similar to: How often do CentOS bugs get triaged?

I've been making my own custom RHEL / CentOS boot CDs for years, and all of the instructions for such work call out to take a distro's CD, and copy key files from it. Among those files are those that I think are associated with the the SYSLINUX/ISOLINUX project; e.g.: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/images/ http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/isolinux/ Two

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 03:18:16PM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/13/2015 01:40 PM, Brian Reichert wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:51:07PM -0400, Brian Reichert wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:42:08AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >>> The info you are looking at there is for CentOS-7 .. the syslinux for > >>> CentOS-6 is here: >

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:03:00PM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:38:06AM -0400, Brian Reichert wrote: > > Does anyone have any insight on these topics, or, at the very least, > > a better forum to pursue them? > > The patches used to build the latest syslinux package for CentOS7 are > here: > >

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:42:08AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > The info you are looking at there is for CentOS-7 .. the syslinux for > CentOS-6 is here: > > http://vault.centos.org/6.7/os/Source/SPackages/syslinux-4.04-3.el6.src.rpm > > The CentOS team did not modify that source code, we just built it as is. > > That source code produces the syslinux binary used by

First off, I have to admit that I'm uncertain if this is the appropriate forum; I'd be happy for suggestions about where else to look. I'm doing this work on a stock install of CentOS-7-x86_64-Minimal-1810.iso, with no updates. I'm trying to create an RPM database from a custom set of RPMs. One RPM ('openldap-ltb' from the LDAP Tool Box project (ltb-project.org) has a

Ok, I'm trying way too hard to shovel myself out of a hole. We have a bunch of remote CentOS 6 servers, that were configured with kickstart. They've subsequently had additional RPMs installed/updated via the 'rpm' utility. We have reason to occasionally rewind the state of the server back to it's original set of RPMs. Of late, we've found that 'yum' handles this

On 10/13/2015 01:40 PM, Brian Reichert wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:51:07PM -0400, Brian Reichert wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:42:08AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> The info you are looking at there is for CentOS-7 .. the syslinux for >>> CentOS-6 is here: >>> >>>

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:51:07PM -0400, Brian Reichert wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:42:08AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > The info you are looking at there is for CentOS-7 .. the syslinux for > > CentOS-6 is here: > > > > http://vault.centos.org/6.7/os/Source/SPackages/syslinux-4.04-3.el6.src.rpm Related question; where do these files come from?

This sounds really weird, bear with me. I've put together a custom install CD derived from CentOS-7-x86_64-Minimal-1810.iso. I've added my RPMs in the mix, and have my dependencies lined up. The installation of the RPMs fail, from packaging.log: ... 15:42:35,741 INFO packaging: libwbclient-4.8.3-4.el7.x86_64 (320/432) 15:42:35,741 INFO packaging:

Hello. I once read somewhere that it's possible to limit SSH pubkeys to 'tunnel-only'. I can't seem to find any information about this in any of the usual places. I'm going to be deploying a few servers in a couple of days and I'd like them to log to a central server over an SSH tunnel (using syslog-ng) however I'd like to prevent actual logins (hence

I'm forwarding this to security@, as I'm getting no replies on ipfw@. Hope it's relevant enough for you :( ---Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Erik Paulsen Skålerud Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 1:02 AM To: ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Question about logging. Sorry for asking this, It's probably been

I have asked this before in -questions but due to a odd security requirement, I need the option to auto lock a normal user's account (root and those in the wheel group must be excluded) after let say, 3, login failures. I know this can cause a DoS issue but I HAVE to have the option of doing it in FreeBSD. Any info is appreciated Thanks. Mike C carlson39@llnl.gov

Dear Mr Anvin, we use SYSLINUX for our industrial embedded devices and it works very good. You can see them at www.control.de (EDSP and TRZB) if you want. Questions 1: I didnt find out how to put the DOS mbr, delivered with SYSLINUX, to my bootdevice. What is the right command? Question 2: When I want to use PXELINUX with a BIOS that does not support Network boot via PXE is it possible to

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23495 Summary: nouveau KMS produces no output on a Dell 3008WFP monitor Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at

I am running the stock OpenLDAP-servers on a CentOS 6 system. Everything is working just fine, but I am trying to debug connections from a Ubuntu (18.04) system and want to turn on logging in slapd, but although I can get slapd to create a log file, it never actually writes anything. I have these two lines in /etc/openldap/slapd.d/cn=config.ldif: olcLogFile: /var/log/slapd/log olcLogLevel:

These source addresses are likely spoofed, but am still curious whether other FreeBSD admins saw a preponderance of DNS probes originating from Microsoft corp subnets ahead of the recent ISC bind vulnerability announcement? Roger Marquis Jul 28 16:51:23 PDT named[...]: client 94.245.67.253#10546: query (cache) 'output.txt/A/IN' denied Jul 28 16:51:23 PDT named[...]: client

Hi, I am looking for an offline accounting package recommendation, please. I enjoyed using Xero accounting, but need something that's offline, and where the data remains my property. Having used Quickbooks on Windows in the past, I am looking for something similar. Any recommendations? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers Website: http://www.rudiahlers.co.za

HI all, When CentOS 7 was created things like SSLv2 TLSv1 TLSv1.1 etc... were all OK, but now they have fallen out of favor for various reasons. Updating to CentOS 7.7 does not automatically disable these types of items from apache - is there a script that is available that can be ran to bring a box up to current "accepted" levels ? Or is that an edit by hand, do it yourself on all your

There may be ways to force NIC naming, I've done so but only on Ubuntu so you'll need to do the research if it's important to you. Things to look for based on my experience: 70-persistent-net.rules, net.ifnames=0, biosdevname=0. ________________________________ From: CentOS <centos-bounces at centos.org> on behalf of Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> Sent: Sunday,

Hi, Sometimes, I found one of my Mellanox NIC renamed to rename6, instead of eth1. The right names of NICs in my system should be: eth0 Mellanox NIC eth1 Mellanox NIC eth2 Intel NIC eth3 Intel NIC eth4 Intel NIC eth5 Intel NIC eth0 and eth1 will combined as bond1 with mode 4. However, the current names are: eth0 Mellanox