similar to: netmask set with ifconfig doesn't hold

I should have mentioned that I tried nmtui but found no settings for a netmask anywhere.? like I said ?. dummy.KM On Thursday, March 14, 2019, 11:39:09 AM EDT, Pete Biggs <pete at biggs.org.uk> wrote: On Thu, 2019-03-14 at 15:12 +0000, KM via CentOS wrote: > I gather that ifconfig is a way of setting the netmask in the current > shell instead of a persistent value.? I say this

On Thu, 2019-03-14 at 15:12 +0000, KM via CentOS wrote: > I gather that ifconfig is a way of setting the netmask in the current > shell instead of a persistent value. I say this because I am running > it and see it for my specific network interface, directly after > running it. > However if I restart the network service the netmask is reverted to > the previous value. > What

On Thu, 2019-03-14 at 15:42 +0000, KM via CentOS wrote: > I should have mentioned that I tried nmtui but found no settings for > a netmask anywhere. like I said ?. dummy. It's part of the IP address - so you put something like 192.168.0.1/24 for a 255.255.255.0 subnet. It's called a CIDR address. P.

Hello everyone Iam trying to delete a route from mt CentOs 7 server but everytime i restart network services, it reappears iam using command "route del -net x.x.x.x/x gw x.x.x.x <interface name>" Am i missing something?? Best Regards Mulin

I wasn't sure what to call this in the subject line, but here's my issue. I have an occasional need to switch a few computers from one Internet provider to a different one. Both Internet providers feed into the same network, one at 192.168.0.1 and the other at 192.168.0.254. So to change from one provider to the other I run nmtui to change the gateway and dns server addresses, then

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Subscriber <ml-lists at agoris.net.ua> wrote: > Hello FrancisM, > > Thursday, April 7, 2016, 8:03:38 AM, you wrote: > > > > I tried last night and it seems like the vlans that I created is failing > to > > bring-up. So this is what Im doing > > > in my DATA trunk port at my HomeLab Im doing this > > > 2 port

Once again I am building a headless Centos 7 box that needs to reliably be on both the LAN and WIFI network at all times. Amongst other things it's going to be an AirPrint bridge enabling IPads to print to printers on a different VLAN. I have asked about this before and got a solution working using nmtui to set up both the LAN and WIFI interface, and activate them. However, the WIFI

On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:34:43 +0100, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 07:58, Asle Ommundsen <aommundsen at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Tonight I upgraded two CentOS 8 boxes to CentOS 8.1 (1911). Then after a >> reboot of the first server the network was unavailable. In IPMI console >>

Does Centos 7 use /etc/sysconfig/network or is this replaced by some systemctl set of commands. For example I know to set my host name with: hostnamectl set-hostname nevia.htt-consult.com But I don't know if this is the same as cat <<EOF>/etc/sysconfig/network || exit 1 NETWORKING=yes HOSTNAME=nevia.htt-consult.com EOF

Hi, Tonight I upgraded two CentOS 8 boxes to CentOS 8.1 (1911). Then after a reboot of the first server the network was unavailable. In IPMI console everything except the network was looking good. Network was unreachable. No errors in NetworkManager. I also restarted NetworkManager, but it did not help. Then I discovered that the default gateway suddenly was missing. Then I rebooted the

First off - let me say I am not an administrator.?? I need to know?if there is an easy way to increase my /boot partition.? When I installed CentOS 6 after running 5, it was my oversight not to increase the /boot size.? it's too small and I can't do yum updates. if it's not easy to actually increase it, is it safe to take a chunk in my root filesystem (like /new.boot or something) and

Dear CentOS-Community, we are facing the following issue: A secondary ip address seems to be automatically added to a nic which causes several issues in our setup. This server is equipped with four nics which are currently in use: # nmcli con show NAME????? UUID????????????????????????????????? TYPE????? DEVICE eno2????? cb6fcb54-be52-4ab6-8324-88091a0ea1a0? ethernet? eno2 eno4?????

Once upon a time, Lists <lists at benjamindsmith.com> said: > I understand that it's possible to allow the 4 VM guest systems to each have a > "direct" fixed IP address and access the addresses \via the host network > adapter, while the host retains its fixed IP. If you are running NetworkManager (the default), it's not too hard. Here's an example

Hi, I have to do some maintenance on a CentOS 7 proxy installed on a routerboard without a video card. The only way to access this machine directly is via Minicom and serial port. I'm using NetworkManager TUI (nmtui) to configure network interfaces, but Ncurses rendering in Minicom works in the sense that chickens fly and horses swim. What you get is a forest of question marks with a few

In CentOS 6.7 I ran setup command and I could configure network settings from that "gui" utility at command line. In CentOS 7 I don't know where this goes or how to enabled. I have installed a few packages: yum install setuptool -y \ && yum install system-config-network-tui -y \ && yum install system-config-firewall* -y \ && yum install

On Tuesday 10 January 2017 08:53:17 John R Pierce wrote: > On 1/9/2017 7:11 PM, fred roller wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Frank Cox<theatre at melvilletheatre.com> > > > > wrote: > >> That sounds like a weak signal from your wifi transmitter. > > > > Or signal interference. Where is the antennae located on the server? > > Ran

Le 18/02/2020 ? 12:28, Anand Buddhdev a ?crit?: > Neither. The DNS configuration should not normally be bound to a > specific interface, so don't configure it with any interface. If you do, > and that interface goes down, your DNS config also disappears. I would like to do that very much, only NetworkManager makes you jump through burning loops to do so. With network-scripts, it

On 02/16/2017 02:32 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 16 February 2017 at 10:17, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >> On 02/16/2017 02:03 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> >>> On 16 February 2017 at 09:09, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 02/16/2017 12:54 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: >>>>>

Hi, I'm running CentOS 7 on all my servers, in three different contexts : 1. simple local server 2. public facing server 3. router/gateway/firewall I'm currently in the process of moving my KISS-style network-scripts-style configurations to something more orthodox based on NetworkManager. Scenarios (1) and (2) caused no problems, but (3) is giving me some headache. Let me

On 02/16/2017 03:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 16 February 2017 at 10:42, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >> On 02/16/2017 02:32 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> >>> On 16 February 2017 at 10:17, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 02/16/2017 02:03 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>>>>