similar to: // RESEND // 7.6: Software RAID1 fails the only meaningful test

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "// RESEND // 7.6: Software RAID1 fails the only meaningful test"

2018 Dec 06
0
// RESEND // 7.6: Software RAID1 fails the only meaningful test
On 12/5/18 11:55 AM, Benjamin Smith wrote: > The point of RAID1 is to allow for continued uptime in a failure scenario. > When I assemble servers with RAID1, I set up two HDDs to mirror each other, > and test by booting from each drive individually to verify that it works. For > the OS partitions, I use simple partitions and ext4 so it's as simple as > possible. I used my test
2016 Nov 02
3
tool for a comprehensive list of the storage structure
I would like to have a smart cli tool, that shows a comprehensive list about the local storage structure: An output like: /srv /dev/mapper/luks-f85b7a2c-...: UUID="ca924fad-..." TYPE="ext4" /dev/mapper/vg_internal_e-lv_internal_srv: UUID="f85b7a2c-..." TYPE="crypto_LUKS" vg_internal_e /dev/md3: UUID="1Fi2Ex-..."
2013 Jan 03
33
Option LABEL
Hallo, linux-btrfs, please delete the option "-L" (for labelling) in "mkfs.btrfs", in some configurations it doesn''t work as expected. My usual way: mkfs.btrfs -d raid0 -m raid1 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd ... One call for some devices. Wenn I add the option "-L mylabel" then each device gets the same label, and therefore some other programs
2016 Nov 02
0
tool for a comprehensive list of the storage structure
Try *lsblk -f* *[root at david ~]# lsblk -f NAME FSTYPE LABEL UUID MOUNTPOINT sda ??sda1 LVM2_member DWnNT0-aHQK-4zxn-cWIL-4iAQ-fboe-QaeyOK ??vg_Backups-Backups ext4 Backups 97baf04c-5dbb-43bd-9e56-b1c23e623ae4 /media/Backups sdb ??sdb1 ext4 boot 7186c3bc-ef06-4d34-9caf-3813ec004fbb
2009 Nov 18
1
To loop or not to loop with btrfs
Hi, This left me puzzled for a while: 22:29 borg:/ # losetup /dev/loop1 /.B.disk 22:29 borg:/ # mount /dev/loop1 /B mount: /dev/loop1: can''t read superblock 22:29 borg:/ # blkid /dev/loop1 /dev/loop1: UUID="e19fe89b-cde3-4ccc-bc70-b759a57bd1c9" UUID_SUB="f29c6218-d040-4546-a227-4dd2d2142817" TYPE="btrfs" 22:29 borg:/ # losetup -d /dev/loop1 22:29 borg:/ #
2011 Jun 25
8
how do determine last file system on disk?
Hi all, Does anyone know how to determine which file system a disk was formatted with, if fdisk -l doesn't show it? usb-storage: device found at 5 usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning Vendor: Model: Rev: Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 sd 7:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sda sd 7:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic
2018 Dec 04
5
Accidentally nuked my system - any suggestions ?
Hi, My workstation is running CentOS 7 on two disks (sda and sdb) in a software RAID 1 setup. It looks like I accidentally nuked it. I wanted to write an installation ISO file to a USB disk, and instead of typing dd if=install.iso of=/dev/sdc I typed /dev/sdb. As soon as I hit <Enter>, the screen froze. I tried a hard reset, but of course, the boot process would stop short very early in
2011 Dec 03
1
[PATCH] NEW API: add blkid command to print the attributes of the device
A NEW API blkid. It can print the device attributes. Use it after list-devices, we can list ower devices and the attributes of each device. Use it like: blkid <device> It's should be a usefull function, and needed no test case for it. Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong at cn.fujitsu.com> --- daemon/blkid.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2010 Oct 24
4
Determine if a given fs is a btrfs fs
Hi, I''ve some btrfs fs which are encrypted with loopaes. I decrypt them in a script during bootup. Now I want to determine if the decrypted fs is a btrfs fs. If not I missspelled the password and I can handle that error in my script. Thanks for any help! Felix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to
2001 May 15
1
Is comment order meaningful?
