similar to: Python 2.7.5 and GnuPG sig verify

Okay looks like uv.h is in /usr/include - I didn't catch that until reading the message. So the pkgconfig file is likely correct and not a bug. Probably then a bug in the makefile for what I'm building (newer cmake - bootstrap builds, it's post bootstrap that fails) On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 9:48 PM Michael Peters <pipfroschpress at gmail.com> wrote: > EPEL package but I think

EPEL package but I think there's a packaging bug, thought I would ask here. Trying to build something that requires libuv-devel - it finds the .so but can't determine version. header files are in /usr/include/uv however the pkgconfig file specifies /usr/include as the include directory. The pkgconfig file also has the version so I'm not sure why the make file can't determine

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Dan Sanduleac<sanduleac.dan at gmail.com> wrote: > Oh, I see. Didn't think of this, thanks! > > So, just to be clear, there's no binding overhead in Cython because the > functions defined there are pure python, right? (The function objects I > mean). Whereas the ones I defined in Boost are more expensive to call. > > On Wed, Aug

Hi, I have one question about python update. How to update python 2.7.5 to python 2.7.15 on centos 7.4? Thanks! Regards Andrew

I'm cc:-ing my reply to xapian-devel, since others may have an opinion. In particular, James has probably done most work on the python bindings. On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 03:56:23PM -0800, Jason Toffaletti wrote: > I'm curious if boost::python has been considered for creating more > pythonic bindings to Xapian. I've used it to wrap several C++ libraries > and found the

I'd might think about that, I have created quite a few Python bindings and, oddly enough, do enjoy it, probably just because of how easy boost::python makes it (I have always manually done it directly using that, but because of the sheer size of LLVM I may use a code generator to generate the basics, and yes I know how to manually create python C modules without any binder, but boost::python

since there's already a Python wrapper for libogg and libvorbis, it occurred to me: Why not write a Python wrapper for libogg and libvorbis? http://dingoskidneys.com/oggpy/ this is the 0.001 release. "release early.." it requires Boost.Python, possibly CVS Boost.Python, available from http://boost.org/ partly because it's not finished but mostly because it's written with

Hi, Recently, I made an R package that used the C++ library Boost.Thread (http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_54_0/doc/html/thread.html) for multithreading. Previously, I have posted a question at stackoverflow (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19651954/is-it-possible-to-build-an-r-package-which-use-rcpp-and-boost-thread-on-http), and I also asked at rcpp-devel

Hi, I've been working on a competing Python wrapper for ogg, vorbis, and theora, and if you are someone who knows about boost.python and would like to test my package for me I would appreciate it. Especially re: compiler errors and how to get it to reliably work on other's computers. The wrapper should be advanced enough to add comments or show comments on a theora stream, and to

Jarno, This looks like it could be very valuable - thanks for making it available. Just out of curiosity, do you have any specific uses in mind for which you created these bindings? --Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ On Feb 23, 2005, at 5:21 PM, Jarno Seppänen wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to share my experimental LLVM API Python bindings with >

DEAR SIR. I am HAJIYA MARYAM ABACHA, wife of the late Nigeria Head of State,General Sanni Abacha who died on the 8th of June, 1998 while still on active duty. l am contacting you in view of the fact that we will be of great assistance to each other likeness developing a cordial relationship. I currently have within my reach the sum of FIFTY TWO MILLION US Dollars (US$52,000,000.00) cash which l

DEAR SIR. I am HAJIYA MARYAM ABACHA, wife of the late Nigeria Head of State,General Sanni Abacha who died on the 8th of June, 1998 while still on active duty. l am contacting you in view of the fact that we will be of great assistance to each other likeness developing a cordial relationship. I currently have within my reach the sum of FIFTY TWO MILLION US Dollars (US$52,000,000.00) cash which l

Eric van Riet Paap wrote: > The boost Python are not (yet) part of LLVM so I suppose it would make > most sense to try to makes fixes/changes so they would work for 1.7 and > then try to get them into LLVM CVS. I tried compiling the bindings, and it seems that it would not be too much work to compile them for 1.7. I'm not familiar enough with LLVM to assess how complete the

Hi, I would like to share my experimental LLVM API Python bindings with the LLVM enthusiasts. I have created Boost.Python wrappers largely for the VMCore interface and other selected interfaces (e.g. ExecutionEngine). The bindings provide direct runtime access to the LLVM bytecode and JIT execution features from Python. The bindings are complete enough so that one can e.g. run the Fibonacci

On 24-Jun-2001 Josh Coalson wrote: > hmm, I didn't see a bug report yet... can you make the .wav file > available for download? also, what version and options did you > use? this is interesting; I haven't seen a verify error in a > long time. > > Josh I also had this verify error encoding a wav I ripped from a CD. I didn't report this as it happended on flac

On 24-Jun-2001 Matt Zimmerman wrote: >> [...] >> ERROR during encoding, state = 15:FLAC__ENCODER_MEMORY_ALLOCATION_ERROR > > This error appeared in the other report as well. It looks like a memory > allocation failure is the cause of the problem. Is the error easily > reproducible given the failed WAV file? Yes, always the same error - but only (no joke) on option -8 ,

Hi, The person that developed the bindings is Jarno Seppänen , he sent me the code a few weeks ago. They were build with Boost.Python. The latest version was for LLVM 1.6 and the bindings seem to be unmaintained at the moment. From what I could tell they are very clean and probably easy to maintain/update to LLVM 1.7. From what I could tell from the email archive they were not far from

In business theres no word more powerful than the word. And what is the word? P-R-O-F-I-T!!! And thats what our next feature is all about. EverGlory International (EGLY) is involved in one of the most lucrative areas of business these days, production in China. Quarter after quarter they get to use the word in BIG ways! Some recent quarterly postings: 1mil$ P-R-O-F-I-T in the first

In business theres no word more powerful than the word. And what is the word? P-R-O-F-I-T!!! And thats what our next feature is all about. EverGlory International (EGLY) is involved in one of the most lucrative areas of business these days, production in China. Quarter after quarter they get to use the word in BIG ways! Some recent quarterly postings: 1mil$ P-R-O-F-I-T in the first

On 9 Aug 2018, at 10:09, Katja Abramova <katja.abramova at dimension.it> wrote: > I need to do a search for a > multi-word query in which particular fields are boosted - preferably at > query time. That is, given a query like "the cat is lying on the mat" (with > an OR operator, ignoring word positions but with stemming and stop words > removed), I'd like to