similar to: Intel Vroc experiences?

On 6/28/2015 11:11 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote: > May I ask why you don't just use a made-for-the-purpose-distro like > Smoothwall to do this? indeed, I use pfSense, running on a APU1D4 [1] router board as my firewall, and a separate home server on a HP Microserver [2]. IMHO, keeping the firewall function completely separate simplifies security. that router board can handle 300 Mbit/sec of

Is my new 300GB RAID 1 array REALLY going to take 18936 minutes to sync!!???

Dear all, I'm not used to handling software raid. I've inherited a server which has raid 10 set. one of our disks failed, and it's to be replaced today. My question is; any hint how to add this new disk to the existing raid array ? first thought is :- Create identical partitions as other disks in the array i'd like to add it to.- add it to raid. Though i'm extremely worried of

I have configured 2x 500G sata HDD as Software RAID1 with three partitions md0,md1 and md2 with md2 as 400+ gigs Now it is almost 36 hours the status is cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] md0 : active raid1 hdb1[1] hda1[0] 104320 blocks [2/2] [UU] resync=DELAYED md1 : active raid1 hdb2[1] hda2[0] 4096448 blocks [2/2] [UU] resync=DELAYED md2 : active raid1

Hi Phil, Not sure if you've had time to look at this? As mentioned middleware, like docker-ce, is preventing us from moving to el8. Thanks Dan On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 10:33 PM Dedoep <stompnoe at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Phil, ok that's great thanks. > I have a colleague working through vroc/fake raid issues we're having > when using

I have a 750Gb 3-member software raid1 where 2 partitions are always present and the third is regularly rotated and re-synced (SATA disks in hot-swap bays). The timing of the resync seems to be extremely variable recently, taking anywhere from 3 to 10 hours even if the partition is unmounted and the drives aren't doing anything else and regardless of what I echo into

On 9/15/20 8:09 AM, Phil Perry wrote: > On 15/09/2020 05:28, Dedoep wrote: >> Hi Phil, >> >> Not sure if you've had time to look at this? As mentioned middleware, >> like >> docker-ce, is preventing us from moving to el8. >> >> Thanks >> Dan >> > > Hi Dan, > > I've succeeded in backporting mac802154_hwsim for you as a

Greetings, I'm rebuilding a machine to function as a gateway/router to Verizon DSL. It has two NICs eth0 and eth1 (static set to 192.168.1.1). eth0 connects to the DSL modem. I've setup Verizon DSL usine pppoe-setup, and it works. I can connect from home machines to the server (192.168.1.1); while logged in to the server, I can connect to both the internet, and the home machines.

On 10/07/15 11:13, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Jack Bailey wrote: > >>> controller that expects to talk to individual SAS or SATA drives. you >>> can manage it with hpssacli from centos. >> I have the P822. It has no JBOD or RAID 0. hpacucli works with CentOS >> 7.0, but is broken on 7.1 -- it cannot find the controller. > Can it do RAID 6? > This page

On 11/09/2020 07:59, Dedoep wrote: > Hello John & Frank, > > We have tried both Centos8 and > installing kernel-ml-5.8.6-2.el7.elrepo.x86_64.rpm but both options are too > "bleeding" edge for our other middleware that still require the Centos > 7 3.10.0-1127.18.2.el7.x86_64. Hence the request. > > Thanks > I have tried backporting the module to el7 for

https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake has the current EL6 variant support for it? Any experience? Feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, LF

> Am 11.05.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: > >> Am 11.05.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: >> >> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel >> >> shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about >> >> Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake >> >> has the current EL6

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 18 February 2015 at 19:52, Jack Howarth > <howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> wrote: >> Assuming that the clang-omp >> developers can find time to rebase their upstream tree on the new 3.6 >> release, I intend to do the same for the fink llvm36 packaging. So >> yes, a

Does rails have any builtin functionality similar to that of ASP.Net''s encryptable ViewState? For those that don''t know what the ASP.Net viewstate is, it is essentially just a hidden form field with the name __VIEWSTATE, that stores a series of encoded(or encrypted) key/value pairs as it''s value. When the form is submitted the viewstate value is decoded/decrypted on the

Hello, I'm looking for a dirt cheap solution for SOHO use to handle at most a couple of POTS lines, and I notice that X10?P cards go for $15 on eBay as opposed to $90 for an OpenVox card or over $200 for a Sangoma. I have a couple of questions about those cheap FXO cards: 1. Are they all glorified softmodems, ie. none has an on-board CPU or DSP and outsources all processing to the

On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 15:18:35 +0100 Ralph Böhme <slow at samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 01:32:51PM +0000, Rowland Penny wrote: > >On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:49:42 +0100 Ralph Böhme wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:45:45PM +0100, Björn JACKE via samba > >> wrote: > >> >To reflect the fact that the owner can be a group also, winbind >

Hi Phil, ok that's great thanks. I have a colleague working through vroc/fake raid issues we're having when using kernel-ml-5.8.6-2.el7.elrepo.x86_64.rpm by switching to linux soft raid. Also we dont have a supported docker-ce for el8 yet. On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 9:10 PM Phil Perry <pperry at elrepo.org> wrote: > On 11/09/2020 07:59, Dedoep wrote: > > Hello John &

On 15/09/2020 05:28, Dedoep wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Not sure if you've had time to look at this? As mentioned middleware, like > docker-ce, is preventing us from moving to el8. > > Thanks > Dan > Hi Dan, I've succeeded in backporting mac802154_hwsim for you as a standalone kmod package for el7. I've updated your request here:

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of John R Pierce > Sent: den 29 juni 2015 08:29 > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home > server > > On 6/28/2015 11:11 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote: > > May I ask why you don't just use a

hi guys, what I would like to ask is DDR4 3200Mhz in these server - has anybody tried? many thanks, L.