similar to: CentOS 7.5 Linux box got infected with Watchbog malware

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On 12/17/18 2:57 PM, Mauricio Tavares wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 12:40 PM Kaushal Shriyan >> <kaushalshriyan at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Is there a way to find out how the CentOS 7.5 Linux box got infected >>> with malware? Currently i am referring to >>>

> Is there a way to find out how the CentOS 7.5 Linux box got infected with > malware? > Currently i am referring to > http://sudhakarbellamkonda.blogspot.com/2018/11/blocking-watchbog-malwareransomware.html > to carry out the below steps and is done manually. > > 1)rm -fr /tmp/*timesyncc.service* > 2)crontab -e -u apigee > delete the cron entry > */1 * * * * (curl

On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:11 PM Kaushal Shriyan <kaushalshriyan at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way to find out how the CentOS 7.5 Linux box got infected with > malware? > Currently i am referring to > http://sudhakarbellamkonda.blogspot.com/2018/11/blocking-watchbog-malwareransomware.html > to carry out the below steps and is done manually. > > 1)rm

On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 12:40 PM Kaushal Shriyan <kaushalshriyan at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Is there a way to find out how the CentOS 7.5 Linux box got infected with > malware? > Currently i am referring to > http://sudhakarbellamkonda.blogspot.com/2018/11/blocking-watchbog-malwareransomware.html > to carry out the below steps and is done manually. > >

SlashDot had an article today on a Linux server malware attack, <http://it.slashdot.org/story/14/03/18/2218237/malware-attack-infected-25000-linuxunix-servers>. I wonder if there is a simple test to see if a CentOS machine has been infected in this way? The article mentions Yara and Snort rules to test for this, but I wonder if there is something simpler? Alternatively, are there Yara or

On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 5:49 PM Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> wrote: > On 1/6/2019 10:51 PM, Kaushal Shriyan wrote: > > the product does not support the latest CentOS Linux > > release 7.6.1810 (Core) version as of now. > > What product and what, specifically, about 7.6 does it not support? > Could you not just exclude the incompatible packages? You could

In article <68ce2ebfe8545ef4eda869657c72b9be.squirrel at webmail.bi.invoca.ch>, Simon Matter via CentOS <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 5:49 PM Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> > > wrote: > > > >> On 1/6/2019 10:51 PM, Kaushal Shriyan wrote: > >> > the product does not support the latest CentOS Linux >

I'll throw this thought out here so it doesn't get lost: when it came time for me to build a Windows release, I always used a quarantined Windows box that had the minimum stuff installed and had never been on a network, to avoid malware getting into the binaries. The last thing I ever wanted to hear was some Windows user blaming FLAC because a bad build infected him.? It was bad enough

I had to deal with ransomware at the end of April. One of the PCs on my customer's network was infected by opening a realistic looking email apparently from a genuine supplier to the company and personally addressed. The infection occurred on Wednesday, but encryption of the server only took place late on Friday afternoon, presumably having obtained encryption keys from the criminals. The

My belief is that this is not possible, but there are many extremely knowledgeable people participating on this list and I would like to know if it is in fact possible. I am running CentOS 5.3 (32 bit) fully updated. Browser is Mozilla Firefox v.3.0.7. I believe both times this happened, once yesterday and once today, I was surfing on the web site of my favorite singer/musical group; or in the

Hi all I am relatively new to LLVM and I am still trying to work my way through. What I am trying to implement is a list of array access and indices of the same within loops. I can then probably try to work on dependencies they can have. I have already got all the Basic blocks in a loop and I am looking at load & store instructions to reconstruct array access (casting GEP instructions). I

Hi, Hopefully the video Michael posted will help you, thanks for posting. It's more useful to the user of these passes than the developer I guess (it describes the theoretical background, hurdles of the implementation etc.). But the two passes we describe, DependenceAnalysis and MemorySSA, have very clean interfaces so you shouldn't have a problem in that matter. You probably want to look

feder wrote: > as for me I use ProteMac NetMine What do you use the Mac spy software for? [Rolling Eyes]

On 06/12/2015 01:01 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 06/13/2015 11:11 AM, jd1008 wrote: >> All your browsing history, all cookies ...etc are open books >> as far as many javascripts are concerned. > > Javascript can use CSS attributes to see if you've visited a specific > URL, which is unfortunate, but that's a long way from saying that your > history is an open

Am 16.05.2016 um 01:05 schrieb jacek burghardt: > Iscsi cant be encrypted. what has this to do with samba and who has iSCSI (SAN) on the normal network instead a seperated storage network or in case of a small VMware cluster with 2 hosts even not just 2 network cables from each to the SAN-storage with no switch at all? > On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 3:30 PM, peter lawrie < >

Hi, we do have some subnetworks for private computers, which are allowed to use there public smtp servers like msn, web.de or whatever with the users private accounts. All our own computers have to send mail trough our mailserver with user authentication. From time to time we are faced with the fact, that a virus infected private notebook sends spam and we are told by our ISP to take care :)

I persuaded my friends to convert to Linux, now they want Sketchup! They are the sort of people who would click on anything and I don't want them to get malware etc. Is there a way to make Wine run *only* Sketchup and nothing else? I did try searching for the answer but couldn't find one. Thanks

Hi All, Is there anything in Samba that will help protect against ransomware? -T -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Computers are like air conditioners. They malfunction when you open windows ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I've just got a question. I've searched extensively for an answer and can't seem to find anyone else who is even curious about this, much less an answer. Simply put: We don't care about security at the office. Our current configuration is to have just one SMB user logged in on ALL machines. We've had a little bit of weirdness but can't pin it down. In other words, we have

Am 20.04.2015 um 00:24 schrieb Andrey Repin: > First, I don't see "guest ok = yes" on your share. > Second, try with "map to guest = bad user", if you don't want to fix the link > to your domain proper. And probably you must also make sure that the user specified at "map to guest" actually exists, and has read permission in the shared directory.