similar to: Performing post-installation setup tasks - for 75 minutes

On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 18:19 +0000, Gary Stainburn wrote: > I'm doing a new install, and everything seems to have gone fine apart from the > incredible amount of time it's taken. > > It does have 6 x 4TB drives in RAID6 and I am installing from a USB DVD drive > as I had no SATA ports left, but this is getting rediculous. > > I chose a simple install (the one above

Gary Stainburn wrote: > I'm doing a new install, and everything seems to have gone fine apart > from the incredible amount of time it's taken. > > It does have 6 x 4TB drives in RAID6 and I am installing from a USB DVD > drive as I had no SATA ports left, but this is getting rediculous. > > I chose a simple install (the one above file and print server) and added >

> I'm doing a new install, and everything seems to have gone fine apart from > the > incredible amount of time it's taken. > > It does have 6 x 4TB drives in RAID6 and I am installing from a USB DVD > drive > as I had no SATA ports left, but this is getting rediculous. Maybe you could try a network install and only use the USB DVD to boot. I remember similar issues

I've just finished installing a new Bacula storeage server. Prior to doing the install I did some research and ended up deciding to do the following config. 6x4TB drives /boot/efi efi_fs sda1 /boot/efi_copy efi_fs sdb1 /boot xfs RAID1 sda2 sdb2 VG RAID6 all drives containing SWAP / /home /var/bacula Questions: 1) The big problem with this is that it is dependant on sda for

I've got a very small footprint rack server with a 4TB drive in that I wish to be a Bacula storeage device. However, it's got an old board / processor in it. Can anyone recommend a Dist that would work on it?

On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 6:03 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 04:02:17PM +0300, Ram Lavi wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 3:33 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 03:21:17PM +0300, Ram Lavi wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > > >

I have two openvz servers running Centos 6.x both with 32GB of RAM. One is an Intel Xeon E3-1230 quad core with two 4TB 7200 SATA drives in software RAID1. The other is an old HP DL380 dual quad core with 8 750GB 2.5" SATA drives in hardware RAID6. I want to figure out which one has better random I/O performance to host a busy container. The DL380 currently has one failed drive in the

Thanks for your help. I did pick up an additional entry in the audit file : type=AVC msg=audit(1504561395.709:10196): avc: denied { execute } for pid=19163 comm="/usr/sbin/httpd" name="s.check.cgi" dev="dm-0" ino=537182029 scontext=system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t:s0 tclass=file Unfortunately, I am not sure how the

hi, i use libvirt 1.0.2 (-r1 , gentoo linux). when i create a vm with win7 guest, virtio nic, virtio hdd, all is running fine. but when i shutdown the windows guest, it takes somestimes 20-34 minutes !!! iotop shows me in the whole time writing with 2,xxmb/sec. is the complete machine "rewritten" to disk? i use disk.images on a raid6, but hey, dd shows me it can writes there with

If we''ve abandoned the idea of putting the number of redundant blocks into the top bits of the type bitmask (and I hope we have), then we''re fairly much there. Current code is at: git://, http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/btrfs-raid56.git git://, http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/btrfs-progs-raid56.git We have recovery working, as well as both full-stripe writes

On Friday 31 August 2018 18:20:20 Warren Young wrote: > You?re giving two very mixed signals here. > > ?Old Pentium,? as someone else said, can mean anything back to 1993, but ?4 > TB drive? suggests something far newer than that. > > I ask because that affects the expected energy draw of the server. If it?s > old, it could be 200 W or so. If you?re using ?old? rather

My google-fu appears to be weak today... I currently have 8*4Tb in a RAID6. So far I'm only using 6Tb PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree Used /dev/md6 Large lvm2 a-- 21.83t 15.37t 6.46t Let's say I wanted to remove 2 of these disks from the array and shrink it down to a 6*4Tb How would I do this? -- rgds Stephen

We (a small college with about 3000 active accounts) are currently in the process of moving from UW IMAP running on linux to dovecot running on a cluster of 3 or 4 new faster Linux machines. (Initially using perdition to split the load.) As we are building and designing the system, I'm attempting to take (or find) benchmarks everywhere I can in order to make informed decisions and so

On 30.07.2019 20:07, Tom Diehl via dovecot wrote: > > Does anyone have an Idea how to fix this? > > Regards, > Perhaps see if there are any denials in SELinux audit log: sudo grep denied /var/log/audit/audit.log | grep dovecot | audit2allow -a Good luck, Reio

On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 3:33 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 03:21:17PM +0300, Ram Lavi wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > tl;dr, can you point me to the point in the libvirt repo where it's > trying > > to change a tap-device's SELinux label? > > > > I am trying to create a tap device with libvirt on

> Hi, > > Does anyone have glusterfs as vmware datastore working in production in a > real world case? How to serve the glusterfs cluster? As iscsi, NFS? > > Hi, I am using glusterfs 3.10.x for VMware ESXi 5.5 NFS DataStore. Our Environment is - 4 node supermicro server (each 50TB, NL SAS 4TB used, LSI 9260-8i) - Totally 100TB service volume - 10G Storage Network and Service

Installed Packages Name : postfix Arch : x86_64 Epoch : 2 Version : 2.6.6 Release : 6.el6_5 Size : 9.7 M Repo : installed >From repo : updates I am seeing several of these in our maillog file after a restart of the Postfix service: Apr 23 12:48:27 inet08 setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /usr/libexec/postfix/smtp from 'read, write'

Hi What is the general state of btrfs RAID6 as of kernel 3.13-rc1 and the latest btrfs tools? More specifically: - Is it able to correct errors during scrubs? - Is it able to transparently handle disk failures without downtime? - Is it possible to convert btrfs RAID10 to RAID6 without recreating the fs? - Is it possible to add/remove drives to a RAID6 array? Regards, Hans-Kristian -- To

On 04/26/2017 12:29 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > But the policy generates errors. I will have to submit a bug report, > it seems A bug report would probably be helpful. I'm looking back at the message you wrote describing errors in ld-2.17.so. I think what's happening is that the policy on your system includes a silent rule that somehow breaks your system. You'll need

Hi all, we got a new test system here and I just also tested btrfs raid6 on that. Write performance is slightly lower than hw-raid (LSI megasas) and md-raid6, but it probably would be much better than any of these two, if it wouldn''t read all the during the writes. Is this a known issue? This is with linux-3.9.2. Thanks, Bernd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line