similar to: SELinux policy vs. static web content

On 09/09/2018 07:19 AM, Daniel Walsh wrote: > sesearch -A -s httpd_t -t system_conf_t -p read > > If you feel that these files should not be part of the base_ro_files > then we should open that for discussion. I think the question was how users would know that the policy allowed access, as he was printing rules affecting httpd_t's file read access, and looking for

Hi: I have been using Dovecot for well over a year now and it has always worked with few problems. The mail setup is not simple... Postfix+MailScanner+ClamAV+Docvecot+MySql+postfix.admin... just to mention the major things. The system is CentOS 5.3 on VMware. The maildir is on an NFS share, index and control is local. About a month ago I thought I upgraded from 1.1.x to 1.2.x. by doing an

Le 30/01/2019 ? 16:22, Nicolas Kovacs a ?crit?: > Some time ago I wrote an introductory article about SELinux on my blog. > I'm currently updating it for my new blog, and I found a curious change > in SELinux policy. Here goes. > > For demonstration purposes, I'm using some static webpages, more exactly > the default pages found in /usr/share/httpd/noindex, which I

Am 09.09.2018 um 14:49 schrieb Daniel Walsh <dwalsh at redhat.com>: > > On 09/08/2018 09:50 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: >> Any SElinux expert here - briefly: >> >> # getenforce >> Enforcing >> >> # sesearch -ACR -s httpd_t -c file -p read |grep system_conf_t >> <no output> >> >> # sesearch -ACR -s httpd_t -c file

I want to put the document root for an application on a separate paritition that has more space. When I try to configure this I can't access the files in the new location. I've got the SELinux attributes set on the directory and its files, so I'm thinking it's something about the parent path that SELinux doesn't like, but I don't know where that's handled. My

Am 09.09.2018 um 16:19 schrieb Daniel Walsh <dwalsh at redhat.com>: > > On 09/09/2018 09:43 AM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: >> Am 09.09.2018 um 14:49 schrieb Daniel Walsh <dwalsh at redhat.com>: >>> On 09/08/2018 09:50 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: >>>> Any SElinux expert here - briefly: >>>> >>>> # getenforce

Having problems starting httpd & portmapper #service httpd start /usr/sbin/httpd: error while loading shared libraries: libm.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory and I traced it to selinux, which I had just turned on for the first time: # sestatus SELinux status: enabled SELinuxfs mount: /selinux Current mode:

Hi, how do I allow lighttpd access to a directory like this: dr-xrwxr-x. lighttpd example unconfined_u:object_r:samba_share_t:s0 files_articles I tried to create and install a selinux module, and it didn?t work. The non-working module can not be removed, either: semodule -r lighttpd-files_articles.pp libsemanage.semanage_direct_remove_key: Unable to remove module lighttpd-files_articles.pp at

Any SElinux expert here - briefly: # getenforce Enforcing # sesearch -ACR -s httpd_t -c file -p read |grep system_conf_t <no output> # sesearch -ACR -s httpd_t -c file -p read |grep syslog_conf_t <no output> # ls -laZ /etc/sysctl.conf /etc/rsyslog.conf -rw-r--r--. root root system_u:object_r:syslog_conf_t:s0 /etc/rsyslog.conf -rw-r--r--. root root

Hi, I've got a Centos 5 box (recently replaced a Centos4 box of the same function). The means of applying custom SELinux policy has changed somewhat from 4->5. I've got it mostly figured out; I have a local.te file with my custom policy and also which defines a few new file types, and a local.fc with appropriate defintions of file contexts. When I run: # checkmodule -M -m -o

On Feb 26, 2020, at 08:52, Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote: > >> Le 26/02/2020 ? 11:51, Nicolas Kovacs a ?crit : >> SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/python2.7 from read access on the file disable. >> ***** Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests ***** >> If you believe that python2.7 should be allowed read access on the disable file by default.

Hello CentOS / RedHat / IBM folks! I am wondering if I can get a communication channel opened with someone who can affect changes win upstream RHEL? I don't have support accounts with RHEL, and use CentOS almost exclusively. I did have a direct email conversation with Mr. Daniel Walsh regarding these problems, but his answer was to create custom policy to allow what's being denied, as

Hello, After a yum update last night, I had a CenOS 5.4 i386 system pull in the following selinux updates: Jan 07 21:39:14 Updated: selinux-policy-2.4.6-255.el5_4.3.noarch Jan 07 21:39:31 Updated: selinux-policy-targeted-2.4.6-255.el5_4.3.noarch This machine has SELinux set to Enforcing. This morning, I see I got the following email from Cron: /etc/cron.daily/0logwatch: sendmail: warning:

I want you all to see what I went through trying to simply reassign (unsuccessfully) the context of a well-known port. To the best of my ability to recall none of the packages mentioned below are even installed on the host in question. Why are these dependices preventing me from removing a disused SELinux policy. I have done exactly that, reassign port contexts, in the past without encountering

Hi, Some time ago I had SELinux problems with Fail2ban. One of the users on this list suggested that it might be due to the fact that I'm using a bone-headed iptables script instead of FirewallD. I've spent the past few weeks getting up to date with doing things in a more orthodox manner. So currently my internet-facing CentOS server has a nicely configured NetworkManager, and

Thanks for your help. I did pick up an additional entry in the audit file : type=AVC msg=audit(1504561395.709:10196): avc: denied { execute } for pid=19163 comm="/usr/sbin/httpd" name="s.check.cgi" dev="dm-0" ino=537182029 scontext=system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t:s0 tclass=file Unfortunately, I am not sure how the

Hello, I'm using HP homeserver where host system run CentOS 6.3 with KVM virtualization with SELinux enabled, guests too run the same OS (but without SELinux, but this does not matter). Host system installed on mirrors based on sda and sdb physical disks. sd{c..f} disks attached to KVM guest (whole disks, not partitions; needed to use zfs (zfsonlinux) benefit features). Problem is that disks

On 02/21/2017 11:46 AM, Zdenek Sedlak wrote: > On 2017-02-21 17:30, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> postfixadmin setup.php is claiming: >> >> *Error: Smarty template compile directory templates_c is not writable.* >> *Please make it writable.* >> *If you are using SELinux or AppArmor, you might need to adjust their >> setup to allow write access.* >>

Hi, I'm currently fiddling with Nginx on CentOS 7. Eventually I want to use it instead of Apache on some servers. Apache works more or less out of the box with SELinux. My websites are all stored under /var/www, and ls -Z shows me that all files created under /var/www are correctly labeled httpd_sys_content_t. On my sandbox server I don't have Apache (httpd) installed, only Nginx

I have a webpage feedback form that uses a Perl script to send e-mails with "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -t". It works just fine, but SELinux is complaining about it: SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/postdrop (postfix_postdrop_t) "getattr" to pipe:[41117] (httpd_t) I'm a SELinux newb so I don't know what (if anything) to do about it. Suggestions? Miark