similar to: Did I install too much for clamav?

On 2/7/19 1:18 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > Feb 07 08:16:59 klovia.htt-consult.com amavis[6327]: Using primary > internal av scanner code for ClamAV-clamd > Feb 07 08:16:59 klovia.htt-consult.com amavis[6327]: Found secondary > av scanner ClamAV-clamscan at /usr/bin/clamscan I don't use amavis, but it doesn't seem surprising that it would search the system for

On 2/19/19 1:50 AM, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: > > > On 17.2.2019 10.46, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: >> >>> On 17 February 2019 at 10:38 Odhiambo Washington via dovecot < >>> dovecot at dovecot.org <mailto:dovecot at dovecot.org>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 at 11:34, Marc Weustink via dovecot < >>>

Dear Friends, I have postfix mail server When I try to install amavisd-new, clamAV, SpamAssassin follow this link "http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd". I have done all the configuration after that when I restart clamav So It is giving my this error message Stopping Clam AntiVirus Daemon: [FAILED] Starting Clam AntiVirus Daemon: LibClamAV Error:

> On 20 February 2019 15:10 Robert Moskowitz via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > > > > On 2/19/19 1:50 AM, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On 17.2.2019 10.46, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 17 February

Regarding the brilliant wiki site: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd?highlight=%28Amavis%29 I faced the following issue on CentOS 6.2: "Spamassind" saves each message and its attached part in a folder in clamd accesses the folder, creates itself a temporary folder and deletes it afterwards. This was stopped by SELinux and caused the virus scan to fail. This action causes SE-Linux

Hello list readers, I am doing rsync backups based on Mike Rubels recipe (http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots/). I am creating lvm snapshots of partitions whose contents changes fast. In order to verify if evyerthing went ok, I do md5sum checks on all files and everytime some files are failing the test. Here is a list of them: ./amavis/db/__db.001: FAILED ./amavis/db/__db.002:

after cleaning up a bunch or selinux alerts, I update and wham, clamav/clamd/clamav-db make me assert contexts again to /var/clamav like... chcon -t clamd_t clamav -R which temporarily solves the problem but it would be better if it were policy and not file contexts. So I search and see for some reason, /var/clamav is ignored... # grep clam /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts

We have a perl cgi script that accepts uploaded files and runs clamscan on them. While observing the system performance I noticed that each clamscan process consumes up to 250MB of RAM. Is this normal for ClamAV? This seems like an enormous amount of RAM, for simply scanning one file for viruses.

Török Edwin wrote: > Yes, I have uploaded the .tar.gz here: > http://edwintorok.googlepages.com/ClamAV-srcflat.tar.gz > [inputs dir contains some symlink, place ClamAV dir in > llvm/projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Applications to make > links point to right place] > > Hi, Because llvm bug #1730 got fixed, this testcase can run under with the JIT on x86-64 :). I have

Hi, We are getting closer. 1. In Makefile, all the references to CFLAGS should be CPPFLAGS instead. 2. filterdiff.sh uses sed -re. This causes a problem on Mac OS X where -E means using extended regular expression, not -r. sed: illegal option -- r usage: sed script [-Ealn] [-i extension] [file ...] sed [-Ealn] [-i extension] [-e script] ... [-f script_file] ... [file ...] Can this

I've filed http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1912 for the optimizer bug. Evan On Jan 10, 2008, at 11:28 AM, Evan Cheng wrote: > Hi, > > We are getting closer. > > 1. In Makefile, all the references to CFLAGS should be CPPFLAGS > instead. > 2. filterdiff.sh uses sed -re. This causes a problem on Mac OS X where > -E means using extended regular expression, not

Hi list, I have installed ClamAV from rpmforge and followed the excellent CentOS how to on installing amavisd - all has appeared to just work as advertised - thanks to all those involved in getting these instructions together. Come time to upgrade to 5.3 and ClamAV 0.95 (logwatch has been encouraging me to do the ClamAV upgrade for a week or two) All appeared to work fine. However I now notice

is it possible to parse an e-mail to 2 AV? when the server recieve an e-mail with attachment it will run on both AV? in amavis' logs i can only see one AV which is nai. And i also noticed that clamd configuration in amavisd.conf is on the av_scanners_backup part.

Evan Cheng wrote: > Hi Edwin, > > I ran into two problems. > > 1. Using your config file and Makefile, I ran into issue compiling > with gcc: > > Looks like it's a makefile issue? > Should be solved with the new flattened source layout and Makefile (-I. was missing) > 2. prepare.sh getdb doesn't work for me because I don't have wget. > > Is it

Hello all, I am trying to replace a RH 7.1 (ouch!) box that has been running postfix 1.x/clamav/SA/amavisd-new on which the amavis/PF/SA packages have not been updated because of the way they were built/configured. I would like to use CentOS to do this. Having followed the thread regarding perl versioning issues with the latest version of amavisd-new and CentOS Base I am thinking I should pursue

I was getting nowhere with my clamav permissions problem, so I blew away my test system and did a total rebuild. I am now up to the part right after the install of amavis-new, clamav, clamav-devel, and clamd all from the epel.repo (spamassassin, also installed at the same time comes from the base repo). Prior to this, I rebuild the system from my kickstart file, and did the postfix,

Everyone, I am putting together a new CentOS 7 mail server for our organization and am having some difficulty getting clamav to work with the clamav- milter for sendmail. I have set /etc/clamd.d/scan.conf to use clamscan as the user as well as root as the user and the status command of systemctl results in the same error messages : ? clamd at scan.service - Generic clamav scanner daemon

On 22/08/16 02:10, Jay Hart wrote: > Hello gents, > > First time poster here! > > Current system running Centos 6.8. Buddy of mine posted a few days back about me wanting to move > from Postfix 2.6.x to 2.8 to above, still under centos 6.8. I might move over to 7, but probably > not for a while, don't have the resources presently to make this happen. > > Running

Chris Lattner wrote: > One way to do this is to add a "cut down" version of the app to the > test suite. I disabled optional features in clamav-config.h > >> 2. GPL license. Chris? > > Any open source license that allows unrestricted redistribution is > fine in llvm-test Ok, I have created a script that automatically checks out ClamAV 0.92-stable source code

I should probably find either the amavis or clam list(s) and take this there? Anyway, I have totally rebuilt my machine with clean installs. I have spent time carefully (I hope!) studying the amavis and clamav conf files before starting them and running the tests. Here is what I am getting: Jan 30 14:14:10 test1 postfix/pickup[6682]: DA8082A099B: uid=0 from=<root> Jan 30 14:14:10