The spec seems to be unclear on this: should two comment haeders who only differ in the order of comments be considered equevalent? VCE shows comments in the order read and allows to store them in any order (it has move up/down buttons). Comment editors with a fixed layout (like the commmon TITLE/ARTIST/etc. fields in PP's winamp plugin) don't show the order and give no control of it.
2000 Nov 11
1
Meaningful encoder testing
Ross Levis <ross@soulfm.cjb.net> wrote: > and submitted which show up problems in the LAME encoder. I thought > Velvet.wav was on the list but I just checked and couldn't find it so I > presume LAME has fixed the problem. I guess Monty has gone through the You can get velvet.wav from here: http://r3mix.50g.com/velvet.zip (2MB) Greetings, Aleksandar --- >8 ---- List
2003 Dec 22
1
[R] lattice: levelplot: error: min not meaningful for factor (PR#6005)
R 1.8.1: ___COMMAND____________________________________________ levelplot( yield ~ year * variety | site, barley ) ___ERROR_MESSAGE______________________________________ Error in Summary.factor(..., na.rm = na.rm) : "min" not meaningful for factors ___COMMENT____________________________________________ levelplot( yield ~ as.numeric(year) * as.numeric(variety) | site,
2003 Dec 22
0
(PR#6005) Re: [R] lattice: levelplot: error: min not meaningful
Actually, this is supposed to work (and is given as an example in my DSC-2003 paper), and at some point, did. It seems this was broken as a consequence of a careless change in panel.levelplot. The first 5 lines should have been label.style <- match.arg(label.style) x <- as.numeric(x[subscripts]) y <- as.numeric(y[subscripts]) minXwid <- min(diff(sort(unique(x))))
2015 Sep 29
0
making object.size() more meaningful on environments?
Herve, The problem then would be that for A a refClass whose fields take up N bytes (in the sense that you mean), if we do B <- A A and B would look like the BOTH take up N bytes, for a total of 2N, whereas AFAIK R would only be using ~ N + 2*56 bytes, right? ~G On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Currently object.size()
2010 Sep 05
1
Warning messages: not meaningful for factors
Dear Experts, I need to include the repeated structure in our data set object, recall.sums.df, before using gls function. Thus I used groupedData. But I encountered error messages which may mean '*' is not not meaningful factor. Please let me know what I have to do. Thanks, Jeong > recall.sums.df[0:10, ] recall.values recall.ind subj replication hemi region group 1 17.515
2003 Jan 02
1
aggregate: "sum" not meaningful for factors
Dear all, I try to summarise my data per category using aggregate, but for some reason I get the error message "sum" not meaningful for factors even though my vector is numeric. The data set is shown below. Could someone please give a hint. Thanks in advance! Sincerely, Tord > names(test) [1] "ObjektID" "tallstubbyta" > is.factor(test$ObjektID);
2012 Oct 04
1
Ops.factor(point1, point2) : - not meaningful for factors
Hi, can anyone help me in this problem :(. I am a total beginner in R software. It took me 2 days just to look into this problem. Due to this problem. I cant do looping. i want to find the distance between x and DSi > DSi i Si 1 1 (5, 20) 2 2 (20, 2) 3 3 (25, 32) 4 4 (8, 39) 5 5 (10, 17) 6 6 (35, 20) 7 7 (38, 10) > str (DSi) 'data.frame': 7 obs. of 2 variables: $ i
2006 Jul 13
6
creating meaningful urls, (changing default)
Hi, Urls in ruby are as defualt set to :controller/:action/:id How can I change it to somthing like this :controller/:action/:id/#random title# #random title# may be a variable or taken from a field in the database thanks scott -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2008 Jun 04
1
"& not meaningful for factors"
I am trying to define groupings from levels of factor variables and this the warning message that R give "& not meaningful for factors". The nature of my task is this. I have a variable stage which has the levels (1B, 2A, 2B) - these are the AJCC TNM stages of cancer, and another variable diameter with factor levels ("=< 4", "4 - 6.5, > 6.5; limit values are
2010 Dec 14
1
rpart - how to estimate the “meaningful” predictors for an outcome (in classification trees)
Hi dear R-help memebers, When building a CART model (specifically classification tree) using rpart, it is sometimes obvious that there are variables (X's) that are meaningful for predicting some of the outcome (y) variables - while other predictors are relevant for other outcome variables (y's only). *How can it be estimated, which explanatory variable is "used" for which of