similar to: C6 Bind

Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:35 AM, Ken Smith <kens at kensnet.org> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Anyone else seeing this. >> >> Just updated to kernel 2.6.32-504.12.2.el6.x86_64 and pptp vpn (invoked via >> Gnome Network Manager) fails to connect. >> >> Boot up the previous 2.6.32-504.8.1.el6.x86_64 and pptp all good. >>

Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 17.05.2017 um 12:22 schrieb Ken Smith<kens at kensnet.org>: > >> {snip} >> > > Not sure if i understand your problem. Try to regenerate the map files with > > # depmod -a > > -- > LF > > > Hi Leon, I tried that and get the same error. Its to do with the modules being signed. But I don't see how I have

Hi All, Anyone else seeing this. Just updated to kernel 2.6.32-504.12.2.el6.x86_64 and pptp vpn (invoked via Gnome Network Manager) fails to connect. Boot up the previous 2.6.32-504.8.1.el6.x86_64 and pptp all good. OpenVPN is not affected. Anyone else seeing this. I have log file details if anyone wants those. Don't see it reported elsewhere. Thanks Ken -- This message has been

Hello, As part of testing an alternative module I saved the original module and copied the test one in. The test was done and I put the original module back. Now the original module is not loading at startup and doing it manually I get the error WARNING: Error inserting {Module name & path } Required key not available. And in /var/log/messages shortly after boot I can see kernel:

I''am using the following script to aggregate the bandwidth of one quad gigabit ethernet controller (pci-express). #!/bin/bash sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_reordering = 30 ifconfig eth1 up ifconfig eth2 up ifconfig eth3 up ifconfig eth4 up modprobe sch_teql tc qdisc add dev eth1 root teql0 tc qdisc add dev eth2 root teql0 tc qdisc del dev eth3 root teql0 tc qdisc del dev eth4 root teql0 ip link

Hello, LARTC mailing readers, I hope u can help with this mysterious issue i''m having with my linux box acting as a router. Scenario: Linux running 2.6.8.1 /w julians patches Latest iproute (iproute2-ss040702) 4 NICS ----------------- | x eth0 (63.43.x.x) network mask (255.255.240.0) | | x eth1 (63.43.x.x)

Hello, LARTC mailing readers, I hope u can help with this mysterious issue i''m having with my linux box acting as a router. Scenario: Linux running 2.6.8.1 /w julians patches /w support for multipath routing Latest iproute (iproute2-ss040702) 4 NICS ----------------- | x eth0 (63.43.x.x) network mask (255.255.240.0) | |

Hi all. I have a problem with pciback in OpenSUSE using PVM. I try to send 3 nic for the PVM.. its ok.. but.. if i try ifconfig eth3 up.. got the error... Please.. see this. Anybody.. know this problem? Thanks, Junior opensuse:~ # uptime 3:36pm up 0:03, 2 users, load average: 0.02, 0.06, 0.02 opensuse:~ # uname -a Linux opensuse 2.6.27.7-9-xen #1 SMP 2008-12-04 18:10:04 +0100 x86_64

Hi, Sometimes, I found one of my Mellanox NIC renamed to rename6, instead of eth1. The right names of NICs in my system should be: eth0 Mellanox NIC eth1 Mellanox NIC eth2 Intel NIC eth3 Intel NIC eth4 Intel NIC eth5 Intel NIC eth0 and eth1 will combined as bond1 with mode 4. However, the current names are: eth0 Mellanox

Hi, This is the first time I write to the list. My english is not so good, but I hope I''ll be understood. I have 4 adsl routers, plugged on a linux box, and this box e used to connect to a local network. The linux box has 5 NICs. eth0: local network inet 10.0.0.56/24 brd 10.0.0.255 scope global eth0 eth1: adsl router 1 inet 192.168.254.1/24 brd 192.168.254.255 scope global

Hi, I have a little problem to setup iproute in my network It looks like this: ---- ----- ------ R1 R2 R3 ---- ----- ------ | | | | | | ------------------------------- ETH1 ETH2 ETH3 ETH0 ETH4 -------------> DMZ ------------------------------ | |

Am 15.10.2018 um 00:33 schrieb Ken Smith: > If I telnet to port 53 from outside my LAN I get a connection. If I stop > bind that connection is refused, confirming the local bind instance is > getting the connection. You cannot test bind operating on port 53 by UDP through telnet. Alexander

Hello all, I am new to Linux Ethernet bridging. Let me first start with what I am trying to achieve. Well you see - I am attempting to have 2 main firewall running at the same time - one as a master and the other one as a slave. Yes, I would like to make use of Ethernet bridging in this scenario - as I understand it, all I need are two machines and STP enabled. I am running Debian

Hi, I have been a shorewall user for a long time now, and it has been working flawlessly. I have now changed ISP and my new DSL connection is PPPoE. My setup is as follows: internet <--------> 3com812 Officeconnect (bridge mode) <----> eth0 <-------> linux box <----> eth1, eth2, eth3, eth4 <---> other internal networks Things are working fine, but the link is

Hello, I''m new to Xen (and this mailing-list) and facing some problems with the network. I''m stuck and don''t know how to continue. And Google isn''t very helpful either... My setup: - Ubuntu 7.10 for dom0 and Debian 4.0 for all domU - 4 physical NIC (DHCP from my ISP, internal LAN, DMZ & WLAN) - 1 Dom as firewall/router - 1 domU with internal services

Hi There, I have a bit of an odd issue. I am testing Xen 3.0.2 on a machine before fully migrating to it from 2.0.7. The host OS is Ubuntu 6.06, and I am running the pre-compiled Xen code (kernel, tools) from the Xen site. I have two NICs, both if which I amhidung from Dom0 via the ''pciback.hide'' grub entry. I am have the bridges setup in the

I am trying to configure a firewall, but nailing down the configuration is eluding me. The box is running Debian stable. Basically, I have a rackmount server with six network cards. eth0 is the internal network, eth1 is a kiosk network, eth2 is a DMZ/wireless network. On the outbound side, eth3 is a DSL connection and eth4 is a cablemodem connection. What I am trying to do is route all internal

Shorewall 4.5.1.1 I have 5 interfaces on a centos box, the first two are internal on two different subnets, the next two are two different ISP''s and the last one is a private network for testing and administration. The second internal subnet (eth1) is rejecting all the arp requests to it and I get the following in the log files ever second or two - May 16 05:28:54 services kernel:

Hi, I'm building a firewall/router on Centos. I'm using Shorewall but have currently stopped and cleared the firewall rules to isolate the routing problem. My firewall box has 5 interfaces in it but currently only two are involved in the problem. eth1: inet addr:192.168.1.224 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 eth3: inet addr:192.168.202.1 Bcast:192.168.202.255

Hello newsgroup, I hope somebody with more routing experience then me can help me with the problem I have. The setup is as described below. A dual internet provider routing, multiple local area networks, and a dmz network with one public and one private ip range. I followed the instructions at lartc.org, and so far everything is working. The default route is via