similar to: RHEL 8 Public Beta Released

> Am 19.11.2018 um 15:35 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: > > >> Am 15.11.2018 um 15:37 schrieb Yan Li <elliot.li.tech at gmail.com>: >> >> https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/powering-its-future-while-preserving-present-introducing-red-hat-enterprise-linux-8-beta >> > > Just wondering, are Software Collections on the trail of

On 11/15/18 11:50 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >> https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/powering-its-future-while-preserving-present-introducing-red-hat-enterprise-linux-8-beta > > Just wondering, is there still something like a mailing list where betas > are discussed? IIRC EL6 beta was the last one I saw but maybe I'm missing > something? That question is pertinent to RedHat

On 11/15/18 12:01 PM, Simon Matter wrote: >> >> >> On 11/15/18 11:50 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >>>> https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/powering-its-future-while-preserving-present-introducing-red-hat-enterprise-linux-8-beta >>> >>> Just wondering, is there still something like a mailing list where betas >>> are discussed? IIRC EL6 beta was the

> Am 15.11.2018 um 21:35 schrieb Simon Matter <simon.matter at invoca.ch>: > >> >> >> On 11/15/18 12:01 PM, Simon Matter wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 11/15/18 11:50 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/powering-its-future-while-preserving-present-introducing-red-hat-enterprise-linux-8-beta

On 10/30/18 2:35 PM, vychytraly wrote: > Are you sure about this? They only mention "The FreeType font engine has > been rebased to version 2.8, which is required by GNOME 3.28" but was GNOME > itself also updated? Yes: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3140 > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:15 PM Yan Li <elliot.li.tech at gmail.com> wrote: > >>

> Am 15.11.2018 um 15:37 schrieb Yan Li <elliot.li.tech at gmail.com>: > > https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/powering-its-future-while-preserving-present-introducing-red-hat-enterprise-linux-8-beta > Just wondering, are Software Collections on the trail of EOL now? Application Streams the new way to do? -- LF PS: I'm sure CentOS8 will be at the end of June 2019 available

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html-single/7.6_release_notes/ They silently rebased GNOME to 3.28, which wasn't in the 7.6 beta nor in the release notes. Can't wait to see it on my desktop. Too bad we still have to wait for 3.29, which has more fixes for the huge memory leak of gnome-shell. -- Yan Li

On 11/27/18 11:43 AM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: >> Just wondering, are Software Collections on the trail of EOL now? >> >> Application Streams the new way to do? > > This answers my own question :-) > > https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2018/11/15/rhel8-introducing-appstreams/ Also this one:

On 04/25/19 04:36, Gary Stainburn wrote: > On Wednesday 24 April 2019 17:22:13 John R. Dennison wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:18:40AM -0400, mark wrote: >>> Nope. Well... actually, my manager's talking about Ubuntu or maybe even >>> FreeBSD. He's *extremely* upset with RH being so slow - 8 should have >>> been out for some time, for one, and a lot

On 08/18/2017 03:33 AM, ken wrote: > On 08/17/2017 11:19 PM, Yan Li wrote: >> On 08/17/2017 05:05 PM, Fred Smith wrote: >>> Hmm. was unaware of tracker-etc. what are these indexes used for? >>> I can't think of anything I do on the system that would need to know >>> all bout some arbitrary file somewhere on the filesysystem, so why >>> would this be

On Feb 15, 2019, at 7:56 AM, Yan Li <elliot.li.tech at gmail.com> wrote: > > G Suite Business tier. Buy five users and you get unlimited Google Drive > storage. That's $50/month. So, you?re already 12x higher than his budget, and it?ll be going up 20% in early April. On top of that, there?s certainly a transfer rate limit. I couldn?t find a reliable source saying what that

> >> Am 15.11.2018 um 21:35 schrieb Simon Matter <simon.matter at invoca.ch>: >> >>> >>> >>> On 11/15/18 12:01 PM, Simon Matter wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 11/15/18 11:50 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >>>>>>>

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Yan Li <elliot.li.tech at gmail.com> wrote: > On 09/22/2017 07:33 AM, Larry Martell wrote: >> I am trying to get a centos 6 system on the internet with a tethered >> iPhone. I can see the phone with lsusb as bus 001 device 011. A post on >> stackoverflow said I would need to run "# ip link set usb0 up && dhcpcd >>

> > > On 11/15/18 11:50 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >>> https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/powering-its-future-while-preserving-present-introducing-red-hat-enterprise-linux-8-beta >> >> Just wondering, is there still something like a mailing list where betas >> are discussed? IIRC EL6 beta was the last one I saw but maybe I'm >> missing >> something?

I am trying to get a centos 6 system on the internet with a tethered iPhone. I can see the phone with lsusb as bus 001 device 011. A post on stackoverflow said I would need to run "# ip link set usb0 up && dhcpcd usb0" But how do I reference my phone in that command?

> > > On 11/15/18 12:01 PM, Simon Matter wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 11/15/18 11:50 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/powering-its-future-while-preserving-present-introducing-red-hat-enterprise-linux-8-beta >>>> >>>> Just wondering, is there still something like a mailing list where >>>>

On 07/05/2019 16:23, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Il 07/05/19 16:07, Rich Bowen ha scritto: >> This morning Red Hat announced the general availability of Red Hat >> Enterprise Linux 8. >> >> More details at >> https://www.redhat.com/en/about/press-releases/red-hat-enterprise-linux-8-every-enterprise-every-cloud-every-workload?sc_cid=701f2000001OIIOAA4 >>

> https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/powering-its-future-while-preserving-present-introducing-red-hat-enterprise-linux-8-beta Just wondering, is there still something like a mailing list where betas are discussed? IIRC EL6 beta was the last one I saw but maybe I'm missing something? Regards, Simon

We use GCC 6 from SoftwareCollection 6 and build our own Boost libraries with static linking. The result binaries work on all C7 instances just fine without the need to install any extra packages. The binary size isn't bloated too much by statically linking Boost, because many Boost functions are header templates anyway (but your mileage may vary). Not sure if you have other dependencies but

On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 12:01 PM ?ukasz Posadowski <mail at lukaszposadowski.pl> wrote: > I'm trying it right now. I pleasantly discover PHP 7.2 with fpm and > Python 3.6, which is exactly what I installed from 3rd party > repositories in Centos 7 on my vps. I will test upgrade from C7 to > disable epel and webtatic. Did you try SCL instead of directly installing packages