similar to: how to install Xorg X11 libXss runtime library

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:02 AM qw <applemax82 at 163.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > I try to install vtune on centos7, which shows the following message: > > > Xorg X11 libXss runtime library is not found. 'Graphical user interface' > component of VTune Amplifier cannot be installed. > The install program cannot detect the Xorg X11 libXss runtime library >

I am in need of libXss for centos 8 -yum install did not find it. Thoughts? Jerry

Actually, MCJIT doesn't perform relocations on debug sections. I'm not sure that would matter anyway. The place where I'm handling the debug information is outside MCJIT and the MCJIT relocation code isn't really accessible at that point. Right now, when MCJIT emits an object image, it broadcasts an event to any registered listeners indicating that an object was emitted, passing

Full_Name: R User Version: 2.7.2 (default binary) OS: Windows XP SP2 Submission from: (NULL) (83.25.29.163) Hello! I have conducted following experiment running simple R script: for (i in 1:10000) { a<-0 for (j in 1:1000) a<-c(a,j) } profiled R.dll using Intel Vtune and obtained following results!!! Func. Name Clocticks locale2charset 46,58%

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Kaylor, Andrew <andrew.kaylor at intel.com>wrote: > Actually, MCJIT doesn’t perform relocations on debug sections. I’m not > sure that would matter anyway. The place where I’m handling the debug > information is outside MCJIT and the MCJIT relocation code isn’t really > accessible at that point.**** > > ** > I know it doesn't,

I believe the perf tool cannot profile/analyze the JITed code in MCJIT model. Can you please confirm this ? I was working on a patch to fix this. Another question, is the there any support to map the llvm IR with x86 generated assembly ? so its easier to analyze the code generator. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, After having used S+ in commercial setting and then R in non-commerical (but still supporting my commercial interests), I would like to give back, if possible. Where I can contribute: 1. SCAN / PREVENT Stability and Threat analysis (big open source presence supported by coverity) 2. Intel Threaded Building Blocks library support to leverage multicore CPUs (plan now for 8-way) 3. VTune

On 2/24/13 10:07 AM, Lu Mitnick wrote: > Hello all, > > I have developed a instrumented pass which insert some variables > between the original variables, > as well as insert some code into the original source code. just like: > > ============= original source code ============= > > int a[10]; > > void fun1 () { > // some source code here > } > >

Unfortunately, I've ran into a second issue where addpd is being performed on memory that isn't 16 byte aligned. Again, this only happens if the createJIT OptLevel is set to Default (vs None). According to

Hi, Keir, Currently, HVM guests do not have access to performance counters. So it is not possible to use performance analyzer software such as vtune in HVM guest to analyze programme performance. Other usage of performance counters , for example, the NMI watchdog, won''t function either. This patch will enable performance counters in HVM guest. Currently, only Core 2 Duo is implemented.

Hi Priyendra, There is support for oprofile and Intel(r) VTune(tm) Performance Analyzer, but either one needs to be explicitly turned on during the build process. If you use MCJIT (as opposed to the older JIT) then oprofile support isn't in place yet. Both of these work by providing a JITEventListener that receives notification when new code is emitted and hooks it up to the profiling tool

Thanks for the info. I am using old JIT. So that should not be a problem. I will take a look at using oprofile. I have never used it - so will be somewhat of a learning curve. I notice that the configure script has a --with-oprofile option. In addition to enabling that, is there something else that also needs to be done? My copy of LLVM is compiled with --enable-optimized. Will --with-oprofile

> On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 10:26 -0500, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS > wrote: >> On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 19:25 -0500, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS >> wrote: >> > I'm about ready to run "dnf erase *mate*" and try re-installing >> > MATE >> > from scratch from the GNOME3 desktop. Is that possible without >> > ripping >>

MAL wrote: > > I don't know how to profile code (yet), but i'm about to go find out. > > Is it possible to profile the code on my x86 workstation, or does it > absolutely have to be run on the machine? ARM emulator anyone? :) <p>Intel designed performance monitoring hardware into the XScale. They also have a profiling tool called VTune that consists of some

Hi, For software development, projects are built through makefile. After building, I can run binary program. rpm is more convenient. Is there some tool that can build rpm? Thanks! Regards Andrew

Hi, My question is : what multimedia framework does Centos use for server purpose? Thanks! B.R. Andrew

Hi, Does centos 7.6 support TL-WN725N, which is a wireless adaptor? Thanks! Regards Andrew

Hi, windows 7 supports smb3. If centos's samba server suport smb3, how to make windows 10 support smb3 too? Thanks! Regards Andrew At 2019-09-13 15:47:34, "John Hodrien" <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk> wrote: >On Thu, 12 Sep 2019, me at tdiehl.org wrote: > >> Why? This is NOT necessary for win 10 to work. I do not even know if it will >> work with

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > At this point, if you want to help, the best way would probably to try > tracking done what part of the code is responsible for the high system. > Once this is identified, we'll have a much better idea. > > I managed to log on the XSCALE 400 on handhelds.org. It helped, but I > can't do everything with it (and by attempts at profiling failed). I

That relocation handling is only done for the llvm-dwarfdump binary. MCJIT handles relocations a bit different. I think you just need to go ahead and allow the MCJIT relocation handling machinery to work on non-alloc sections and it should go ahead and handle these just fine, unless you're using the existing stuff in lib/DebugInfo to print out information or something? If this isn't what