similar to: root .bash_profile?

Emacs Org-mode ? https://orgmode.org/ ?On 4/14/19, 1:51 PM, "CentOS on behalf of Frank Cox" <centos-bounces at centos.org on behalf of theatre at sasktel.net> wrote: On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 12:42:56 +0200 H wrote: > I would love to find an old-fashioned outliner, like the ones that used to > exist prior to the modern GUIs. It would make writing structured

On 04/15/2019 02:18 PM, Peda, Allan (NYC-GIS) wrote: > Emacs Org-mode ? https://orgmode.org/ > > ?On 4/14/19, 1:51 PM, "CentOS on behalf of Frank Cox" <centos-bounces at centos.org on behalf of theatre at sasktel.net> wrote: > > On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 12:42:56 +0200 > H wrote: > > > I would love to find an old-fashioned outliner, like the

I'd isolate all that RAID stuff from your OS, so the root, /boot, /usr, /etc /tmp, /bin swap are on "normal" partition(s). I know I'm missing some directories, but the point is you should be able to unmount that RAID stuff to adjust it without crippling your system. https://www.howtogeek.com/117435/htg-explains-the-linux-directory-structure-explained/ ?On 6/27/19, 9:37 AM,

On Thu, 27 Jun 2019, Peda, Allan (NYC-GIS) wrote: > I'd isolate all that RAID stuff from your OS, so the root, /boot, /usr, /etc /tmp, /bin swap are on "normal" partition(s). I know I'm missing some directories, but the point is you should be able to unmount that RAID stuff to adjust it without crippling your system. > >

I would love to find an old-fashioned outliner, like the ones that used to exist prior to the modern GUIs. It would make writing structured documents, or organizing thoughts in general, so much more convenient, productive and faster. Ideally it should allow saving files in txt, OO and markdown formats... Does anything like this exist that can run in a terminal window under Centos??

I think the subject says it all. We don't run named. It seems there are chronic issues with bind. Can these packages be removed? We locally authenticate. I see this: Removing for dependencies: bind-utils ipa-client sssd sssd-ad sssd-ipa We shouldn't need any of that with local authentication (/etc passwd and /etc/shadow) right? This message contains information which may be

Hello list. The next days we are going to install Centos 7 on a new server, with 4*3Tb sata hdd as raid-5. We will use the graphical interface to install and set up raid. Do I have to consider anything before installation, because the disks are very large? Does the graphical use the parted to set/format the raid? I hope the above make sense. Thank you in advance. Nikos

Hi, The $home of root is /root, just copy it there. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bee.Lists" <bee.lists at gmail.com> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > Sent: Monday, 13 May, 2019 13:28:24 > Subject: [CentOS] root .bash_profile? > Hi folks. Just

Ah thank you. Having forgotten this, I already had all my aliases and instructions in there. For some reason they aren?t loading. If I do this, then everything loads: source /root/.bash_profile So there?s an indication this isn?t loading upon entry into su. Is this normal? > On May 13, 2019, at 8:38 AM, Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote: > > Hi, > > The $home of root

On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 08:28 -0400, Bee.Lists wrote: > Hi folks. Just wondering how I can implement an automatic .bash_profile for root. I have to load my > user .bash_profile every time I get into root, and I would like a better solution. There is no /home/ > for root, so I?m a bit confused if this is even allowed. > > Any insight appreciated. > > > Cheers, Bee >

On Mon, 13 May 2019 at 08:28, Bee.Lists <bee.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks. Just wondering how I can implement an automatic .bash_profile > for root. I have to load my user .bash_profile every time I get into root, > and I would like a better solution. There is no /home/ for root, so I?m a > bit confused if this is even allowed. > > Most Linux distributions

No, this isn?t a case of multi partitions, clusters, or anything silly. I just want a set of aliases loaded for su. /root/.bash_profile isn?t loading, and there isn?t any obvious choice as to where the loaded .bash* were loading from. > On May 13, 2019, at 9:11 AM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote: > > While moving /root to /home/root is done in someplaces, it

On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 13:06 -0400, Bee.Lists wrote: > Ah thank you. Having forgotten this, I already had all my aliases > and instructions in there. For some reason they aren?t loading. If > I do this, then everything loads: > > source /root/.bash_profile > > So there?s an indication this isn?t loading upon entry into su. Is > this normal? $ man bash, search on

Once upon a time, Bee.Lists <bee.lists at gmail.com> said: > No, this isn?t a case of multi partitions, clusters, or anything silly. I just want a set of aliases loaded for su. /root/.bash_profile isn?t loading, and there isn?t any obvious choice as to where the loaded .bash* were loading from. .bash_profile will not be read when you just run "su", because .bash_profile is

> ~/.bash_profile > The personal initialization file, executed for login shells > > First, the ~ which might not apply to root. Why do you think that? '~' is just shell shorthand for user's home directory. > Second, it?s a ?personal? init file, which also might not pertain to > root. root is just as much a user as anyone else, albeit one with

On 13/05/2019 22:25, Pete Biggs wrote: > On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 16:20 -0400, Bee.Lists wrote: <snip> > > It may not be "just another user", but it *is* a user as much as your > login username is a user. You could assign your own username a UID of > 0, and it would have the same privileges as 'root', but it would still > act as your username. NOTE: doing

On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 04:20:17PM -0400, Bee.Lists wrote: > > On May 13, 2019, at 2:46 PM, Pete Biggs <pete at biggs.org.uk> wrote: > > Why do you think that? '~' is just shell shorthand for user's home > > directory. > > root quite often isn?t recognized as a proper user. ~/.bash_profile > isn?t loaded because it?s not a normal login shell when

su does not load .bash_profile and therefore is a completely different application than with any other user. This one is different, considering .bash_profile is indeed used for logins for other users. > On May 13, 2019, at 5:25 PM, Pete Biggs <pete at biggs.org.uk> wrote: > >> >> man su doesn?t apply to root with regards to the files loaded up upon >> login.

On Tue, 14 May 2019, Bee.Lists wrote: > su does not load .bash_profile and therefore is a completely different application than with any other user. This one is different, considering .bash_profile is indeed used for logins for other users. You misunderstand. su behaves the same when switching to root as to any other account. su - is probably the command you're looking for. jh

On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 05:19:57AM -0400, Bee.Lists wrote: > OK I think you need to read previous posts on this. > > I?m not looking for any other command. Please stop top-posting, thank you. It's the _same command_; all it is is a different invocation method using an additional argument. John -- We're not ending the journey today, we're completing a chapter