similar to: Docker on Centos 7

On 1/4/19 8:22 AM, Daniel Walsh wrote: > On 1/3/19 10:19 PM, H wrote: >> I recently updated docker to version 18.09 and I seem to have lost the container id in the command prompt when I exec into a running container, a very useful feature in the previous version I was running. I have not found any information in the Docker General Forum. >> >> Has anyone else seen this?

On 01/04/2019 09:16 PM, H wrote: > On 01/04/2019 08:27 AM, Daniel Walsh wrote: >> On 1/4/19 8:22 AM, Daniel Walsh wrote: >>> On 1/3/19 10:19 PM, H wrote: >>>> I recently updated docker to version 18.09 and I seem to have lost the container id in the command prompt when I exec into a running container, a very useful feature in the previous version I was running. I have

On 1/4/19 9:50 PM, H wrote: > On 01/04/2019 09:16 PM, H wrote: >> On 01/04/2019 08:27 AM, Daniel Walsh wrote: >>> On 1/4/19 8:22 AM, Daniel Walsh wrote: >>>> On 1/3/19 10:19 PM, H wrote: >>>>> I recently updated docker to version 18.09 and I seem to have lost the container id in the command prompt when I exec into a running container, a very useful

On 01/04/2019 08:27 AM, Daniel Walsh wrote: > On 1/4/19 8:22 AM, Daniel Walsh wrote: >> On 1/3/19 10:19 PM, H wrote: >>> I recently updated docker to version 18.09 and I seem to have lost the container id in the command prompt when I exec into a running container, a very useful feature in the previous version I was running. I have not found any information in the Docker General

On 1/3/19 10:19 PM, H wrote: > I recently updated docker to version 18.09 and I seem to have lost the container id in the command prompt when I exec into a running container, a very useful feature in the previous version I was running. I have not found any information in the Docker General Forum. > > Has anyone else seen this? > > _______________________________________________ >

As I am learning docker lately I came to the idea of using a docker container as a "fallback" DC at sites where there is no budget (or understanding) for a 2nd physical DC. That 2nd DC *might* run as docker container alongside the DM/fileserver, right? OK, it should get a separate IP, I assume etc Aside from the details: does anyone here actually do that?

Am 03.09.18 um 15:12 schrieb Robert Marcano via samba: > On 09/03/2018 04:10 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: >> >> As I am learning docker lately I came to the idea of using a docker >> container as a "fallback" DC at sites where there is no budget (or >> understanding) for a 2nd physical DC. >> >> That 2nd DC *might* run as docker

Hallo, I planning to migrate ouch dockerfarm from debian to centos. Most of our customers are using redhat or centos and some oft eh books I m using are written for centos too. My question: Should I use docker from the standard repo or the version from the docker-repo? Thanks for hints Ralf Ralf Prengel Teamleiter Customer Care Comline AG Hauert 8 D-44227 Dortmund/Germany ...

Le 10/08/2020 ? 17:03, Roberto Ragusa a ?crit?: > Where is your docker coming from? >From the CentOS repository on Docker.com: $ head -n 7 /etc/yum.repos.d/docker-ce.repo [docker-ce-stable] name=Docker CE Stable - $basearch baseurl=https://download.docker.com/linux/centos/7/$basearch/stable enabled=1 gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=https://download.docker.com/linux/centos/gpg Nearly all the online

> On Mar 5, 2020, at 6:05, Peter Kjellstr?m wrote: > > You can use singularity. The following example makes an image by > pulling from centos on dockerhub: Interesting! However, I would prefer to use more ?native? Docker commands, as I would rather not have all developers install and configure Singularity when they already have Docker installed on their systems. There has got to be

KubeVirt is a custom resource (a kind of plugin) for Kubernetes which adds support for running virtual machines. As part of this they have the same problems as everyone else of how to import large disk images into the system for pets, templates, etc. As part of the project they've defined a format for embedding a disk image into a container (unclear why? perhaps so these can be distributed

CentOS-6 When I login as root I see this prompt: [root at vhost04 ~]# When I login as a non-priviledged user I see this instead: sh-4.1$ .bashrc and .bash_profile have identical contents in /root and /home/user. What causes the difference? Why? How does one change the default so that all normal users get a [userid at hostname pwd]$ prompt? I have loked in/etc/profile.d and /etc/bashrc

On Monday, August 7, 2023 6:05:03 AM EDT Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > https://github.com/samba-in-kubernetes > Andrew, thanks a bunch for pointing people to our org! I really appreciate it. More below... > On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 11:08 +0200, Joachim Lindenberg via samba wrote: > > Hello Anantha, Michael, > > IIRC this is somewhat optimistic or a secret sausage. For

On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 11:16:01PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote: > On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 11:18 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > KubeVirt is a custom resource (a kind of plugin) for Kubernetes which > > adds support for running virtual machines. As part of this they have > > the same problems as everyone else of how to import large disk images

On Nov 14, 2023, at 13:44, lejeczek via CentOS <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > How do you emulate AMR arch With QEMU: $ uname -r 5.14.0-284.30.1.el9_2.x86_64 $ sudo dnf install qemu-user-static-aarch64 $ docker pull --platform=linux/arm64 tangentsoft/iperf3 $ docker export $(docker create --name iperf3 tangentsoft/iperf3) > iperf3.tar $ tar xf iperf3.tar $ file bin/iperf3

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 09:05:12AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > > $ podman build -f ci/containers/alpine-edge.Dockerfile -t libnbd-alpine-edge You usually shouldn't need this step when reproducing a problem on CI. Instead just use the container that gitlab has published under the project's registry For any job eg https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/jobs/3973002673 you'll see at

On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 at 20:52, H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: > > Understood. Since I am running CentOS 7, I guess I could create a CentOS 8 docker container and install R in that? I am not planning to upgrade the system to CentOS 8. Of course, you can do that. With podman it's even easier. But then I'd use Fedora as the base image instead, because you'll enjoy binary

Hi folks. Just wondering how I can implement an automatic .bash_profile for root. I have to load my user .bash_profile every time I get into root, and I would like a better solution. There is no /home/ for root, so I?m a bit confused if this is even allowed. Any insight appreciated. Cheers, Bee

We have a requirement to allow ssh access to a server in order to provide a secure link to one of our legacy systems. I would like to chroot these accounts. I have this working except for one small detail, the user's prompt in the ssh session. Each user has their shell set to /bin/bash in /etc/passwd. However, instead of getting the prompt defined in their .bash_profiles we see this:

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 07:04:59AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 3/20/23 20:41, Eric Blake wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 10:41:37AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > >> This is version 4 of the following sub-series: > >> > >> [libnbd PATCH v3 09/29] lib/utils: introduce async-signal-safe execvpe() > >> [libnbd PATCH v3 10/29] lib/utils: add unit tests