similar to: Gnome-shell memory

Someone else got the 7 pxe install going, and one thing that's annoying is that NetworkMangler appears to be regularly trying to fire up the wifi. On a workstation, in a wired environment. I just want to tell NM to knock it off....It's Monday, and my searching isn't going too well. Clues for the poor? mark

> Sounds like a hammer method. Is this issue already communicated to upstream (bugzilla)? I believe so - Gnome 3.28+ says even more memory fixes... I would think something like that they would rebase gnome again (hopefully before 7.7). But certainly not up to me. Jerry

Dear R users, I am working on allocating the rows within a dataframe into some factor levels.Consider the following dataframe: Start.action Start.time 1 Start.setting 2010-12-30 17:58:00 2 Start.setting 2010-12-30 18:40:00 3 Start.setting 2010-12-31 22:39:00 4 Start.setting 2010-12-31 23:24:00 5

And if you're really security conscious consider using port knocking (knock server - amazingly easy to set up. Or use fwknop, a little more difficult to set up but not much. Finally, for the hard core who really like pain - write the iptables rules yourself). ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pete Biggs" <pete at biggs.org.uk> To: "centos" <centos at

Hello, just a little question: Exists a way to update the Gnome 2.28.1 out of box at Centos 6.4 to a Gnome 3? And if yes...how does this work? thanks a lot. -- thanks + bye ajh

We are seeing a problem that occurs ~5% of the time when rebooting CentOS 7.7 where systemd gets a 'Connection timed out' to D-Bus just after the D-Bus service starts - from 'journalctl -x' : ... Jan 21 16:09:59 linux7-7.mpc.local systemd[1]: Started D-Bus System Message Bus. -- Subject: Unit dbus.service has finished start-up -- Defined-By: systemd -- Support:

Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in <20240704180538.iV4uex29 at steffen%sdaoden.eu>: |Simon Josefsson wrote in | <87jzi1fg24.fsf at kaka.sjd.se>: ||Jochen Bern <Jochen.Bern at binect.de> writes: ||> (And since you mention "port knocking", I'd like to repeat how fond I ||> am of upgrading that original concept to a single-packet ||> crypto-armored

Hi There seems to be a discrepancy in the s4 schema concerning security groups. Domain Users comes with gidNumber: 100. This is however contrary to what the schema allows. You can show this as follows: Create a new group. samba-tool group add mygroup. Use phpldapadmin to add the gidNumber attribute. There is an error because gidNumber is provided by the posixGroup class and that objectclass is

P.S.: Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in <20240707025234.j3oUaPFH at steffen%sdaoden.eu>: |Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in | <20240704180538.iV4uex29 at steffen%sdaoden.eu>: ||Simon Josefsson wrote in || <87jzi1fg24.fsf at kaka.sjd.se>: |||Jochen Bern <Jochen.Bern at binect.de> writes: |||> (And since you mention "port knocking", I'd like to repeat how fond I

Simon Josefsson wrote in <87jzi1fg24.fsf at kaka.sjd.se>: |Jochen Bern <Jochen.Bern at binect.de> writes: |> (And since you mention "port knocking", I'd like to repeat how fond I |> am of upgrading that original concept to a single-packet |> crypto-armored implementation like fwknop.) | |I am reluctantly considering to use some kind of port knocking

Is booting a new centos virtual image (centos 7.7 host) supported with EFI under 7.7 If so how. Last time on 7.6 it was a technology preview or something. Thanks Jerry

Hello Samba Friends, For those of you who have had to sift through Samba logs for clues on how to determine what caused an account to lock after repeated failed logon attempts, what "log level" settings have you found to be most helpful? Thanks, Matthew ©2017 KNOCK, inc. All rights reserved. KNOCK is a registered trademark of KNOCK, inc. This message and any attachments contain

In general we do not allow the removal of schema. In particular, because records in samba are stored under the attribute name, removing schema or renaming schema items describing those attributes and objectclasses can mean records cannot be processed correctly. However, if you confirm you really have exactly the entry already in the schema, you could edit the new schema not to add that

Hi all, Another Debian Etch fan here, running shorewall (shell) 3.2.6-2 (and Yes I''m going to upgrade when Lenny goes stable). I already have the SSHKnock working, as documented on the website: http://www.shorewall.net/PortKnocking.html Thanks, works great! In addition to the knock to open 22, I want to also ADD a redirect, from 2222 to 22 on an internal box. So, when I knock on 1600

On 4/21/2017 1:28 PM, Matthew Delfino via samba wrote: > Hey Samba Friends, > > Maybe the below question is too general. How about this: I’ve set my "log level = auth:10" in the global parameters of my smb.conf file. > > I then purposely failed to log into an account on my Windows 10 machine until the account was locked. > > I’ve run the following command where x

I am attempting to use the Knock.pm from http://www.shorewall.net/ManualChains.html I am not having much luck making the DNAT- knock work for some reason. Anyone else using this on 4.4.4 that can verify if this still works as documented? Thanks ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the

Morning... I have a package that I think wants to compile against the X11 source tree. http://openchrome.org - its a snapshot from there.... Anyway the command it tells me to run is: xmkmf /usr/src/xc make make install This is to build a updated X graphics driver... However when I do this I get errors as there is not /usr/src/xc (no surprise) I did then "up2date xorg-x11-sdk"

On Mon, 18 May 2015, James Hogarth wrote: > On 18 May 2015 at 20:10, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: >> Someone else got the 7 pxe install going, and one thing that's annoying is >> that NetworkMangler appears to be regularly trying to fire up the wifi. >> >> On a workstation, in a wired environment. I just want to tell NM to knock >> it off....It's

On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 21:49 +0300, aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi wrote: > > > > Did you check your setup against > http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/Kerberos I did. ?Of course, it's possible I've still managed to overlook something.? > Also can you provide klist -k on server? I assume you mean the kerberos server: [ root at knock ~]# klist -k Keytab

I installed my first UEFI disk yesterday. Seemed to go fine. CentOS 7.6 x86_64 I then took that disk "out" of that machine and put it another machine - it seems to not even boot. I put the original disk back in that machine and it boots fine. I put the UEFI disk back in the machine I built it on and it works fine. They are similar machines either and i3 and i7. Shouldn't that work?