similar to: nobody:nobody

On 4/3/19 5:29 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 4/3/19 2:17 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: >> >> Content of idmapd.conf: > > > As long as idmapd is *running* it typically doesn't need to be > configured specifically. > > >> Now one more question.? The imap daemon is a mail server.? How is it >> that I need a mail server running to make LDAP and NFS

Hey Y'all, For the last week or more I've been trying to get NFS and OpenLDAP to play nice with each other. I've pretty much worn the Google machine out trying to find a solution. I've found several that said "Solved" but none of those solutions solved my nobody:nobody problem. In the past I've used NFS in conjunction with NIS to share home directories from my

Hi, We are running a cluster under CentOS 6.6. We recently attached a new NAS device, running CentOS 6.8 and rsync'd our user file system to it. We noticed that all the files were owned by nobody (with nobody as the group). We copied over the /etc/passwd and /etc/group files from our front-end server to our NAS server. If we log in to the NAS server we see the files owned by their

I am trying to setup my Linux box to replace WIN-NT PDC and also i want to configure this Linux box to use LDAP authentication I am using Mandrake 9.1 installed all the following RPMS required for LDAP & SAMBA libldap2-2.0.27-4mdk libldap2-devel-2.0.27-5.3mdk.i586.rpm libldap2-devel-static-2.0.27-5.3mdk.i586.rpm libltdl3-1.4.3-1mdk.i586.rpm libunixODBC2-2.2.4-1mdk.i586.rpm

On 4/3/19 2:17 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: > > Content of idmapd.conf: As long as idmapd is *running* it typically doesn't need to be configured specifically. > Now one more question.? The imap daemon is a mail server.? How is it > that I need a mail server running to make LDAP and NFS work?? Doesn't > seem to make sense to me. idmapd is not imapd.? idmapd (aka

I am trying to find out why my group names are showing as nobody. I have a CentOS 6 system that is acting as a NFS server. I have some older fedora clients where the group name shows up fine, but newer CentOS 6 clients have the group name for NFS mounts show up as "nobody". The username shows up fine but the group name shows up as "nobody". I have tried changing some setting

I have 2 centos boxes and I want to NFS mount a dir from one to the other. When I do that the files on the client all are owned by nobody.nobody. I verified that the user and group of the files on the server exist on both hosts and have the same uid and gid. I googled and found this: http://whacked.net/2006/07/26/nfsv4nfs-mapid-nobody-domain/ domainname on both machines returns (none). I edited

Is idmapd supposed to work where users have different uid numbers on the nfsv4 server and client? It seems to show the right names for ownership on the client side, but if I automount a home directory, that user doesn't have permission to enter it, and if I change permission to allow access and create a new file, it shows on the server as owned by the uid number for the user on the client

Hai Batiste, Ok, thanks for these, i'll test that also. And the "why" is a bit more explained here. http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/crossrealm/libnfsidmap_config.html and per example, http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/crossrealm/ldap_server_setup.html First my work here, but this is a good one which i also need to adjust in my scripts, so thank you for asking

Hi, I'm trying to set up NFSv4 on two boxes (centos 5.5) and have it authenticate against our Windows 2008R2 AD server acting as the KDC. (samba/winbind is running ok with "idmap config MYCOMPANY: backend = rid" so we have identical ids across the servers.) I can mount my test directory fine via NFSv4 *without* the sec=krb5 option. However, once I put the sec=krb5 option in,

My Synology NAS runs Samba 3.6.9 and maps accounts using winbind. It is joined to my samba4 AD. I set "winbind use default domain=yes" and have no entry for "winbind normalize names". Strangely a group like "Domain Users" appears as "domain users", i.e. in all lower case. A translation which breaks idmapd for NFSv4. My Debian Wheezy 3.6.6 behaves the

Hi, What is the magic juju that I have to put in /etc/sysconfig/autofs to get autofs to default to using NFSv4, rather than NFSv3, for mounting file systems? I don't want to place these flags into the automount maps themselves because we have a varied network with Sun, CentOS, RedHat and Macintosh systems, and the flags that have to get added to automount maps (which we distribute centrally

We are running kernel 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 with exporting 3 aoe provided ext4 directories. For a couple of weeks we had a small number of users using the system with no issues, today we added 7 users and the system crashed and did not perform correctly since. Nov 23 10:20:03 sulphur rpc.idmapd[5199]: nfsdcb: id '-2' too big! Nov 23 10:42:25 sulphur nfsd[27306]: nfssvc: Setting version

Hi Everyone, I have been trying to setup an NFS v4 File Server but have come across an odd issue. Mounting the /nfs4exports/share appears to be successful and the information displayed about partition size and free space seem correct but if I try to do anything inside the mounted directory the client will just hang. Does anyone have any idea what I am missing?? I have try disabling all

Hi all, I have setup a CentOS6.3 x86_64 host to act as a nfs server. According to RHEL6 docs, portmap is not needed when you use NFSv4, but in my host I need to start rpcbind service to make NFSv4 works. My /etc/sysconfig/nfs # # Define which protocol versions mountd # will advertise. The values are "no" or "yes" # with yes being the default MOUNTD_NFS_V2="no"

Hai Baptiste, I re-checked my setup and your totaly correct. I can not enter the nfsV4 mounted directory as root. What i've added in idmap.conf Is this : Domain = your_DNS_domain.tld [Translation] Method = nsswitch And i found this link. http://serverfault.com/questions/526762/root-access-to-kerberized-nfsv4-host-on-ubuntu im testing this now. Greetz, Louis >

I think this is an NFS or ext4 question, but wanted to post this here for a sanity check. :) I've been searching for over a week for a solution and have turned up nil. I'm trying to rsync with options -AX over an NFSv4 mount TO an ext4 drive FROM an ext4 drive and both have acl and user_xattr enabled. The command: rsync -aAX /data/ /mnt/back/data results in: rsync:

Samba List Serve Users: Is there a document or web link that follow that describes the steps to upgrade Samba from 2.2.5 to 2.2.8? The documentation on samba.org the I have read assumes that the install is a fresh install and not an upgrade. Thanks so much, Mark Roth Systems Engineer Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (304) 598-5430 x6864

hi, i have installded samba 4 oncentos 7 and started to use as part of active directory. But i have a problemabout sharing files between samba and windows 7. i can browse and edit sharedfiles and folders on windows 7. But when i create a new folder, the owner of the folder is seen as ?#User300012?instead of the real samba user. My sharing steps 1-?????i have add a user named ?ege? on centos

On my CentOS 6.3 machine, in /etc/idmapd.conf I've updated the "[Mapping]" section of the config file: Nobody-User = paulbsch Nobody-Group = paulbsch But the mapping is not working. Files still show up as being owned by "nobody". On my Fedora 14 machine, with the exact same changes to /etc/idmapd.conf, the mapping works perfectly and the files show up as being owned by