similar to: Alternitives to Firefox...

At Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:39:12 -0400 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > Robert Heller wrote: > > OK, I recently ugraded to the current ESR release of Firefox for CentOS > > 6. > > And I am having problems with the user interface (basically it has become > > hard [for me] to use). > > > > > > What alternitives are there?

At Thu, 27 Jun 2019 04:12:07 +0800 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 2019-06-26 at 15:58 -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > > OK, I recently ugraded to the current ESR release of Firefox for CentOS 6. > > And I am having problems with the user interface (basically it has become > > hard > > [for me] to use).

On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 15:59, Robert Heller <heller at deepsoft.com> wrote: > OK, I recently ugraded to the current ESR release of Firefox for CentOS > 6. > And I am having problems with the user interface (basically it has become > hard > [for me] to use). > > What alternitives are there? (Chrome and Chromium are not possible with > CentOS, and Chrome and Chromium

On 27/06/19 7:58 AM, Robert Heller wrote: > OK, I recently ugraded to the current ESR release of Firefox for CentOS 6. > And I am having problems with the user interface (basically it has become hard > [for me] to use). > > What alternitives are there? (Chrome and Chromium are not possible with > CentOS, and Chrome and Chromium are actually worse). > I have been using Vivaldi

On 2019-06-26 15:39, mark wrote: > Robert Heller wrote: >> OK, I recently ugraded to the current ESR release of Firefox for CentOS >> 6. >> And I am having problems with the user interface (basically it has become >> hard [for me] to use). >> >> >> What alternitives are there? (Chrome and Chromium are not possible with >> CentOS, and Chrome and

Robert Heller wrote: > At Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:39:12 -0400 CentOS mailing list > <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > >> >> Robert Heller wrote: >> >>> OK, I recently ugraded to the current ESR release of Firefox for >>> CentOS >>> 6. >>> And I am having problems with the user interface (basically it has >>> become hard

Robert Heller wrote: > OK, I recently ugraded to the current ESR release of Firefox for CentOS > 6. > And I am having problems with the user interface (basically it has become > hard [for me] to use). > > > What alternitives are there? (Chrome and Chromium are not possible with > CentOS, and Chrome and Chromium are actually worse). > What's the problems? I just

On Wed, 2019-06-26 at 15:58 -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > OK, I recently ugraded to the current ESR release of Firefox for CentOS 6. > And I am having problems with the user interface (basically it has become > hard > [for me] to use). > > What alternitives are there? (Chrome and Chromium are not possible with > CentOS, and Chrome and Chromium are actually worse). >

I need to be able to install CentOS 5.2 on a machine with software RAID (and LVM) setup. I discovered (the hard way!) that there is a bug in the mkinitrd package that causes it to enter an endless loop when there are /dev/mapper/ devices present during the install process. There is a patch to mkinitrd, which I applied and created a new rpm for mkinitrd with this patch applied. I'd like to

I just had to browse to a printer... and with https-use-strict at a server higher up, firefox *would* *not* let me get there. I don't see the circa-2012 printer offering https. Luckily, there was konqueror, which *did* let me go to http://<printer> I just *adore* SmartSoftware that Won't Let You Endanger Yourself.... Reminds me of Jack Williamson's old novel, The Humanoids.

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org > [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Robert Heller > Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 15:46 > To: CentOS mailing list > Cc: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Creating an alternitive install CD for CentOS > 5.2 (w/patched mkinitrd) > > At Sun, 8 Mar 2009 08:47:50 -0400 CentOS

On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:45:54 -0400 (EDT) Robert Heller wrote: > Does FF 78 sound work properly in CentOS 7 and 8? firefox-78.2.0-2.el8_2.x86_64 Working fine for me here on several computers. -- Can we uninstall 2020 and install it again? This one has a virus. MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com

I have two computers: both running CentOS 6.7, 64-bit, with kernel 2.6.32-573.12.1.el6.x86_64. One is a laptop with an 2 core Intel processor and the other is a desktop machine with a 4 core AMD processor. Both with selinux enabled. I have a USB serial port device (a RR-CirKits LCC-Buffer USB). On the desktop I am getting this error: sauron.deepsoft.com% sudo minicom Device /dev/ttyACM0

I have a strange problem and I know I am doing things way outside of the box. First of all I don't like Gnome or really any of the mess-windows flavored desktop systems and no, I don't like the MacOSX flavored desktop systems (like Ubuntu's Unity) either. The 'desktop' system (if you could have called it that) that I learned on was DEC's 'DecWindows' system on

I did a yum update on my CentOS 6 laptop and it upgraded Firefox to 78, and FF stopped seeing my mic and speakers. Is there some magic I need to do? As a short term (?) fix, I downgraded back to Firefox 68. My system is otherwise up-to-date. -- Robert Heller -- Cell: 413-658-7953 GV: 978-633-5364 Deepwoods Software -- Custom Software Services http://www.deepsoft.com/ --

Does there exist a version of Lilo built for x86_64 CentOS 5? It does not seem to be on the DVD. *I* really, really, prefer Lilo over Grub. -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software -- Download the Model Railroad System http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows heller at deepsoft.com -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/

I am wondering about updating the version of Spam Assassin on my CentOS 5 mail server. The current version, 3.3.1-4.el5 (stock RHEL version), has been 'leaking' recently. I suspect I need some newer match rules to detect some of the newer flavors of spam. I see that in rpmforge's extras repo is version 3.3.2-4.el5.rfx -- is this version worth installing? Are there even newer versions

I am trying to get amanda backup going on a CentOS 7 system and things are not working: sharky4.deepsoft.com% sudo systemctl start amanda-udp [sudo] password for heller: Job for amanda-udp.service failed because a configured resource limit was exceeded. See "systemctl status amanda-udp.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details. sharky4.deepsoft.com% sudo systemctl status -l

Is there some reason the ahci kernel module is *missing* from the 2.6.9-89.0.16.plus.c4 kernel? It is in the standard 2.6.9-89.0.16.EL kernel. Is this due to an oversight or is there some sort of conflict? I wanted to add IEEE1394 support to my system running CentOS 4.8. I *looks* like what I need to do is download the kernel SRPM and patch the config to include the IEEE1394 modules and

OK, I wanted to replace the 500G disks in a Dell T20 server with new 2TB disks. The machine has 4 SATA ports, one used for the optical disk and three for the hard drives. It is set up with /dev/sda and /dev/sdb with each three partitions: 1 -- VFAT (for EFI) 2 -- ext4 (for /boot) 3 -- LVM /dev/sda2 and /dev/sdb2 are a mirror raid (/dev/md0) /dev/sda3 and /dev/sdb3 are a mirror raid