similar to: SFTP - Private/Public Authentication Keysets Beyond The First Set

Inclusion of the -i flag and the location of the private key solved the problem. Thanks Steve! -----Original Message----- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Steve Clark Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 2:38 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] SFTP - Private/Public Authentication Keysets Beyond The First Set On 12/12/2018 03:32 PM, Steve Clark wrote:

On 12/12/2018 03:32 PM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 12/12/2018 03:28 PM, Gary Braatz wrote: >> Thanks for responding so quickly! No but I will try. Are you saying the >> first vendor connection worked because id_rsa and id_rsa.pub are the >> defaults if not specified? (I didn't use the -i flag for the first vendor.) >> >> >> -----Original Message-----

On 12/12/2018 03:28 PM, Gary Braatz wrote: > Thanks for responding so quickly! No but I will try. Are you saying the > first vendor connection worked because id_rsa and id_rsa.pub are the > defaults if not specified? (I didn't use the -i flag for the first vendor.) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Steve

Thanks for responding so quickly! No but I will try. Are you saying the first vendor connection worked because id_rsa and id_rsa.pub are the defaults if not specified? (I didn't use the -i flag for the first vendor.) -----Original Message----- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Steve Clark Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 2:23 PM To: CentOS mailing list

On 12/12/2018 03:13 PM, Gary Braatz wrote: > I'm new to SFTP and using this mailing list was able to successfully create > my first Private/Public keyset for a vendor hosting the SFTP server (I'm the > client). I created the keyset by typing this: > > > > # ssh-keygen -t rsa > > > > When asked for the password/passphrase I hit <Enter> and

I'm new to SFTP and using this mailing list was able to successfully create my first Private/Public keyset for a vendor hosting the SFTP server (I'm the client). I created the keyset by typing this: # ssh-keygen -t rsa When asked for the password/passphrase I hit <Enter> and afterwards "id_rsa" and "id_rsa.pub" were created in "/root/.ssh/". I

On 12/12/18 4:40 PM, Gary Braatz wrote: > Inclusion of the -i flag and the location of the private key solved the > problem. > > Thanks Steve! > > You really don't need multiple ppk pairs for different hosts. One for all is what I do. As long as you keep the private key private you only need distribute the one public key every where you need secure identification. Mike

Dear R-experts, I have a table with following collumns: State, SamplePlot, Species and BodySize. I sampled bird species at 34 SamplePlots and 5 States (regions) monthly during two years. On each bird record I measured bodysize and identified the species. So I have many records of each species (about 150 species) at each SamplePlot and each Region (State). Now I would like bootstrap

Dear R-friends, Unfortunately the tables that I "past" on last email gone with bad visual structure. So I send it again. Sorry to do this so confuse. Miltinho ==== Table1 - Bird records State,SampleSite,Species,Bodysize SaoPaulo,Site1,Spp01,4.39 SaoPaulo,Site1,Spp04,4.05 SaoPaulo,Site1,Spp01,2.75 SaoPaulo,Site1,Spp02,8.18 SaoPaulo,Site1,Spp02,0.80

g''day all, I need help with this please. I have a dataset of site names and years they were trapped in (a subset of it is bs, below) and a dataset of sites that actually caught animals (subsetted as brep, below). I need to add to brep, a row with a zero in the classcount column, for every year each site was trapped but caught nothing. so for Site 1, I need to add rows that say

Hello, I'm running a few tests here with two locations. site1: server-site1.gsg.local subnet 192.168.200.0/24 site2: server-site2.gsg.local subnet 192.168.190.0/24 both are connected via VPN. I migrated an samba3 domain at server-site1 it gets Default-First-Site-Name assigned. Then I joined the new samba4 domain withe server-site2. Both servers work and i can join and access them with

I am trying to use the function gl (generate levels), and would like to make levels with different number of replications. Does anyone know how to generate different number of replications in each level? Something like: [1] Site1 Site1 Site1 Site1 Site1 Site1 Site1 [8] Site2 Site2 Site2 Site2 Site2 Thanks in advance -- Rog?rio R. Silva MZUSP http://www.mz.usp.br Linux/Debian User # 354364

hii guys i have some issue with dns in samba 4 i have install and setup 2 samba dc in different Site site2 dc joint to site1 dc, with internal dns topology : site1 --- openvpn server --- firewall --- wan --- openvpn client --- site2 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.0/24 in site1 i have some application let say email server: mail.local.lan > 192.168.1.2 web server : web.local.lan > 192.168.1.3

I'm designing a system where some but not all groups of users want to share a single mailbox, i.e the user will not have there own inbox. I think this is possible by setting up a user database that returns the same mail location and possible the same home directory. This sharing would only occur in a single domain. Example User Database UserID | home | mail all at site1.example.com |

I am attempting to join several dataframes that summarize sampling effort for different samples into one large data.frame/table. I have looked at the merge command, but have not been clever enough to figure out how to get it to do what I want. A simplified example of what I am trying to do: The dataframes I have look like this (they were generated using the table command) species1.effort

Hello, I'd like to transpose data to create an analysis-friendly dataframe. See below for an example, I was unable to use t(x) and I couldn't find a function with options like PROC TRANSPOSE in SAS. The ideal solution handles variable quantities of SITE - but beggars can't be choosers. :-) Thank you in advance, Mike ## INPUT DATA USER_ID<-c(1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,4) SITE

The combination of survfit, coxph, and factors is getting confused. It is not smart enough to match a new data frame that contains a numeric for sitenew to a fit that contained that variable as a factor. (Perhaps it should be smart enough to at least die gracefully -- but it's not). The simple solution is to not use factors. site1 <- 1*(coxsnps$sitenew==1) site2 <-

Hello R list, I have a list of data frames, in the form (dump output for an example list follows message): $site1 year data 1 2000 0.03685042 2 2001 0.02583885 6 2005 0.02480015 7 2006 0.03458745 $site2 year data 1 2002 4.071134e-03 2 2003 -4.513524e-08 3 2004 8.336272e-08 4 2005 2.270803e-08 5 2006 1.263597e-02 6 2007 NaN I would like to plot each

Hello, I'm using the rmeta package to perform a meta analysis using summary statistics rather than raw data, and would like to analyze the effects in three different subgroups of my data. Furthermore, I'd like to plot this on one forest plot, with corresponding summary weighted averages of the effects displayed beneath each subgroup. I am able to generate the subgroup analyses by simply

The simplest would be to convert precip to character and then back to a factor if you really want it to be a factor. This will also remove the levels that no longer exist. str(dat) # 'data.frame': 5 obs. of 3 variables: # $ Sites : Factor w/ 5 levels "Site1","Site2",..: 1 2 3 4 5 # $ temp : num 14 15 12 12.5 17 # $ precip: Factor w/ 5 levels