similar to: mirror.centos.org ships non-updated version of bind ?

On 6/11/19 12:45 AM, cosml at rsguhr.eu wrote: > Okay, some minutes before I post this question - the update was pushed to mirror.centos.org and an announcement was published: > https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2019-June/023321.html > > But the actually question still remains: > Which steps are between 'RedHat published an update' and

Okay, some minutes before I post this question - the update was pushed to mirror.centos.org and an announcement was published: https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2019-June/023321.html But the actually question still remains: Which steps are between 'RedHat published an update' and 'mirror.centos.org'? At Fedora there's 'Bodhi' where Users can

On 6/11/19 2:20 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 6/11/19 12:45 AM, cosml at rsguhr.eu wrote: >> Okay, some minutes before I post this question - the update was pushed to mirror.centos.org and an announcement was published: >> https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2019-June/023321.html >> >> But the actually question still remains: >> Which steps are

On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 01:19, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Saturday, 11 July 2020 11.32.32 WEST Jos? Ab?lio Matos wrote: > > If I do not hear until then I will push the update Monday night (Western > > Europe time zone. > > Well I tried but I did not succeeded both using the web interface and cli > interfaces: > >

Apologies if this email is a top post. I'm not sure how to reply to a thread if I'm not subscribed. We recently encountered the same issue that Evan reported on 6/4 and I can confirm that updated to 3.3.0-5 does address the build failure. Will 3.3.0-5 make it into EPEL? If so, do you have any idea when? The current package is breaking our build process and I'm wondering if it's

Hi all, I'm looking for a fix in postgis, which seems to be fixed already in postgis-2.0.7-2.el7. However that package seems to be 'stuck' in the epel7-testing repository: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=750618 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-b6c229157e Is there a reason that the package is not pushed to stable yet? Or can it be

Over the last several days, I've been working hard to get all of the Fedora R packages rebuilt against R 4.0 in rawhide (in the F33-R-4 side tag). With the exception of R-biomaRt, R-BSgenome, R-GenomicAlignments, and R-rtracklayer, I believe everything is built and updated to the latest versions. And of those packages, they're all ready to go when Fedora infrastructure is working reliably

I know, I know, you've heard this song before... ;) EL5: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-09c8007e64 EL6: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-0a9e4df655 Please go download -8 and test it. It looks good on my end. If it works for you (with CRAN modules), please give positive karma so it will land in updates-stable faster than two weeks. Thanks

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote: > On 06/06/2016 05:04 PM, Brian Fallik wrote: > > Apologies if this email is a top post. I'm not sure how to reply to a > > thread if I'm not subscribed. > > > > We recently encountered the same issue that Evan reported on 6/4 and I > can > > confirm that updated to

On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 15:58, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 7 July 2020 11.44.48 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > Try with the CLI (see "man bodhi"): > > > > $ bodhi updates edit <update> --addbuilds <builds> > > I found that the best call in this case is instead of --addbuilds to use > --from-tag since then

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

R-BiocFileCache is now branched for f32 (finally). You should be able to build it if/when the PDC comes back up. Lotta random outages right now. Tom On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:40 AM Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 03.40.52 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > > Over the last several days, I've been working hard to get all of the > Fedora >

R 2.12.0 is built now for Fedora and EPEL. It is in "updates-testing" (or it will be within the next 24 hours). I did not do this build for Fedora 12, as that release will be End-Of-Life in a month. In accordance with the new policies on Fedora Updates, these new packages will not be pushed as official updates until they either receive positive testing from users, or sit in

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:0230 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0230 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 491b63a51365bb112538c3cc527cc9a0f9cbb8599989268b2367a88b6923e39d polkit-0.112-18.el7_6.1.i686.rpm

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:1294 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1294 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: d3bc15f46b959b2f93e4ecc14f0a2e567475305f0674910b947cb841ad29a836 bind-9.9.4-74.el7_6.1.x86_64.rpm

On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 12:38, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Monday, 6 July 2020 21.08.53 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > > R-BiocFileCache is now branched for f32 (finally). You should be able to > > build it if/when the PDC comes back up. Lotta random outages right now. > > > > Tom > > I have re/built them using the side tag but I do not

Is the logging system thread-safe? I have a process that takes about 5 hours, and twice, it has stopped, giving me no errors at all... but the process hasnt been finished... The second time, I loaded the status page, and it gave me a 500 error, at the same time the process stopped. I have a sneaking suspicion that the cause is two processes trying to write to the log-file at the same

Hi I need some advice what to do next, even if someone tells me to check out (an)other mailing list(s), tuning site or point me in a better direction how to solve my annoying problem: one server is much faster for certain tasks although on "shitty" hardware. I have tried many things to solve my issue - changed buffer/pool/cache/etc mysqld - changed server settings apache/php -

I''ve just had a problem with fastcgi killing processes off while they were running (I have a long-running background process)... but it took me a while to track it down and pinpoint that fastcgi was asking the process to quit. So i was thinking if it would be a good idea to tweak the way ruby-fastcgi handles this. At the moment, in fcgi.rb (part of the fcgi gem) there is