similar to: How to disable wifi access to CentOS 7

I just applied a bunch of updates to my CentOS 7 system yesterday, one of which was a Firefox update to 68.0.1esr. Now when I bring up sites I would log in to -- my bank, credit cards, etc., the Password box is wonky and shakes and doesn't display successive dots? for characters I type, nor does it accept what I type. My work around currently is to type the password first, then my userid

Hello all -- This is not a CentOS specific question, but I have a feeling some of you are involved in enterprise malware efforts, so here goes. Does anyone have recommendations for malware detection that includes detection in image files? I'm looking for something that could be integrated into a batch cron process as opposed to a client end download check. Thanks. --

On 05/01/2017 06:10 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On May 1, 2017, at 1:33 PM, Kay Schenk <kay.schenk at gmail.com> wrote: >> What can anyone tell me about package internet-browser? >> >> Through the gnome package app, there seems to be NO meta info???? > > I can?t find any packages called 'internet-browser? for CentOS6 or 7, in either the base repos or EPEL.

On 05/02/2017 09:59 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Kay Schenk wrote: >> On 05/01/2017 06:10 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>> On May 1, 2017, at 1:33 PM, Kay Schenk <kay.schenk at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> What can anyone tell me about package internet-browser? >>>> >>>> Through the gnome package app, there seems to be NO meta info????

On 08/25/2016 10:44 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 08/25/2016 09:49 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> I do realize the sane thing to do is to have the builbots -- >> smoketest environments -- match the production environment > > > I think the sane thing to do would be to use buildbots that support LSB: > > http://www.ludism.org/~rwhe/LSB/tutorial/tut.html Great resource!

What can anyone tell me about package internet-browser? Through the gnome package app, there seems to be NO meta info???? -- ------------------------------------------ MzK "Since each of us is blessed with only one life, why not live it with a cat?" -- Robert Stearns

On 08/24/2016 07:53 PM, Peter wrote: > On 25/08/16 13:21, Kay Schenk wrote: >> To all...yes I meant glibc, not glib. Target environment -- could be any >> version of Linux. This is for Apache OpenOffice. The buildbots we've been >> using are being decommisioned due to EOL. As a developer on that project, I >> need to be able to test and use the builds. We'll be

How about $ sudo yum list installed | grep <reponame> It won?t work in CentOS 5 but it should work in 6 or 7 Val?re Binet [C] IT Security Administrator Kelly Government Solutions On-Site at the NIH NIH / NIA / IRP Tel : 410 558 8013 mailto: binetv at nia.nih.gov On 7/21/15, 5:09 PM, "Robert Wolfe" <Robert.Wolfe at malco.com> wrote: >Try: > >sudo yum

Hello all-- I kept getting messages that my old Flash Player 31 was obsolete so I went in search of an update. I came across several references for getting flash plugin 32 that basically were the same as this page -- https://www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2010/install-adobe-flash-player-10-on-fedora-centos-red-hat-rhel/ However, it seems the site -- |http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/ does NOT

My Update Applet keeps giving me messages to install an update to a package I do not have installed. To make matters more confusing, when I actually try to install the package it wants to update, there is a problem with the installation. Any tips on how to resolve this? Is this somehow caused by the repositories I have enabled? -- -------------------------------------------- MzK "We can

Hello all-- I am trying to determine what I have isntalled from a given repository. I have seen several references to "yum repo-pkgs" which I think is what would work for me, but "repo-pkgs" does not seem to be a part of yum 3.2.29. Is this a yum add on that I could get somewhere? -- -------------------------------------------- MzK "Way down deep, we're all

On 06/07/2015 04:52 PM, g wrote: > > > On 06/07/2015 05:29 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> On 06/07/2015 03:25 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > <<<>>> > >>> Yes it does replace your home directory. When I do a fresh >>> install, I back up my home directory on a usb drive and then copy >>> it back after the install. I think you can also

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 10/06/2015 05:30 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > Well I haven't tested out the CentOS 7 for i386 yet as sent in the > > message of 06/02-- > > > > https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-June/013426.html > > > > Nor have I seen any additional information. So how

On 06/10/2015 10:06 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 06/10/2015 05:25 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> I get /home/<username> not found when it's there and setup with correct >> permissions -- well here I am using it in run level 5 just fine! > > Log in as root, and watch /var/log/messages, /var/log/secure, and > /var/log/audit/audit.log while a "normal" user

On 06/11/2015 08:28 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Kay Schenk wrote: >> On 06/10/2015 10:06 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >>> On 06/10/2015 05:25 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>>> I get /home/<username> not found when it's there and >>>> setup with correct permissions -- well here I am using it >>>> in run level 5 just fine! >>> >

On 10/07/2015 01:05 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/07/2015 11:12 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: >> >>> On 10/06/2015 05:30 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>>> Well I haven't tested out the CentOS 7 for i386 yet as sent in the >>>> message of 06/02-- >>>>

On 06/07/2015 11:05 PM, g wrote: > > > On 06/07/2015 07:25 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > <<>> > >> So, I'm not sure how to interpret what you said. Can I get the same >> results from a CentOS install using some combination of options? > > because your are playing with multi flavors, > [i bet you like going to baskin-robbins for ice cream ;-) ]

... and causing me great concern at the moment. I've got a notification of 673 Software updates at the moment. I didn't see anything on this list that indicated that kind of update. Unfortunately, the "Details" option which would normally show me what repo is providing the updates, does not seem to provide any information. Anyone else having this problem? Not happy... :( --

On 06/07/2015 03:25 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > On Sun, 2015-06-07 at 15:16 -0700, Kay Schenk wrote: >> If I choose to do a fresh install of CentOS 6 with "replace existing >> Linux systems", will it also wipe out my /home directory? In the past >> when I've done this with another Linux distro, /home was not >> affected. >> >> Or, would I

Hello all-- Due to a proposed changeover to build machines for a project I'm involved with, I need at least glib 2.19. Right now I have glib 2.12, and even on CentOS7-32 bit, what I see is glib 2.14. Is a higher glib available anywhere that might work with my current 6.8. I see I can download it from SourceForge but I am wondering what the results might me. I really like CentOS and would