similar to: In place upgrade of RHEL 8 Beta to CentOS 8?

On Tuesday, April 9, 2019 7:40:01 AM PDT Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 4/8/19 3:20 PM, Benjamin Smith wrote: > > I'm about to rebuild a server, currently running CentOS 6. If I have to do > > an OS reinstall, my intention is to upgrade, as it's the oldest OS server > > under my purview. As this server is pretty low visibility, I'd like to > > see if I can start

On 4/8/19 3:20 PM, Benjamin Smith wrote: > I'm about to rebuild a server, currently running CentOS 6. If I have to do an > OS reinstall, my intention is to upgrade, as it's the oldest OS server under > my purview. As this server is pretty low visibility, I'd like to see if I can > start using EL 8 instead of 7.x. > > In the past, I was able to switch between

Benjamin Smith wrote: > On Tuesday, April 9, 2019 7:40:01 AM PDT Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 4/8/19 3:20 PM, Benjamin Smith wrote: >> >>> I'm about to rebuild a server, currently running CentOS 6. If I have >>> to do an OS reinstall, my intention is to upgrade, as it's the oldest >>> OS server >>> under my purview. As this server is

Am 10.04.2019 um 19:00 schrieb mark <m.roth at 5-cent.us>: > > Benjamin Smith wrote: >> On Tuesday, April 9, 2019 7:40:01 AM PDT Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >>> On 4/8/19 3:20 PM, Benjamin Smith wrote: >>> >>>> I'm about to rebuild a server, currently running CentOS 6. If I have >>>> to do an OS reinstall, my intention is to

For those who don't follow the QA RSS, see: http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/node/120 to get the latest info on the status of 6.2. Looks good so far!

Hi All, I am aware that rsync can be run to just list the files that have changed between the source and destination. I would like to capitalize on that feature to monitor some development that is going on in order to get a complete list of files that have been changed on a server. I realize that I can create an initial rsync of the files to some other location and then sometime later run

On May 20, 2008, at 8:57 AM, David Greene wrote: > On Tuesday 20 May 2008 07:03, Nicolas Capens wrote: > >> 1) Does ScalarReplAggregates totally superscede >> PromoteMemoryToRegister? I > > Nope, they are different. Mem2Reg is really important if you want > register > allocation. Actually SROA does fully subsume Mem2Reg. It iterates between breaking up

I have 4 kernels in /boot, leaving on 20MB which is not enough for the next one. I had installonly_limit= set at 5, as there were some kernel problems.? After I got the error that there was not enough room for another kernel, I set installonly_limit= to 3 and did the update with --exclude=kernel* That worked to update everything else, but not remove the oldest kernel. How can I remove the

There's an upper limit to how many IMAP/POP3 connections can exist that haven't logged in (and separate limits for post-login). Normally when this limit is reached, the oldest connection gets disconnected. There is of course some potential to try to DoS Dovecot by doing a lot of IMAP/POP3 connections, but because the oldest connection always gets destroyed this requires quite a lot of

There's an upper limit to how many IMAP/POP3 connections can exist that haven't logged in (and separate limits for post-login). Normally when this limit is reached, the oldest connection gets disconnected. There is of course some potential to try to DoS Dovecot by doing a lot of IMAP/POP3 connections, but because the oldest connection always gets destroyed this requires quite a lot of

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > That?s only true if the majority of people will in fact override the default policy. The current behavior in Fedora and CentOS lets you click Done twice and bypass the weak password complaint. > But as I have repeatedly pointed out here, the stock rules really are not that onerous. They basically encode

Dear Mr Petr Pikal I am extremely sorry for the manner I have raised the query. Actually that was my first post to this R forum and in fact even I was also bit confused while drafting the query, for which I really owe sorry to all for consuming the precious time. Perhaps I will try to redraft my query in a better way as follows. I have two datasets "A" and "B" containing the

On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 13:48, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > > On 2019-05-08 12:28, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 13:24, mark <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > > >> > > Yep. Minimum for that is going to be about the same as your RESCUE. The > > other would just be to confirm that the sda has space and

Sorry, but i wasn't sure the best place to post this. I was looking for some forums but it doesn't look like Xiph has any official ones. Anyways, i heard about this MT9 think a while ago and i thought it would be awesome if FLAC, Vorbis, and all could implement something like this. http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2008/may/27/news.seanmichaels http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MT9 In

Sorry, but i wasn't sure the best place to post this. I was looking for some forums but it doesn't look like Xiph has any official ones. Anyways, i heard about this MT9 think a while ago and i thought it would be awesome if FLAC, Vorbis, and all could implement something like this. http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2008/may/27/news.seanmichaels http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MT9 In

Sorry, but i wasn't sure the best place to post this. I was looking for some forums but it doesn't look like Xiph has any official ones. Anyways, i heard about this MT9 think a while ago and i thought it would be awesome if FLAC, Vorbis, and all could implement something like this. http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2008/may/27/news.seanmichaels http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MT9 In

Sorry, but i wasn't sure the best place to post this. I was looking for some forums but it doesn't look like Xiph has any official ones. Anyways, i heard about this MT9 think a while ago and i thought it would be awesome if FLAC, Vorbis, and all could implement something like this. http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2008/may/27/news.seanmichaels http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MT9 In

Sorry, but i wasn't sure the best place to post this. I was looking for some forums but it doesn't look like Xiph has any official ones. Anyways, i heard about this MT9 think a while ago and i thought it would be awesome if FLAC, Vorbis, and all could implement something like this. http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2008/may/27/news.seanmichaels http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MT9 In

Anybody thought abt an adapter for this? Obviously not in the purview of ActiveRecord but could have a similar interface.. i.e. CRUD + find [xpath] - Ruby binding does exist. Just curious. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On May 20, 2008, at 8:57 AM, David Greene wrote: > >> On Tuesday 20 May 2008 07:03, Nicolas Capens wrote: >> >>> 1) Does ScalarReplAggregates totally superscede >>> PromoteMemoryToRegister? I >> >> Nope, they are different. Mem2Reg is really important if you