similar to: "WARNING: fdisk GPT support is currently new"

Le 07/10/2018 ? 12:09, Nicolas Kovacs a ?crit?: > Now my first reaction would be to install gdisk (yum install gdisk) and > use this to handle GTP partitioning. But I'm curious. How "experimental" > (e. g. prone to blow up in my face) is fdisk really? So far, I've only > used it for MBR-style partitioning. I have a follow-up remark. Before CentOS, I've been

On 02/08/14 17:40, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > -eltorito-id "MAC" \ thanks a lot, that seems to allow isohybrid --mac to work \o/ for the curious this is the image before and after isohybrid as shown by gparted * output from xorriso xorriso 1.3.2 : RockRidge filesystem manipulator, libburnia project. Drive current: -outdev 'stdio:../image.iso' Media current: stdio file,

Hi, I have a 24TB RAID6 disk with a GPT partition table on it. I need to partition it into 2 partitions one of 16TB and 1 of 8TB to put ext4 filesystems on both. But I really need to do this remotely. ( if I can get to the site I could use gparted ) Now fdisk doesn't understand GPT partition tables and pat

Hi all, I was using grub2 for booting Archlinux x86_64 in my GPT Internal HDD (/dev/sda) then I switched to syslinux/extlinux. It was working fine but suddenly it staring showing "Boot Error" message on screen. I googled for a solution and tried all syslinux versions from 4.04-pre4 down to 4.03-stable but non of them worked. I don't know what suddenly changed caused this

On Jun 30, 2020, at 1:25 PM, John Pierce <jhn.pierce at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 12:12 PM Jerry Geis <jerry.geis at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am trying to use CentOS 8 host to boot an image (OS X) that I created >> using dd. >> >> First I tried fdisk -l image_file.img ... > > > fdisk has been deprecated for quite a

> On 30.06.2016 19:41, Erwan Velu via Syslinux wrote: > > The exisiting label= option offer to boot on a gpt partition that have > > a particular label. > > The existing guuid= option offer to boot on a disk or partition with a > > particular label. > > > > This new option offer to boot the disk that have a partition which > > have a given label. >

Ok, did some experiments. Here's the scoop. You will need a live USB key of CentOS 6 with a persistence layer (overlay) and the EPEL gdisk package installed to make this thing boot. On a system with Chameleon already installed, boot the CentOS 6 install media. Installing Chameleon without OSX is an adventure that I've not done, so a 'testing' OSX install (10.6) with the

Hi, I encounter a problem with Syslinux 5.00 I cannot really describe. So I created two small videos: Booting with Syslinux 5.00 (1.3 MB): <https://www.dropbox.com/s/b6g8cdf2t9v48c6/boot-syslinux5-fail.mp4> How I fixed the problem by downgrading to Syslinux 4.06 and how booting should look like (6.5 MB): <https://www.dropbox.com/s/lt7cpgfm0qvqtba/boot-syslinux5-how-i-fixed-it.mp4>

Hello everyone, I am maintaining a distribution loosely based on LFS and am now trying to add UEFI support. Integrating a FAT formatted partition image containing, preloader, gummiboot, kernel and initramfs correctly results in a ISO image that is bootable on BIOS and UEFI systems if booted from the optical drive. However, when I run isohybrid --uefi name-of.iso the resulting GPT entry for

I posted this on the bugzilla page but I figured that on the mailing list it would get more attention. Please see http://bugzilla.syslinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49 for a description of my current issue. -- Thank you, Fernando Reyes GPG BDD75DD7 Mission Accomplish, Inc. http://missionaccomplish.com Email:design at missionaccomplish.com Tel: 7187100008 Cell: 3479275477

Hi, if I inspect an hybrid ISO with tools like fdisk and gdisk, then looks like hybrid ISO has both the MBR and GPT in order to support both the BIOS and UEFI: # gdisk -l /dev/sdb GPT fdisk (gdisk) version 0.8.10 Partition table scan: MBR: MBR only BSD: not present APM: not present GPT: present Found valid MBR and GPT. Which do you want to use? 1 - MBR 2 - GPT 3 - Create blank GPT

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Ady Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > >> > We would need at least: > > A_ the partitions and directory structure in which the following items > are _located_ : /dev/sda1: # tree . . ??? extlinux ? ??? ldlinux.c32 ? ??? ldlinux.sys ? ??? libcom32.c32 ? ??? libmenu.c32 ? ??? libutil.c32 ? ??? menu.c32 ? ???

I am trying to use CentOS 8 host to boot an image (OS X) that I created using dd. First I tried fdisk -l image_file.img - all looks good so I did fdisk image_file.img - this works - but seems in CentOS 8 fdisk there is no longer a toggle bootable flag option. How do I do that ? Thanks, Jerry

Can anyone explain this output what is ID ee and EFI GPT and how is ext2 or ext3 functioning under such a partitioning scheme and more how do i create new partitions on this hard-disk , this is RHEL3 on Itanium . ============================================================================== > [root at advaitha /]# fdisk -l > > Disk /dev/sda: 146.8 GB, 146815737856 bytes > 255

The idea is to boot a disk in an mbr fashion while using the GPT (not filesystem) label to detect the disk. That is useful when you use grub2 & gpt. I was in case where my nodes (100s) have 8 disks each and no guarantee of which disk is "bootable" in the disk. This way I can tell "please boot the disk that have one partition labelled "xyz"". So nothing related

part-expand-gpt takes extreme cautions and doesn't proceed to writing to the disk if the preliminary dry run of sgdisk has generated any warnings on stdout. This blocks the use of part-expand-gpt on disk shrink (with disk resize being the main usecase for part-expand-gpt), because sgdisk dry run produces a warning in that case. So remove the excessive safety check, and leave it up to the

Hello listmates, Here's I am, trying to install Centos 6.2 64-bit on a server with 24 TB of disk RAIDed as RAID 6. So I get this 18 TB disk (the RAID is recognized as one disk) where I am trying to put my OS. And I can create a couple of partitions - let us say I defiine a 150 GB swap, a 150 GB "/", a 100 GB "/var". So far so good. Then I try to define the next one, say, a

What about exfat ? 2019?11?30?(?) 18:10 Fred Smith <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us>: > On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 05:19:44PM +0100, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > > Hi, > > > > One of my clients has a mixed Linux/Mac OS/Windows environment in his > office. > > He just purchased a 4 TB external hard disk, which he intends to use on > his > > various

Hi list, I'm new with UEFI and GPT. For several years I've used MBR partition table. I've installed my system on software raid1 (mdadm) using md0(sda1,sdb1) for swap, md1(sda2, sdb2) for /, md2 (sda3,sdb3) for /home. From several how-to concerning raid1 installation, I must put each partition on a different md devices. I've asked times ago if it's more correct create the

I have a 1.5TB internal disk on my server. I partitioned this with fdisk, and CentOS-5.6 runs perfectly on it. But fdisk gives a very strange report. Here is the perfectly normal response to mount: ----------------------------- /dev/sdb10 on / type ext3 (rw) proc on /proc type proc (rw) sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620) /dev/sdb2 on /boot type ext3