similar to: Network switch to IPV6 after PXE boot

Le 18/02/2019 ? 18:58, Tru Huynh a ?crit?: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 06:36:10PM +0100, Patrick B?gou wrote: > ... >> - PXE boot start and the desktop load the kernel and the inirtd file >> >> - the kernel is booted and at this time the led of the network switch >> goes down for the port used by the desktop. >> >> - then I have a message "no carrier

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 06:36:10PM +0100, Patrick B?gou wrote: ... > > - PXE boot start and the desktop load the kernel and the inirtd file > > - the kernel is booted and at this time the led of the network switch > goes down for the port used by the desktop. > > - then I have a message "no carrier detected on interface em1" > > - followed by " IPv6

Issue Statement: PXE booting from BIOS systems works fine on both 6.03 and 6.04-pre1. New clients only support (u)EFI which results in the inability to load remote kernel or initrd. Tested with both Syslinux 6.03 and 6.04-pre1. So far unable to boot any (u)EFI clients unless both initrd and kernel are on PXE server. Using packet captures I see that the URI request for the remote file on the repo

I have just installed (with kikstart) centOS6.4 on a PC which was previously running OpenSUSE (11.x). This PC has an apple keyboard and I'm unable to setup this keyboard. In .xsession-errors I get this messages : Error: No Symbols named "latin9" in the include file "macintosh_vndr/fr" Exiting Abandoning symbols file

Anyone has gone to the trouble of creating an install initrd for 5.2 that has (a working) r8169 module built into it? Mainly for kickstarts. -Drew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20081209/befe8549/attachment-0003.html>

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Nathan.Wittie--- via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Issue Statement: > PXE booting from BIOS systems works fine on both 6.03 and 6.04-pre1. New clients only support (u)EFI which results in the inability to load remote kernel or initrd. Tested with both Syslinux 6.03 and 6.04-pre1. So far unable to boot any (u)EFI clients unless both initrd and

Hi all, I have a problem during the lauching of my first virtual image. First thing : domain 0 is on fedora core 6 (probably a xen package made in fedora :-S, sorry ...) Second thing : the error is really traditional (i already had it with uml) but there i am blocking. here my config file (for image on logical volume, swap too) root = "/dev/sda1 ro" [root@p-virtvip8 xen]# cat p-virtser9

Hi Some time ago there was a discussion on the above subject. I have scanned the past few month's mailing list archives and cannot find the relevant mail(s). Could somebody please repost the solution or point me at the correct resource. I would also appreciate advice on how to do this on a RHEL4 server being updated with up2date. Is it safe just to delete the old kernel and initrd

Hi all, I compiled and installed Xen 3.2 source on FC8. Compilation and installation completed with no errors. However when I try to load Xen I get an error: Kernel panic - Attempted to kill init !!! This is my grub configuration: # grub.conf generated by anaconda # # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file # NOTICE: You have a /boot partition. This means

Hi! I'm in China now and my Internet connexion is very bad. I ever use the best ADSL provider that I can have. In some case (often), the connexion is lost. At the first time, tincd will wait few time and retry. But, this delay is increased if the connexion can't be made... so, it's quicker to kill tincd and restart it. How it possible to make tincd restart if the connexion

I have ASTCC installed, and compare it with NuFone, however, I find that the billing of NuFone is always a few secondes more (6 to 24 seconds) Does anybody has an explanation / solution for it? bye Ronald

Once upon a time, Lists <lists at benjamindsmith.com> said: > I understand that it's possible to allow the 4 VM guest systems to each have a > "direct" fixed IP address and access the addresses \via the host network > adapter, while the host retains its fixed IP. If you are running NetworkManager (the default), it's not too hard. Here's an example

Shorewall 4.5.15 3 Interface setup em1 p3p1 p4p4 ppp0 Hi, Since changing to NetworkManger on Fedora 18 I can no longer connect to the DSL Modem, which is connected to Interface em1. When the NetworkManger brings up the interfaces and ppp0, it no longer assigns an IP to em1. If I have ppp0 disabled and NetworkManger brings up the interfaces, em1 gets an IP of 192.168.1.2. Then when I get

My manager tells me a system in the datacenter is down. I go down there, and plug in a monitor-on-a-stick and keyboard. It's up, but no network. I try systemctl restart NetworkManager several times, and ip a shows *no* change. Finally, I do an ifdown, followed by an ifup, and everything's wonderful. My manager thinks that the NM daemon thinks everything's fine, and there've been

Hey, I have KVM installed on my Fedora 17 box. I added the network interfaces of the virtual machines to the openvswitch bridge as follows: ____ ____ / VM1\______br0_______/ em1\ \____/ | \____/ | _|_ /VM2\ \____/ virbr0 is the virtual network switch VM1 and VM2 are on the same subnet having tap interfaces vnet0 and vnet1 respectively. em1 is the default

dear All, I'm facing this routing problem, the setup is actualy part of ltsp, but I think this problem is Centos-specific. The server is a Dell Poweredge R210. The install is standard 6.4, updated. I have one nic facing the public internet: vi /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em1 DEVICE=em1 BOOTPROTO=none HWADDR=d4:ae:52:c1:28:2b NM_CONTROLLED=no ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet

I have a physical host with a single physical network adapter. I want to host several VMs on host. (guest1 - guest4) The guest systems are accessible via 192.168.122.* as is the default with qemu/virsh. There are 4 IP addresses being routed to the primary interface on host. I can set up an alias for the NIC and "see" these ip addresses. I understand that it's possible to allow

We just got DELL R920 and installed Centos 6.5 on it.? After installation, network not function.? We manually enter IP address, gateway and netmark on "em1".? we also do following: 1. startup NetworkManager 2. /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em1? ==> NM_CONTROOLED=yes I tried to startup network and get error message: Bring up interface em1: connection activation failed

Hi, Is there a way to add another extension to a live dial, for example Dial(PJSIP/1000,,) and after 20 secondes change it to Dial(PJSIP/1000&PJSIP/1001,,) I am open to suggestions such as using manager or stasis. Thanks in advance. Best regards, Kkh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I still have a problem with samba and profiles. The profile is correctly written to the profile share. but when i logon a other computer, logon takes ages.. and im unable to do anything registry is locked for example. ( see logs below ) when i copy the network profile to the local computer there is no problem. ( because the local profile is used ) OS : Linux Kernel 2.6.11 ( custom build