similar to: CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 164, Issue 4

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:2921 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2921 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: fb34bf864b1910f95ee731a2d5282e92b8bc53961e0386ccef153e200ef38f94 tomcat-7.0.76-8.el7_5.noarch.rpm

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:3081 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3081 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 1d033d848fb070ce731bfc768129169c2cd611bc11dc8653f5c58cb1bdfd05b9 tomcat-7.0.76-3.el7_4.noarch.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2018:2755 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:2755 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 4d3807c58d58d30562f42b516384012be18b7b3fda8b25e3c0b912966d61e326 tomcat-7.0.76-7.el7_5.noarch.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:0485 Moderate Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0485 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: b19b0d7d994f067316c56db8e4cc8f70d7943c11288383aa2127d485d0a3341e tomcat-7.0.76-9.el7_6.noarch.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:0855 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0855 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 7431986b2379c73930cda39592753d0f1f886297b8da7fdb57ef323fa3592fbf tomcat-7.0.76-11.el7_7.noarch.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:2530 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:2530 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 1a682ecdfdca8179b910e4ad1364c7ea7af6484572fa4c0bf786d78a32b2352f tomcat-7.0.76-12.el7_8.noarch.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:5020 Low Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:5020 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 3d1a72d4d1f896acb82915d2121ccc8032a2e15e43ba9390abbf0c6e1ddfdb81 tomcat-7.0.76-16.el7_9.noarch.rpm

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Hi all, First of all I am posting this on two lists for a reason, because the issue being reported by me could be because of a change delivered by a Kernel update or due to Xen. I have recently managed to update all Xen Guest domains running CentOS 5.3 to the latest bunch of updates + Kernel. My Xen host also runs the same CentOS 5.3 updated to all recent packages. The Guest images in concern

Hi all, First of all I am posting this on two lists for a reason, because the issue being reported by me could be because of a change delivered by a Kernel update or due to Xen. I have recently managed to update all Xen Guest domains running CentOS 5.3 to the latest bunch of updates + Kernel. My Xen host also runs the same CentOS 5.3 updated to all recent packages. The Guest images in concern

Hello, since kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 no user could login any more from nfs client into his home directory on nfs server. The kde error message is: "The following installation problem was detected while trying to start KDE: Writing to $HOME directory (/home/<USER>) failed with the error 'Permission denied' KDE is unable to start." /home is exported with nfs4 (gss/krb5), the

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: > On 01/11/2010 03:17 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: >> Nope, there's a newer kernel installed already. I need this particular >> older one for one of the XEN domU's on this server, and don't want to >> downgrade the running kernel and reboot the server > > man yum, > > look

Hi, On 03/02/2018 20:49, Praveen Velliengiri via llvm-dev wrote: > Hey Guys ! > I'm interested to participate in Google Summer of Code 2018 for LLVM. > Any Projects (new features or reimplementation) related to recent " > Meltdown & Spectre " Problem. > I'm a beginner in Compiler Technology. Could you please recommend some > videos or blog post about

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164 Summary: X-forwarding when connecting to an IPv6-enabled host doesn't work. Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164 ------- Additional Comments From cjwatson at debian.org 2002-10-27 00:16 ------- Marco d'Itri suggested in http://bugs.debian.org/153154 that ssh should only bind to AF_INET addresses in x11_create_display_inet(), since at least the xtrans code in XFree86 doesn't support IPv6. Is this a valid approach? ------- You are receiving this

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164 ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2004-04-26 15:14 ------- Can this bug be closed? Yoshifuji-san's patch was committed two years ago... ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

All, I've asked this once a long time ago and got a vague response, any suggestions? I'm wanting to convert for example a 7 digit extension (whether it be via dialplan or agi) to e.164. This is for the sake of getting everything outbound into e164 format. The issue I see you will need to append the areacode of the calling party to the 7 digits, from there adding a +1 is of course easy.

Alexander, Thanks a million, you really saved me some time on this one. -----Original Message----- From: Alexander Lopez [mailto:Alex.Lopez@OpSys.com] Sent: Mon 4/10/2006 1:11 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Cc: Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] ANI and DNIS Seperation on a PRI(TelephonyNumbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1)'*4105556654*8005550215*' ]) from the