "Despite our best efforts, the FSF has never considered the Apache License to be compatible

Have you considered to introduce a "deduplicate mode" for rsync, replacing duplicate files in the destination directory by hard links? Of course there might be a lot of problems together with this feature, but on creating backups it could help to save a lot of disk space. --link-dest might be interesting in this context, too. Regards Harri

Hi, during our usual work I found it anoying that one can not easily see who logged in using public key authentication. In newer versions of SSH the fingerprint of the public key gets logged, but who can tell which key belongs to whom from his head? So I wrote a little ad-hoc patch (vs. 3.5.p1) so that the comment field on the keys in the authorized_keys[2] files get logged to make life

On 19 October 2015 at 21:03, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > If you are still concerned about this issue, my question is simply: what specific GPL2 compiler (or other user) that might want to use LLVM would be affected? I'm not. I was just pointing to the fact. :) I remember Apple and others have stuck with GPLv2 GCC, but I don't think there was any cross between

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:53 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk > wrote: > On 20 Oct 2015, at 17:46, Daniel Berlin via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > You could ship the non-combined program. > > IE You can ship an llvm jit and a gpl2 program, and jit the program > > on the user's machine. > > NeXT

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Rafael Espíndola <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 19 October 2015 at 13:57, Renato Golin via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> On 19 October 2015 at 18:12, David Chisnall via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> One worry is that Apache 2 is incompatible with GPLv2 (is it