similar to: JavaFX on C7 ?

> -----Original Message----- > From: Phil Wyett <philwyett at kathenas.org> > Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2019 10:16 PM > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] JavaFX on C7 ? > > On Sun, 2019-05-12 at 21:52 -0400, Fred Smith wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > I'm getting: > > > > Error: JavaFX runtime components are missing, and are

On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 02:11:42PM +0000, Denniston, Todd A CIV USN NSWC CD CRANE ID (USA) wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2019-05-12 at 21:52 -0400, Fred Smith wrote: > > > Hi all! > > > > > > I'm getting: > > > > > > Error: JavaFX runtime components are missing, and are required to run > > > this application > > > >

On Sun, 2019-05-12 at 21:52 -0400, Fred Smith wrote: > Hi all! > > I'm getting: > > Error: JavaFX runtime components are missing, and are required to run > this application > > for a certain Java app. > > I'm hoping someone can tell me what bits and pieces I need to install > (and maybe where to find them) so I can satisfy that app's appetite >

Today, Adobe Systems Incorporated announced[1] that they will extend their Flash platform to support the proprietary H.264 and HE-AAC formats. The Xiph.Org Foundation has previously contacted Adobe to consider extending Flash to support the Open Media formats Vorbis, Theora, and Speex. Adobe developers replied by stating it would be unwise as it would increase the file size of the Flash Player,

Today, Adobe Systems Incorporated announced[1] that they will extend their Flash platform to support the proprietary H.264 and HE-AAC formats. The Xiph.Org Foundation has previously contacted Adobe to consider extending Flash to support the Open Media formats Vorbis, Theora, and Speex. Adobe developers replied by stating it would be unwise as it would increase the file size of the Flash Player,

I've got a CentOS 5 server that I want to migrate over into a virtualized instance. The problem is I need to minimize downtime so was trying to figure out a way to "live" clone the original. Initially, I thought I could do this via exporting an iSCSI target from the virtual host, create a MD raid 1 array on the C5 server, wait for it to sync, then shutdown the physical server and

At Sun, 28 Apr 2019 18:53:21 +0100 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sun, 2019-04-28 at 12:11 -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > > I am having this problem on Ubuntu 18.04 -- I manage a batch of desktop > > machines with some convience desktop launchers, which gnome3 insists are > >

Thanks! I can try to modify that for my needs. Any idea where can I find a list of patches? I'll look for centos specific ones that I might want to apply. The spec file you shared has a few upstream patches as well as Fedora specific ones. I wonder does one knows which patches should be applied to each release, do they publish it somewhere? Roee. ?On 1/23/19, 6:35 PM, "CentOS on behalf

I am having this problem on Ubuntu 18.04 -- I manage a batch of desktop machines with some convience desktop launchers, which gnome3 insists are "untrusted". With some general websearching reveals that this is a *GNome3* so-called "security" issue (https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/commit/1630f5348). I found a thread on the CentOS Forums (I don't have an account

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Alan Bartlett <ajb at elrepo.org> wrote: > On 13 May 2018 at 14:56, Phil Wyett <philwyett at kathenas.org> wrote: >> I have ideas of contribution areas, but they will be brought up for discussion >> at a later time. More urgent issues like Todo on the wiki, may a good place to >> begin discussion and update as it has not been

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, With now release 5 and below all EOL for over 12 months[1]. What guidelines/policy is in place for removal of old and out of date content from the wiki? [1] 5 is in extended support upstream and documentation etc. remain available until November 30, 2020. Should 5 related content remain until that date? Regards Phil - -- *** If this is a

hi guys I've one box where I just yesterday upgraded Centos. I wonder if that kernel upgrade process might somewhat troublesome. After that upgrade UEFI boot fails with: Failed to set MokListRT: Invalid Parameter Something has gone seriously wrong: import_mok_state() failed : Invalid Parameter Has anybody seen that? And maybe know to fix it? many thanks, L.

Hello there, I'm encountering blocking issues with VMWare Workstation v14/v12 on CentOS 7. The issue is that any Linux guestsystem will get network-disconnected after a short while. I tried w/ brand new guest installs, guests coming from a v12 WS. Tried different guest network settings, I always get disconnected. I found several cases like this on the Web, but couldn't see any working

On Sat, 2018-05-12 at 12:17 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > Everyone, > > With the update to Centos 7.5 it is apparent that we lost the Courier > 10 Pitch fonts that were in "xorg-x11-fonts-Type1".??Does anyone know > how to get this back. > > Greg Ennis > > Hi, Type 1 font support was dropped for 5.3. See below article.

Hi, Any chance someone (Johnny?) could point me towards the latest centos-release src rpm? Regards, -- Tom me at tdiehl.org

Hi, I have to rebuild a handful of CentOS packages for some extra functionality. So I setup a build environment in a virtual machine, and right now I'm trying to find the SRPMS. I enabled the repositories listed in /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Sources.repo and then tried this: [microlinux at buildbox:~] $ yumdownloader --source ark Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks, priorities Enabling

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 13:42 +0000, Phil Wyett wrote: > On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 13:32 +0000, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > > hi guys > > > > I've one box where I just yesterday upgraded Centos. I > > wonder if that kernel upgrade process might somewhat > > troublesome. > > After that upgrade UEFI boot fails

Where do I get an update for gpg2 (GnuPG) for CentOS 6.10 that is compliant with CVE-2018-12020? I'm trying to update gpg2 (GnuPG GNU Privacy Guard) on my fully updated CentOS 6.10 computer to comply with CVE-2018-12020. My system has gpg2 package? gnupg2-2.0.14-8.el6.x86_64.rpm This package does not appear to be compliant with CVE-2018-12020.? I can not find and update anywhere. I have tried

> Hi all, Hello Phil > > Trying to lookup QA related team, data and general info. > > Issues: > > * Not allowed to view below page, even if logged in. > > https://wiki.centos.org/QaTeam The page contains pieces of information which is preferable to not be available for reading to the general public, > * Page below mentions QA mailing list. > >

Am 13.05.2018 um 18:00 schrieb Gregory P. Ennis <PoMec at PoMec.Net>: > > I have started the process of trying to replace our templates with a > new font. 'Liberation mono' is a close match, but for some reason I > don't like the way it looks when the whole page of type is scanned all > together. Try to convert the type1 fonts into a truetype container (using